2026 USC

6–⁠1 (3–⁠1 Big Ten), coached by Lincoln Riley.

Schedule and results

USC in 2026, game by game: won vs. San José State 42–26; won vs. Fresno State 39–0; won vs. Louisiana 49–30; won at Rutgers 42–35; lost vs. No. 20 Oregon 27–41; won vs. Washington 25–21; won at Penn State 31–23+39−14Won 42–26 vs. San José State+16San José StateWon 39–0 vs. Fresno State+39Fresno StateWon 49–30 vs. Louisiana+19LouisianaWon 42–35 at Rutgers+7RutgersLost 27–41 vs. No. 20 Oregon-14No. 20 OregonWon 25–21 vs. Washington+4WashingtonWon 31–23 at Penn State+8Penn State
Each game’s margin, wins above the line and losses below.

Elo: a pregame chance from scores alone.

AP poll, week by week

  1. Wk 1: 14
  2. Wk 2: 14
  3. Wk 3: 12
  4. Wk 4: 12
  5. Wk 5: 18
  6. Wk 6: 19
  7. Wk 7: 19
Record
6–⁠1
Conference
3–⁠1 tied for 3rd in Big Ten
AP now
No. 19 in the week 7 poll; peak No. 12
Points
255–⁠176
Coach
Lincoln Riley
Elo
1669 +61 this season
SP+ rating
14.4 No. 21 of 138; offense No. 9, defense No. 54, special teams No. 45
SRS
7.5 No. 41 of 138 in FBS
Returning
59% of last season’s EPA, No. 42 of 136
Recruiting class
No. 1 roster talent No. 9 in FBS
Offensive coordinator
Luke Huard
Defensive coordinator
Gary Patterson
Captains
Jayden Maiava, Kilian O’Connor, Tobias Raymond, Jide Abasiri and Alex VanSumeren
Offense
Power raid
Defense
4–⁠2–⁠5

How good, play by play

  • Offense6th of 138
  • Defense83rd of 138
  • Offense, opponent-adjusted5th of 138
  • Defense, opponent-adjusted104th of 138
EPA per playSuccessExplosivenessFBS rank
Offense0.3152%1.246th of 138
Defense0.1441%1.2983rd of 138
Opponent-adjusted0.25 off
0.15 def
49% off
43% def
—5th off
104th def

Passing and running

Pass successDepth of targetDeep throwsLine yardsStuffed
Offense58%8.7 yds12%3.3015%
Defense46%8.9 yds11%2.8015%
How these are measured

Play-weighted averages over games against FBS opponents; raw numbers, not adjusted for the strength of the opponent. EPA (expected points added) measures how much each play changed the expected score; success rate counts plays that kept the offense on schedule; explosiveness is the average EPA on successful plays. Lower is better on defense. Ranked by EPA per play among teams that were FBS that season. The opponent-adjusted row (offense / defense) is CollegeFootballData.com’s WEPA, which accounts for who each team played. Passing and running: depth of target is how far downfield passes traveled in the air; deep throws are the share thrown deep, of the passes whose depth and direction the play-by-play describes (about half); line yards are the running yards per carry credited to the blockers; stuffed is the share of carries stopped at or behind the line. The defense’s line is what its opponents did. From CollegeFootballData.com, 2025 on.

Drives and havoc

Points per trip inside the 40Average startHavoc
Offense4.4own 2910% allowed
Defense4.2own 2612% caused

CORE rating 9.7, 29th of 138 (offense 17.3, defense 7.7).

A trip inside the 40 is a drive that reaches the opponent’s 40-yard line; points per trip is how many it scored on average (allowed, on defense). Average start is where drives began (the defense’s line is where its opponents started). Havoc is the share of plays ending in a tackle for loss, a forced fumble, an interception or a pass broken up. CORE is CollegeFootballData.com’s context- and opponent-adjusted rating (points better than an average team; lower is better on defense). From CollegeFootballData.com.

Leaders

Passing yardsJayden Maiava QB2,045 yds
Passing touchdownsJayden Maiava QB18 TD
Rushing yardsKing Miller RB595 yds
Rushing touchdownsKing Miller RB4 TD
Receiving yardsKayden Dixon-Wyatt WR400 yds
Receiving touchdownsTrent Mosley WR5 TD
TacklesChristian Pierce S40 tkl
SacksKennedy Urlacher S3 sacks
InterceptionsProphet Brown CB2 INT

Top recruits in the 2026 class

Luke Wafle DE★★★★★No. 6
Mark Bowman TE★★★★★No. 30
Jaimeon Winfield DL★★★★★No. 36
Ethan Feaster WR★★★★No. 41
Elbert Hill IV CB★★★★No. 54
Kayden Dixon-Wyatt WR★★★★No. 59
Keenyi Pepe OT★★★★No. 75
Deshonne Redeaux RB★★★★No. 87

247Sports composite rankings via CollegeFootballData.com; national rank in the class.

The 2026 class by position

SignedStarsRating
Quarterbacks14.00.952
Running backs24.00.957
Receivers73.90.934
Offensive line73.60.911
Defensive line93.90.919
Linebackers23.50.917
Defensive backs63.50.905
Whole class343.70.921

High-school signees by position group, with their average stars and 247Sports composite rating (out of 1), via CollegeFootballData.com. Athletes are signees with no set position.

Roster 127

The 2026 roster

127 players, with numbers, heights, hometowns and each player’s 2026 line; 61 have a stat line. See the roster

2026 Big Ten standings

Conference page
TeamConf.OverallAP final
UCLA4–⁠06–⁠0
Ohio State4–⁠06–⁠1
USC3–⁠16–⁠1
Indiana3–⁠16–⁠1
Iowa2–⁠15–⁠1
Northwestern2–⁠15–⁠1
Oregon2–⁠14–⁠2
Minnesota2–⁠14–⁠2
Wisconsin2–⁠14–⁠2
Nebraska2–⁠25–⁠2
Purdue2–⁠23–⁠4
Michigan1–⁠24–⁠2
Illinois1–⁠23–⁠3
Rutgers1–⁠22–⁠4
Washington1–⁠34–⁠3
Penn State0–⁠43–⁠4
Michigan State0–⁠42–⁠5
Maryland0–⁠42–⁠5

Ordered by conference winning percentage, then conference wins. Division splits and tiebreakers aren’t applied.