
2025 Washington
9–4 (5–4 Big Ten), coached by Jedd Fisch. Share
Schedule and results
- Best winBeat No. 23 Illinois 42–25Oct 25
Over the best-ranked team it beat, at home.
- Most excitingBeat Rutgers 38–19Oct 10
The win probability swung the most, by CollegeFootballData.com’s excitement index.
| Date | Opponent | Result | Elo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30 | vs | W 38–21 | 70% |
| Sep 6 | vs | W 70–10 | 78% |
| Sep 20 | at | W 59–24 | 58% |
| Sep 27 | vs | L 6–24 | 37% |
| Oct 4 | at | W 24–20 | 52% |
| Oct 10 | vs | W 38–19 | 72% |
| Oct 18 | at | L 7–24 | 45% |
| Oct 25 | vs | W 42–25 | 60% |
| Nov 8 | at | L 10–13 | 71% |
| Nov 15 | vs | W 49–13 | 87% |
| Nov 22 | at | W 48–14 | 67% |
| Nov 29 | vs | L 14–26 | 38% |
| Dec 13Bowls & playoff | vs | W 38–10 | 51% |
Elo: a pregame chance from scores alone.
How it ended: Beat Boise State 38–10 in the LA Bowl; unranked in the final AP poll; tied for 7th in the Big Ten.
In program history: The 17th-best season in program history by end-of-season Elo (of 112 on file).
AP poll, week by week
- Wk 11: 24
- Record
- 9–4
- Conference
- 5–4 tied for 7th in Big Ten
- AP final
- Unranked peak No. 24
- Points
- 443–243
- Coach
- Jedd Fisch
- Elo
- 1671 +92 this season
- SP+ rating
- 18.4 No. 13 of 136; offense No. 20, defense No. 9, special teams No. 93
- SRS
- 17.4 No. 8 of 136 in FBS
- Returning
- 42% of last season’s EPA, No. 53 of 134
- Recruiting class
- No. 23 roster talent No. 37 in FBS
- Offensive coordinator
- Jimmie Dougherty
- Defensive coordinator
- Ryan Walters
- Offense
- Pro-style
- Defense
- Multiple 4–2–5
How good, play by play
| EPA per play | Success | Explosiveness | FBS rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offense | 0.19 | 48% | 1.22 | 23rd of 136 |
| Defense | -0.02 | 39% | 1.21 | 21st of 136 |
| Opponent-adjusted | 0.18 off -0.02 def | 48% off 37% def | — | 24th off 19th def |
Passing and running
| Pass success | Depth of target | Deep throws | Line yards | Stuffed | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offense | 54% | 9.2 yds | 16% | 3.40 | 14% |
| Defense | 41% | 9.2 yds | 17% | 2.80 | 15% |
How these are measured
Play-weighted averages over games against FBS opponents; raw numbers, not adjusted for the strength of the opponent. EPA (expected points added) measures how much each play changed the expected score; success rate counts plays that kept the offense on schedule; explosiveness is the average EPA on successful plays. Lower is better on defense. Ranked by EPA per play among teams that were FBS that season. The opponent-adjusted row (offense / defense) is CollegeFootballData.com’s WEPA, which accounts for who each team played. Passing and running: depth of target is how far downfield passes traveled in the air; deep throws are the share thrown deep, of the passes whose depth and direction the play-by-play describes (about half); line yards are the running yards per carry credited to the blockers; stuffed is the share of carries stopped at or behind the line. The defense’s line is what its opponents did. From CollegeFootballData.com, 2025 on.
Drives and havoc
| Points per trip inside the 40 | Average start | Havoc | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offense | 4.6 | own 29 | 14% allowed |
| Defense | 2.9 | own 30 | 15% caused |
CORE rating 22.7, 9th of 136 (offense 12.8, defense -9.8).
A trip inside the 40 is a drive that reaches the opponent’s 40-yard line; points per trip is how many it scored on average (allowed, on defense). Average start is where drives began (the defense’s line is where its opponents started). Havoc is the share of plays ending in a tackle for loss, a forced fumble, an interception or a pass broken up. CORE is CollegeFootballData.com’s context- and opponent-adjusted rating (points better than an average team; lower is better on defense). From CollegeFootballData.com.
Leaders
| Passing yards | Demond Williams Jr. QB | 3,065 yds |
| Passing touchdowns | Demond Williams Jr. QB | 25 TD |
| Rushing yards | Jonah Coleman RB | 758 yds |
| Rushing touchdowns | Jonah Coleman RB | 15 TD |
| Receiving yards | Denzel Boston WR | 881 yds |
| Receiving touchdowns | Denzel Boston WR | 11 TD |
| Tackles | Alex McLaughlin S | 94 tkl |
| Sacks | Jacob Lane DE | 4 sacks |
| Interceptions | Alex McLaughlin S | 2 INT |
Top recruits in the 2025 class
| Zaydrius Rainey-Sale LB | ★★★★ | No. 100 |
| Dylan Robinson ATH | ★★★★ | No. 140 |
| Rylon Dillard-Allen S | ★★★★ | No. 177 |
| Champ Taulealea OL | ★★★★ | No. 341 |
| Marcus Harris WR | ★★★★ | No. 354 |
| Chris Lawson WR | ★★★★ | No. 381 |
| Jonathan Epperson Jr. LB | ★★★★ | No. 439 |
| John Mills OT | ★★★★ | No. 468 |
247Sports composite rankings via CollegeFootballData.com; national rank in the class.
The 2025 class by position
| Signed | Stars | Rating | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quarterbacks | 2 | 3.0 | 0.882 |
| Running backs | 2 | 3.0 | 0.867 |
| Receivers | 7 | 3.3 | 0.881 |
| Offensive line | 5 | 3.4 | 0.880 |
| Defensive line | 4 | 3.0 | 0.867 |
| Linebackers | 3 | 3.7 | 0.904 |
| Defensive backs | 3 | 3.3 | 0.888 |
| Athletes and specialists | 3 | 3.3 | 0.865 |
| Whole class | 29 | 3.3 | 0.879 |
High-school signees by position group, with their average stars and 247Sports composite rating (out of 1), via CollegeFootballData.com. Athletes are signees with no set position.
Drafted in 2026
The 2026 draft| Rd 2 | Denzel Boston WR | Cleveland Browns |
| Rd 3 | Tacario Davis CB | Cincinnati Bengals |
| Rd 4 | Jonah Coleman RB | Denver Broncos |
| Rd 4 | Carver Willis OT | San Francisco 49ers |
| Rd 4 | Ephesians Prysock CB | San Francisco 49ers |
| Rd 6 | Anterio Thompson DT | Atlanta Falcons |
| Rd 7 | Zach Durfee DE | Jacksonville Jaguars |
Roster 105
The 2025 roster105 players, with numbers, heights, hometowns and each player’s 2025 line; 55 have a stat line. See the roster
Transfers in 18
The 2025 portal| ★★★★ | from | |
| ★★★ | from | |
| ★★★ | from | |
| ★★★ | from | |
| ★★★ | from | |
| ★★★ | from | |
| ★★★ | from | |
| ★★★ | from | |
| ★★★ | from | |
| ★★★ | from | |
| ★★★ | from | |
| ★★★ | from |
And 6 more, lower-rated or unrated.
Transfers out 32
| ★★★★ | to | |
| ★★★★ | to | |
| ★★★ | to | |
| ★★★ | to | |
| ★★★ | to | |
| ★★★ | to | |
| ★★★ | to | |
| ★★★ | to | |
| ★★★ | to | |
| ★★★ | to | |
| ★★★ | to | |
| ★★★ | to |
And 20 more, lower-rated or unrated.
2025 Big Ten standings
Conference page| Team | Conf. | Overall | AP final |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9–0 | 16–0 | 1 | |
| 9–0 | 12–2 | 5 | |
| 8–1 | 13–2 | 4 | |
| 7–2 | 9–4 | 21 | |
| 7–2 | 9–4 | 20 | |
| 6–3 | 9–4 | 17 | |
| 5–4 | 9–4 | ||
| 5–4 | 9–4 | ||
| 5–4 | 8–5 | ||
| 4–5 | 7–6 | ||
| 4–5 | 7–6 | ||
| 3–6 | 7–6 | ||
| 3–6 | 3–9 | ||
| 2–7 | 5–7 | ||
| 2–7 | 4–8 | ||
| 1–8 | 4–8 | ||
| 1–8 | 4–8 | ||
| 0–9 | 2–10 |
Ordered by conference winning percentage, then conference wins. Division splits and tiebreakers aren’t applied.