2025 UCLA

3–⁠9 (3–⁠6 Big Ten), coached by Deshaun Foster, then Tim Skipper (interim, remainder of season).

Schedule and results

UCLA in 2025, game by game: lost vs. Utah 10–43; lost at UNLV 23–30; lost vs. New Mexico 10–35; lost at Northwestern 14–17; won vs. No. 7 Penn State 42–37; won at Michigan State 38–13; won vs. Maryland 20–17; lost at No. 2 Indiana 6–56; lost vs. Nebraska 21–28; lost at No. 1 Ohio State 10–48; lost vs. Washington 14–48; lost at No. 19 USC 10–29+25−50Lost 10–43 vs. Utah-33UtahLost 23–30 at UNLV-7UNLVLost 10–35 vs. New Mexico-25New MexicoLost 14–17 at Northwestern-3NorthwesternWon 42–37 vs. No. 7 Penn State+5No. 7 Penn StateWon 38–13 at Michigan State+25Michigan StateWon 20–17 vs. Maryland+3MarylandLost 6–56 at No. 2 Indiana-50No. 2 IndianaLost 21–28 vs. Nebraska-7NebraskaLost 10–48 at No. 1 Ohio State-38No. 1 Ohio StateLost 14–48 vs. Washington-34WashingtonLost 10–29 at No. 19 USC-19No. 19 USC
Each game’s margin, wins above the line and losses below; orange marks an upset win.

Elo: a pregame chance from scores alone.

How it ended: Lost to USC 29–⁠10; unranked in the final AP poll; tied for 12th in the Big Ten.

In program history: The 91st-best season in program history by end-of-season Elo (of 102 on file).

Record
3–⁠9
Conference
3–⁠6 tied for 12th in Big Ten
AP final
Unranked
Points
218–⁠401
Coach
Deshaun Foster, then Tim Skipper (interim, remainder of season)
Elo
1427 −81 this season
SP+ rating
-8.7 No. 98 of 136; offense No. 105, defense No. 94, special teams No. 69
SRS
−1.1 No. 75 of 136 in FBS
Returning
22% of last season’s EPA, No. 93 of 134
Recruiting class
No. 46 roster talent No. 26 in FBS
Offensive coordinators
Tino Sunseri and Jerry Neuheisel
Defensive coordinators
Ikaika Malloe and Kevin Coyle
Offense
Spread
Defense
4–⁠3

How good, play by play

  • Offense85th of 136
  • Defense124th of 136
  • Offense, opponent-adjusted63rd of 136
  • Defense, opponent-adjusted91st of 136
EPA per playSuccessExplosivenessFBS rank
Offense0.0541%1.1685th of 136
Defense0.2250%1.15124th of 136
Opponent-adjusted0.10 off
0.13 def
42% off
46% def
—63rd off
91st def

Passing and running

Pass successDepth of targetDeep throwsLine yardsStuffed
Offense42%6.5 yds8%3.0017%
Defense49%8.0 yds11%3.5011%
How these are measured

Play-weighted averages over games against FBS opponents; raw numbers, not adjusted for the strength of the opponent. EPA (expected points added) measures how much each play changed the expected score; success rate counts plays that kept the offense on schedule; explosiveness is the average EPA on successful plays. Lower is better on defense. Ranked by EPA per play among teams that were FBS that season. The opponent-adjusted row (offense / defense) is CollegeFootballData.com’s WEPA, which accounts for who each team played. Passing and running: depth of target is how far downfield passes traveled in the air; deep throws are the share thrown deep, of the passes whose depth and direction the play-by-play describes (about half); line yards are the running yards per carry credited to the blockers; stuffed is the share of carries stopped at or behind the line. The defense’s line is what its opponents did. From CollegeFootballData.com, 2025 on.

Drives and havoc

Points per trip inside the 40Average startHavoc
Offense3.0own 2616% allowed
Defense4.6own 3112% caused

CORE rating -0.7, 67th of 136 (offense 0.7, defense 1.4).

A trip inside the 40 is a drive that reaches the opponent’s 40-yard line; points per trip is how many it scored on average (allowed, on defense). Average start is where drives began (the defense’s line is where its opponents started). Havoc is the share of plays ending in a tackle for loss, a forced fumble, an interception or a pass broken up. CORE is CollegeFootballData.com’s context- and opponent-adjusted rating (points better than an average team; lower is better on defense). From CollegeFootballData.com.

Leaders

Passing yardsNico Iamaleava QB1,928 yds
Passing touchdownsNico Iamaleava QB13 TD
Rushing yardsNico Iamaleava QB505 yds
Rushing touchdownsNico Iamaleava QB4 TD
Receiving yardsKwazi Gilmer WR535 yds
Receiving touchdownsKwazi Gilmer WR4 TD
TacklesJonJon Vaughns LB107 tkl
SacksAnthony Jones DE1.5 sacks
InterceptionsScooter Jackson DB2 INT

Top recruits in the 2025 class

Karson Cox RB★★★★No. 291
Jadyn Hudson S★★★★No. 439
Robert McDaniel QB★★★No. 507
LaRue Zamorano III CB★★★No. 615
Garrison Blank OT★★★No. 619

247Sports composite rankings via CollegeFootballData.com; national rank in the class.

The 2025 class by position

SignedStarsRating
Quarterbacks23.00.873
Running backs14.00.907
Receivers53.00.869
Offensive line23.00.868
Defensive line63.00.867
Defensive backs43.30.878
Athletes and specialists23.00.816
Whole class223.10.867

High-school signees by position group, with their average stars and 247Sports composite rating (out of 1), via CollegeFootballData.com. Athletes are signees with no set position.

Roster 107

The 2025 roster

107 players, with numbers, heights, hometowns and each player’s 2025 line; 54 have a stat line. See the roster

Transfers in 30

The 2025 portal

And 18 more, lower-rated or unrated.

Transfers out 35

And 23 more, lower-rated or unrated.

2025 Big Ten standings

Conference page
TeamConf.OverallAP final
Indiana9–⁠016–⁠01
Ohio State9–⁠012–⁠25
Oregon8–⁠113–⁠24
Michigan7–⁠29–⁠421
USC7–⁠29–⁠420
Iowa6–⁠39–⁠417
Illinois5–⁠49–⁠4
Washington5–⁠49–⁠4
Minnesota5–⁠48–⁠5
Nebraska4–⁠57–⁠6
Northwestern4–⁠57–⁠6
Penn State3–⁠67–⁠6
UCLA3–⁠63–⁠9
Rutgers2–⁠75–⁠7
Wisconsin2–⁠74–⁠8
Michigan State1–⁠84–⁠8
Maryland1–⁠84–⁠8
Purdue0–⁠92–⁠10

Ordered by conference winning percentage, then conference wins. Division splits and tiebreakers aren’t applied.