2025 Maryland

4–⁠8 (1–⁠8 Big Ten), coached by Mike Locksley.

Schedule and results

Maryland in 2025, game by game: won vs. Florida Atlantic 39–7; won vs. Northern Illinois 20–9; won vs. Towson 44–17; won at Wisconsin 27–10; lost vs. Washington 20–24; lost vs. Nebraska 31–34; lost at UCLA 17–20; lost vs. No. 2 Indiana 10–55; lost at Rutgers 20–35; lost at Illinois 6–24; lost vs. No. 18 Michigan 20–45; lost vs. Michigan State 28–38+32−45Won 39–7 vs. Florida Atlantic+32Florida AtlanticWon 20–9 vs. Northern Illinois+11Northern Illino…Won 44–17 vs. Towson+27TowsonWon 27–10 at Wisconsin+17WisconsinLost 20–24 vs. Washington-4WashingtonLost 31–34 vs. Nebraska-3NebraskaLost 17–20 at UCLA-3UCLALost 10–55 vs. No. 2 Indiana-45No. 2 IndianaLost 20–35 at Rutgers-15RutgersLost 6–24 at Illinois-18IllinoisLost 20–45 vs. No. 18 Michigan-25No. 18 MichiganLost 28–38 vs. Michigan State-10Michigan State
Each game’s margin, wins above the line and losses below.

Elo: a pregame chance from scores alone.

How it ended: Lost to Michigan State 38–⁠28; unranked in the final AP poll; tied for 16th in the Big Ten.

In program history: The 92nd-best season in program history by end-of-season Elo (of 120 on file).

Record
4–⁠8
Conference
1–⁠8 tied for 16th in Big Ten
AP final
Unranked
Points
282–⁠318
Coach
Mike Locksley
Elo
1409 −49 this season
SP+ rating
0.6 No. 75 of 136; offense No. 90, defense No. 55, special teams No. 39
SRS
−0.8 No. 71 of 136 in FBS
Returning
13% of last season’s EPA, No. 119 of 134
Recruiting class
No. 25 roster talent No. 52 in FBS
Offensive coordinator
Pep Hamilton
Defensive coordinators
Ted Monachino and Aazaar Abdul-Rahim
Offense
West Coast
Defense
3–⁠4

How good, play by play

  • Offense103rd of 136
  • Defense53rd of 136
  • Offense, opponent-adjusted109th of 136
  • Defense, opponent-adjusted46th of 136
EPA per playSuccessExplosivenessFBS rank
Offense0.0138%1.30103rd of 136
Defense0.0644%1.2353rd of 136
Opponent-adjusted0.01 off
0.05 def
37% off
43% def
—109th off
46th def

Passing and running

Pass successDepth of targetDeep throwsLine yardsStuffed
Offense41%8.4 yds12%2.8018%
Defense45%8.1 yds15%3.3014%
How these are measured

Play-weighted averages over games against FBS opponents; raw numbers, not adjusted for the strength of the opponent. EPA (expected points added) measures how much each play changed the expected score; success rate counts plays that kept the offense on schedule; explosiveness is the average EPA on successful plays. Lower is better on defense. Ranked by EPA per play among teams that were FBS that season. The opponent-adjusted row (offense / defense) is CollegeFootballData.com’s WEPA, which accounts for who each team played. Passing and running: depth of target is how far downfield passes traveled in the air; deep throws are the share thrown deep, of the passes whose depth and direction the play-by-play describes (about half); line yards are the running yards per carry credited to the blockers; stuffed is the share of carries stopped at or behind the line. The defense’s line is what its opponents did. From CollegeFootballData.com, 2025 on.

Drives and havoc

Points per trip inside the 40Average startHavoc
Offense3.4own 3014% allowed
Defense3.6own 2914% caused

CORE rating -7.4, 93rd of 136 (offense -8.3, defense -0.9).

A trip inside the 40 is a drive that reaches the opponent’s 40-yard line; points per trip is how many it scored on average (allowed, on defense). Average start is where drives began (the defense’s line is where its opponents started). Havoc is the share of plays ending in a tackle for loss, a forced fumble, an interception or a pass broken up. CORE is CollegeFootballData.com’s context- and opponent-adjusted rating (points better than an average team; lower is better on defense). From CollegeFootballData.com.

Leaders

Passing yardsMalik Washington QB2,963 yds
Passing touchdownsMalik Washington QB17 TD
Rushing yardsDeJuan Williams RB501 yds
Rushing touchdownsMalik Washington QB4 TD
Receiving yardsShaleak Knotts WR717 yds
Receiving touchdownsShaleak Knotts WR6 TD
TacklesDaniel Wingate LB102 tkl
SacksSidney Stewart DL7 sacks
InterceptionsJalen Huskey DB4 INT

Top recruits in the 2025 class

Malik Washington QB★★★★No. 99
Jaylen Gilchrist OL★★★★No. 111
Zahir Mathis DE★★★★No. 123
Bryce Jenkins DL★★★★No. 290
Messiah Delhomme S★★★★No. 314
Zymear Smith ATH★★★★No. 324

247Sports composite rankings via CollegeFootballData.com; national rank in the class.

The 2025 class by position

SignedStarsRating
Quarterbacks23.50.894
Running backs23.00.877
Receivers23.00.866
Offensive line43.30.884
Defensive line63.30.878
Linebackers23.00.877
Defensive backs23.50.883
Athletes and specialists14.00.902
Whole class213.30.881

High-school signees by position group, with their average stars and 247Sports composite rating (out of 1), via CollegeFootballData.com. Athletes are signees with no set position.

Drafted in 2026

The 2026 draft
Rd 3Jalen Huskey CBJacksonville Jaguars

Roster 105

The 2025 roster

105 players, with numbers, heights, hometowns and each player’s 2025 line; 59 have a stat line. See the roster

Transfers in 15

The 2025 portal

And 3 more, lower-rated or unrated.

Transfers out 31

And 19 more, lower-rated or unrated.

All-Big Ten

1 first team, 2 second team

First team

Second team

From Wikipedia’s 2025 all-conference team article, with the selectors that named each player (AP-1: the Associated Press’s first team).

2025 Big Ten standings

Conference page
TeamConf.OverallAP final
Indiana9–⁠016–⁠01
Ohio State9–⁠012–⁠25
Oregon8–⁠113–⁠24
Michigan7–⁠29–⁠421
USC7–⁠29–⁠420
Iowa6–⁠39–⁠417
Illinois5–⁠49–⁠4
Washington5–⁠49–⁠4
Minnesota5–⁠48–⁠5
Nebraska4–⁠57–⁠6
Northwestern4–⁠57–⁠6
Penn State3–⁠67–⁠6
UCLA3–⁠63–⁠9
Rutgers2–⁠75–⁠7
Wisconsin2–⁠74–⁠8
Michigan State1–⁠84–⁠8
Maryland1–⁠84–⁠8
Purdue0–⁠92–⁠10

Ordered by conference winning percentage, then conference wins. Division splits and tiebreakers aren’t applied.