2026 UCLA

6–⁠0 (4–⁠0 Big Ten), coached by Bob Chesney. The season’s Wikipedia article records 5–⁠0, over five games to the six on file here.

Schedule and results

UCLA in 2026, game by game: won at California 45–24; won vs. San Diego State 28–10; won vs. Purdue 52–38; won at Maryland 54–3; won at No. 13 Oregon 17–15; won vs. Wisconsin 17–7+51Won 45–24 at California+21CaliforniaWon 28–10 vs. San Diego State+18San Diego StateWon 52–38 vs. Purdue+14PurdueWon 54–3 at Maryland+51MarylandWon 17–15 at No. 13 Oregon+2No. 13 OregonWon 17–7 vs. Wisconsin+10Wisconsin
Each game’s margin, wins above the line and losses below; orange marks an upset win.
DateOpponentResultElo
Sep 5atCaliforniaW 45–⁠2438%
Sep 12vsSan Diego StateW 28–⁠1052%
Sep 19vsPurdueW 52–⁠3874%
Sep 26atMarylandW 54–⁠351%
Oct 10at13OregonW 17–⁠1525%
Oct 17vsWisconsinW 17–⁠763%
Oct 24vsMichigan StatePreview80%
Oct 31vsNevadaPreview81%
Nov 7atMinnesotaPreview53%
Nov 13vsIllinoisPreview68%
Nov 21atMichiganPreview41%
Nov 28vsUSCPreview49%

Elo: a pregame chance from scores alone.

AP poll, week by week

  1. Wk 5: 23
  2. Wk 6: 21
  3. Wk 7: 12
Record
6–⁠0
Conference
4–⁠0 shared first in Big Ten
AP now
No. 12 in the week 7 poll; peak No. 12
Points
213–⁠97
Coach
Bob Chesney
Elo
1606 +155 this season
SP+ rating
15.3 No. 18 of 138; offense No. 24, defense No. 25, special teams No. 45
SRS
18.9 No. 10 of 138 in FBS
Returning
57% of last season’s EPA, No. 48 of 136
Recruiting class
No. 62 roster talent No. 25 in FBS
Offensive coordinator
Dean Kennedy
Defensive coordinator
Colin Hitschler
Offense
Spread
Defense
4–⁠2–⁠5

How good, play by play

  • Offense38th of 138
  • Defense1st of 138
  • Offense, opponent-adjusted31st of 138
  • Defense, opponent-adjusted1st of 138
EPA per playSuccessExplosivenessFBS rank
Offense0.1945%1.1938th of 138
Defense-0.1833%1.091st of 138
Opponent-adjusted0.17 off
-0.06 def
46% off
36% def
—31st off
1st def

Passing and running

Pass successDepth of targetDeep throwsLine yardsStuffed
Offense43%9.2 yds17%3.4012%
Defense31%9.3 yds17%2.6022%
How these are measured

Play-weighted averages over games against FBS opponents; raw numbers, not adjusted for the strength of the opponent. EPA (expected points added) measures how much each play changed the expected score; success rate counts plays that kept the offense on schedule; explosiveness is the average EPA on successful plays. Lower is better on defense. Ranked by EPA per play among teams that were FBS that season. The opponent-adjusted row (offense / defense) is CollegeFootballData.com’s WEPA, which accounts for who each team played. Passing and running: depth of target is how far downfield passes traveled in the air; deep throws are the share thrown deep, of the passes whose depth and direction the play-by-play describes (about half); line yards are the running yards per carry credited to the blockers; stuffed is the share of carries stopped at or behind the line. The defense’s line is what its opponents did. From CollegeFootballData.com, 2025 on.

Drives and havoc

Points per trip inside the 40Average startHavoc
Offense3.8own 3415% allowed
Defense2.6own 2420% caused

CORE rating 21.6, 8th of 138 (offense 5.8, defense -15.8).

A trip inside the 40 is a drive that reaches the opponent’s 40-yard line; points per trip is how many it scored on average (allowed, on defense). Average start is where drives began (the defense’s line is where its opponents started). Havoc is the share of plays ending in a tackle for loss, a forced fumble, an interception or a pass broken up. CORE is CollegeFootballData.com’s context- and opponent-adjusted rating (points better than an average team; lower is better on defense). From CollegeFootballData.com.

Leaders

Passing yardsNico Iamaleava QB982 yds
Passing touchdownsNico Iamaleava QB4 TD
Rushing yardsWayne Knight RB571 yds
Rushing touchdownsWayne Knight RB11 TD
Receiving yardsSemaj Morgan WR313 yds
Receiving touchdownsSemaj Morgan WR2 TD
TacklesJalen Woods LB51 tkl
SacksSamuel Omosigho LB3 sacks
InterceptionsTa’Shawn James DB4 INT

Top recruits in the 2026 class

Kenneth Moore III WR★★★★No. 438
Jonah Smith WR★★★★No. 390
Quinn Buckey OT★★★No. 608
Camden Jensen OT★★★No. 634
Cooper Javorsky OL★★★No. 704

247Sports composite rankings via CollegeFootballData.com; national rank in the class.

The 2026 class by position

SignedStarsRating
Quarterbacks13.00.873
Running backs13.00.874
Receivers43.50.874
Offensive line53.00.868
Defensive line23.00.873
Linebackers23.00.862
Defensive backs23.00.866
Athletes and specialists13.00.807
Whole class183.10.866

High-school signees by position group, with their average stars and 247Sports composite rating (out of 1), via CollegeFootballData.com. Athletes are signees with no set position.

Roster 120

The 2026 roster

120 players, with numbers, heights, hometowns and each player’s 2026 line; 54 have a stat line. See the roster

2026 Big Ten standings

Conference page
TeamConf.OverallAP final
UCLA4–⁠06–⁠0
Ohio State4–⁠06–⁠1
USC3–⁠16–⁠1
Indiana3–⁠16–⁠1
Iowa2–⁠15–⁠1
Northwestern2–⁠15–⁠1
Oregon2–⁠14–⁠2
Minnesota2–⁠14–⁠2
Wisconsin2–⁠14–⁠2
Nebraska2–⁠25–⁠2
Purdue2–⁠23–⁠4
Michigan1–⁠24–⁠2
Illinois1–⁠23–⁠3
Rutgers1–⁠22–⁠4
Washington1–⁠34–⁠3
Penn State0–⁠43–⁠4
Michigan State0–⁠42–⁠5
Maryland0–⁠42–⁠5

Ordered by conference winning percentage, then conference wins. Division splits and tiebreakers aren’t applied.