2026 Rutgers

2–⁠4 (1–⁠2 Big Ten), coached by Greg Schiano. The season’s Wikipedia article records 1–⁠4, over five games to the six on file here.

Schedule and results

Rutgers in 2026, game by game: lost vs. Massachusetts 21–37; lost at Boston College 21–28; lost vs. No. 12 USC 35–42; won vs. Howard 58–7; lost vs. No. 6 Indiana 15–47; won at Maryland 37–30+51−32Lost 21–37 vs. Massachusetts-16MassachusettsLost 21–28 at Boston College-7Boston CollegeLost 35–42 vs. No. 12 USC-7No. 12 USCWon 58–7 vs. Howard+51HowardLost 15–47 vs. No. 6 Indiana-32No. 6 IndianaWon 37–30 at Maryland+7Maryland
Each game’s margin, wins above the line and losses below.

Elo: a pregame chance from scores alone.

Record
2–⁠4
Conference
1–⁠2 tied for 12th in Big Ten
AP now
Unranked
Points
187–⁠191
Coach
Greg Schiano
Elo
1443 −53 this season
SP+ rating
-5.3 No. 94 of 138; offense No. 52, defense No. 125, special teams No. 29
SRS
−10.5 No. 109 of 138 in FBS
Returning
44% of last season’s EPA, No. 60 of 136
Recruiting class
No. 36 roster talent No. 48 in FBS
Offensive coordinator
Kirk Ciarrocca
Defensive coordinator
Travis Johansen
Offense
Spread
Defense
Multiple

How good, play by play

  • Offense80th of 138
  • Defense126th of 138
  • Offense, opponent-adjusted104th of 138
  • Defense, opponent-adjusted127th of 138
EPA per playSuccessExplosivenessFBS rank
Offense0.0943%1.4380th of 138
Defense0.2848%1.24126th of 138
Opponent-adjusted0.05 off
0.20 def
41% off
47% def
—104th off
127th def

Passing and running

Pass successDepth of targetDeep throwsLine yardsStuffed
Offense50%10.9 yds12%3.0016%
Defense47%10.0 yds17%3.5016%
How these are measured

Play-weighted averages over games against FBS opponents; raw numbers, not adjusted for the strength of the opponent. EPA (expected points added) measures how much each play changed the expected score; success rate counts plays that kept the offense on schedule; explosiveness is the average EPA on successful plays. Lower is better on defense. Ranked by EPA per play among teams that were FBS that season. The opponent-adjusted row (offense / defense) is CollegeFootballData.com’s WEPA, which accounts for who each team played. Passing and running: depth of target is how far downfield passes traveled in the air; deep throws are the share thrown deep, of the passes whose depth and direction the play-by-play describes (about half); line yards are the running yards per carry credited to the blockers; stuffed is the share of carries stopped at or behind the line. The defense’s line is what its opponents did. From CollegeFootballData.com, 2025 on.

Drives and havoc

Points per trip inside the 40Average startHavoc
Offense4.2own 3015% allowed
Defense4.2own 3013% caused

CORE rating -13.7, 121st of 138 (offense -4.1, defense 9.6).

A trip inside the 40 is a drive that reaches the opponent’s 40-yard line; points per trip is how many it scored on average (allowed, on defense). Average start is where drives began (the defense’s line is where its opponents started). Havoc is the share of plays ending in a tackle for loss, a forced fumble, an interception or a pass broken up. CORE is CollegeFootballData.com’s context- and opponent-adjusted rating (points better than an average team; lower is better on defense). From CollegeFootballData.com.

Leaders

Passing yardsDylan Lonergan QB1,066 yds
Passing touchdownsDylan Lonergan QB10 TD
Rushing yardsAntwan Raymond RB498 yds
Rushing touchdownsAntwan Raymond RB5 TD
Receiving yardsK.J. Duff WR741 yds
Receiving touchdownsK.J. Duff WR9 TD
TacklesBradlee Jones DB29 tkl
SacksSekou Kromah DL2 sacks
InterceptionsBradlee Jones DB2 INT

Top recruits in the 2026 class

Aiden Gibson RB★★★★No. 313
Dyzier Carter WR★★★★No. 316
Rinaldo Callaway III DE★★★★No. 379
Devonte Anderson CB★★★★No. 394
Messiah Tilson S★★★★No. 402
Wydeek Collier ATH★★★★No. 362

247Sports composite rankings via CollegeFootballData.com; national rank in the class.

The 2026 class by position

SignedStarsRating
Quarterbacks13.00.882
Running backs23.50.887
Receivers43.30.881
Offensive line73.00.872
Defensive line33.30.884
Linebackers23.00.866
Defensive backs63.30.882
Athletes and specialists14.00.896
Whole class263.20.879

High-school signees by position group, with their average stars and 247Sports composite rating (out of 1), via CollegeFootballData.com. Athletes are signees with no set position.

Roster 134

The 2026 roster

134 players, with numbers, heights, hometowns and each player’s 2026 line; 57 have a stat line. See the roster

Transfers in 16

The 2026 portal

And 4 more, lower-rated or unrated.

Transfers out 15

And 3 more, lower-rated or unrated.

2026 Big Ten standings

Conference page
TeamConf.OverallAP final
UCLA4–⁠06–⁠0
Ohio State4–⁠06–⁠1
USC3–⁠16–⁠1
Indiana3–⁠16–⁠1
Iowa2–⁠15–⁠1
Northwestern2–⁠15–⁠1
Oregon2–⁠14–⁠2
Minnesota2–⁠14–⁠2
Wisconsin2–⁠14–⁠2
Nebraska2–⁠25–⁠2
Purdue2–⁠23–⁠4
Michigan1–⁠24–⁠2
Illinois1–⁠23–⁠3
Rutgers1–⁠22–⁠4
Washington1–⁠34–⁠3
Penn State0–⁠43–⁠4
Michigan State0–⁠42–⁠5
Maryland0–⁠42–⁠5

Ordered by conference winning percentage, then conference wins. Division splits and tiebreakers aren’t applied.