
2025 USC
9–4 (7–2 Big Ten), coached by Lincoln Riley, finished No. 20 in the AP poll. Share
Schedule and results
- Best winBeat No. 15 Michigan 31–13Oct 11
Over the best-ranked team it beat, at home.
- Most excitingLost to TCU 27–30Dec 30
The win probability swung the most, by CollegeFootballData.com’s excitement index.
| Date | Opponent | Result | Elo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30 | vs | W 73–13 | 81% |
| Sep 6 | vs | W 59–20 | 71% |
| Sep 13 | at | W 33–17 | 66% |
| Sep 20 | vs | W 45–31 | 74% |
| Sep 27 | at | L 32–34 | 47% |
| Oct 11 | vs | W 31–13 | 53% |
| Oct 18 | at | L 24–34 | 29% |
| Nov 1 | at | W 21–17 | 53% |
| Nov 7 | vs | W 38–17 | 77% |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 26–21 | 60% |
| Nov 22 | at | L 27–42 | 29% |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 29–10 | 84% |
| Dec 30Bowls & playoff | vs | L 27–30 | 56% |
Elo: a pregame chance from scores alone.
How it ended: Lost to TCU 30–27 in the Alamo Bowl; No. 20 in the final AP poll; tied for 4th in the Big Ten.
In program history: The 51st-best season in program history by end-of-season Elo (of 112 on file).
AP poll, week by week
- Wk 4: 25
- Wk 5: 21
- Wk 8: 20
- Wk 10: 23
- Wk 11: 20
- Wk 12: 17
- Wk 13: 16
- Wk 14: 19
- Wk 15: 17
- Wk 16: 16
- Final: 20
- Record
- 9–4
- Conference
- 7–2 tied for 4th in Big Ten
- AP final
- No. 20 peak No. 16
- Points
- 465–299
- Coach
- Lincoln Riley
- Elo
- 1662 +89 this season
- SP+ rating
- 16.9 No. 16 of 136; offense No. 9, defense No. 36, special teams No. 97
- SRS
- 15.5 No. 13 of 136 in FBS
- Returning
- 37% of last season’s EPA, No. 65 of 134
- Recruiting class
- No. 14 roster talent No. 17 in FBS
- Offensive coordinator
- Luke Huard
- Defensive coordinators
- D’Anton Lynn and Eric Henderson
- Offense
- Power raid
- Defense
- 4–3
How good, play by play
| EPA per play | Success | Explosiveness | FBS rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offense | 0.30 | 49% | 1.37 | 3rd of 136 |
| Defense | 0.08 | 45% | 1.16 | 64th of 136 |
| Opponent-adjusted | 0.28 off 0.05 def | 49% off 43% def | — | 5th off 45th def |
Passing and running
| Pass success | Depth of target | Deep throws | Line yards | Stuffed | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offense | 54% | 10.4 yds | 21% | 3.30 | 14% |
| Defense | 45% | 5.7 yds | 10% | 3.40 | 15% |
How these are measured
Play-weighted averages over games against FBS opponents; raw numbers, not adjusted for the strength of the opponent. EPA (expected points added) measures how much each play changed the expected score; success rate counts plays that kept the offense on schedule; explosiveness is the average EPA on successful plays. Lower is better on defense. Ranked by EPA per play among teams that were FBS that season. The opponent-adjusted row (offense / defense) is CollegeFootballData.com’s WEPA, which accounts for who each team played. Passing and running: depth of target is how far downfield passes traveled in the air; deep throws are the share thrown deep, of the passes whose depth and direction the play-by-play describes (about half); line yards are the running yards per carry credited to the blockers; stuffed is the share of carries stopped at or behind the line. The defense’s line is what its opponents did. From CollegeFootballData.com, 2025 on.
Drives and havoc
| Points per trip inside the 40 | Average start | Havoc | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offense | 4.7 | own 27 | 13% allowed |
| Defense | 3.5 | own 27 | 16% caused |
CORE rating 23.7, 8th of 136 (offense 17.9, defense -5.8).
A trip inside the 40 is a drive that reaches the opponent’s 40-yard line; points per trip is how many it scored on average (allowed, on defense). Average start is where drives began (the defense’s line is where its opponents started). Havoc is the share of plays ending in a tackle for loss, a forced fumble, an interception or a pass broken up. CORE is CollegeFootballData.com’s context- and opponent-adjusted rating (points better than an average team; lower is better on defense). From CollegeFootballData.com.
Leaders
| Passing yards | Jayden Maiava QB | 3,711 yds |
| Passing touchdowns | Jayden Maiava QB | 24 TD |
| Rushing yards | King Miller RB | 972 yds |
| Rushing touchdowns | King Miller RB | 8 TD |
| Receiving yards | Makai Lemon WR | 1,156 yds |
| Receiving touchdowns | Makai Lemon WR | 11 TD |
| Tackles | Desman Stephens II LB | 86 tkl |
| Sacks | Kameryn Fountain DE | 5.5 sacks |
| Interceptions | Bishop Fitzgerald S | 5 INT |
Top recruits in the 2025 class
| Husan Longstreet QB | ★★★★★ | No. 25 |
| Jahkeem Stewart DL | ★★★★ | No. 34 |
| Matai Tagoa’i LB | ★★★★ | No. 102 |
| R.J. Sermons CB | ★★★★ | No. 105 |
| Aaron Dunn OT | ★★★★ | No. 166 |
| Alex Payne OT | ★★★★ | No. 182 |
| Trestin Castro CB | ★★★★ | No. 237 |
| Kendarius Reddick S | ★★★★ | No. 318 |
247Sports composite rankings via CollegeFootballData.com; national rank in the class.
The 2025 class by position
| Signed | Stars | Rating | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quarterbacks | 1 | 5.0 | 0.987 |
| Running backs | 2 | 3.5 | 0.888 |
| Receivers | 3 | 4.0 | 0.898 |
| Offensive line | 4 | 3.5 | 0.902 |
| Defensive line | 5 | 3.2 | 0.894 |
| Linebackers | 2 | 3.5 | 0.914 |
| Defensive backs | 5 | 3.8 | 0.910 |
| Athletes and specialists | 3 | 3.0 | 0.858 |
| Whole class | 25 | 3.6 | 0.899 |
High-school signees by position group, with their average stars and 247Sports composite rating (out of 1), via CollegeFootballData.com. Athletes are signees with no set position.
Drafted in 2026
The 2026 draft| Rd 1 | Makai Lemon WR | Philadelphia Eagles |
| Rd 3 | Ja’Kobi Lane WR | Baltimore Ravens |
| Rd 5 | Kamari Ramsey S | Houston Texans |
Roster 114
The 2025 roster114 players, with numbers, heights, hometowns and each player’s 2025 line; 74 have a stat line. See the roster
Transfers in 15
The 2025 portal| ★★★★ | from | |
| ★★★★ | from | |
| ★★★★ | from | |
| ★★★★ | from | |
| ★★★ | from | |
| ★★★ | from | |
| ★★★ | from | |
| ★★★ | from | |
| ★★★ | from | |
| ★★★ | from | |
| ★★★ | from | |
| ★★★ | from |
And 3 more, lower-rated or unrated.
Transfers out 28
| ★★★★ | to | |
| ★★★★ | to | |
| ★★★★ | to | |
| ★★★★ | to | |
| ★★★★ | to | |
| ★★★★ | to | |
| ★★★★ | to | |
| ★★★ | to | |
| ★★★ | to | |
| ★★★ | to | |
| ★★★ | to | |
| ★★★ | to |
And 16 more, lower-rated or unrated.
All-Big Ten
2 first team, 1 second teamFirst team
Makai LemonWRCoaches-1; Media-1
Bishop FitzgeraldDBCoaches-1; Media-1
Second team
Lake McReeTECoaches-2; Media-2
From Wikipedia’s 2025 all-conference team article, with the selectors that named each player (AP-1: the Associated Press’s first team).
2025 Big Ten standings
Conference page| Team | Conf. | Overall | AP final |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9–0 | 16–0 | 1 | |
| 9–0 | 12–2 | 5 | |
| 8–1 | 13–2 | 4 | |
| 7–2 | 9–4 | 21 | |
| 7–2 | 9–4 | 20 | |
| 6–3 | 9–4 | 17 | |
| 5–4 | 9–4 | ||
| 5–4 | 9–4 | ||
| 5–4 | 8–5 | ||
| 4–5 | 7–6 | ||
| 4–5 | 7–6 | ||
| 3–6 | 7–6 | ||
| 3–6 | 3–9 | ||
| 2–7 | 5–7 | ||
| 2–7 | 4–8 | ||
| 1–8 | 4–8 | ||
| 1–8 | 4–8 | ||
| 0–9 | 2–10 |
Ordered by conference winning percentage, then conference wins. Division splits and tiebreakers aren’t applied.