2026 Iowa

5–⁠1 (2–⁠1 Big Ten), coached by Kirk Ferentz.

Schedule and results

Iowa in 2026, game by game: won vs. Northern Illinois 40–0; won vs. Iowa State 16–13; won vs. Northern Iowa 55–0; won at No. 18 Michigan 20–19; lost vs. No. 5 Ohio State 14–31; won at Washington 41–24+55−17Won 40–0 vs. Northern Illinois+40Northern Illino…Won 16–13 vs. Iowa State+3Iowa StateWon 55–0 vs. Northern Iowa+55Northern IowaWon 20–19 at No. 18 Michigan+1No. 18 MichiganLost 14–31 vs. No. 5 Ohio State-17No. 5 Ohio StateWon 41–24 at Washington+17Washington
Each game’s margin, wins above the line and losses below; orange marks an upset win.

Elo: a pregame chance from scores alone.

AP poll, week by week

  1. Wk 1: 22
  2. Wk 2: 21
  3. Wk 3: 18
  4. Wk 4: 17
  5. Wk 5: 14
  6. Wk 6: 20
  7. Wk 7: 17
Record
5–⁠1
Conference
2–⁠1 tied for 5th in Big Ten
AP now
No. 17 in the week 7 poll; peak No. 14
Points
186–⁠87
Coach
Kirk Ferentz
Elo
1668 +37 this season
SP+ rating
13.0 No. 24 of 138; offense No. 50, defense No. 15, special teams No. 4
SRS
12.5 No. 24 of 138 in FBS
Returning
34% of last season’s EPA, No. 83 of 136
Recruiting class
No. 26 roster talent No. 44 in FBS
Offensive coordinator
Tim Lester
Defensive coordinator
Phil Parker
Offense
West Coast
Defense
4–⁠2–⁠5

How good, play by play

  • Offense86th of 138
  • Defense47th of 138
  • Offense, opponent-adjusted77th of 138
  • Defense, opponent-adjusted51st of 138
EPA per playSuccessExplosivenessFBS rank
Offense0.0742%1.2086th of 138
Defense0.0436%1.2247th of 138
Opponent-adjusted0.09 off
0.07 def
42% off
37% def
—77th off
51st def

Passing and running

Pass successDepth of targetDeep throwsLine yardsStuffed
Offense48%7.7 yds13%3.5014%
Defense41%10.9 yds18%2.7018%
How these are measured

Play-weighted averages over games against FBS opponents; raw numbers, not adjusted for the strength of the opponent. EPA (expected points added) measures how much each play changed the expected score; success rate counts plays that kept the offense on schedule; explosiveness is the average EPA on successful plays. Lower is better on defense. Ranked by EPA per play among teams that were FBS that season. The opponent-adjusted row (offense / defense) is CollegeFootballData.com’s WEPA, which accounts for who each team played. Passing and running: depth of target is how far downfield passes traveled in the air; deep throws are the share thrown deep, of the passes whose depth and direction the play-by-play describes (about half); line yards are the running yards per carry credited to the blockers; stuffed is the share of carries stopped at or behind the line. The defense’s line is what its opponents did. From CollegeFootballData.com, 2025 on.

Drives and havoc

Points per trip inside the 40Average startHavoc
Offense3.8own 3111% allowed
Defense3.2own 2417% caused

CORE rating 4.6, 45th of 138 (offense 3.5, defense -1.1).

A trip inside the 40 is a drive that reaches the opponent’s 40-yard line; points per trip is how many it scored on average (allowed, on defense). Average start is where drives began (the defense’s line is where its opponents started). Havoc is the share of plays ending in a tackle for loss, a forced fumble, an interception or a pass broken up. CORE is CollegeFootballData.com’s context- and opponent-adjusted rating (points better than an average team; lower is better on defense). From CollegeFootballData.com.

Leaders

Passing yardsHank Brown QB832 yds
Passing touchdownsHank Brown QB5 TD
Rushing yardsKamari Moulton RB519 yds
Rushing touchdownsKamari Moulton RB4 TD
Receiving yardsTony Diaz WR329 yds
Receiving touchdownsReece Vander Zee WR3 TD
TacklesCam Buffington LB52 tkl
SacksJoseph Anderson DE3 sacks
InterceptionsDeshaun Lee DB2 INT

Top recruits in the 2026 class

Tradon Bessinger QB★★★★No. 156
Darion Jones CB★★★★No. 170
Julian Manson LB★★★★No. 200
Carson Nielsen OT★★★★No. 288
Kasen Thomas LB★★★★No. 290
Hudson Parliament OL★★★★No. 331
Gene Riordan OL★★★★No. 393
Marcello Vitti ATH★★★★No. 458

247Sports composite rankings via CollegeFootballData.com; national rank in the class.

The 2026 class by position

SignedStarsRating
Quarterbacks14.00.937
Receivers53.00.878
Offensive line53.60.896
Defensive line13.00.872
Linebackers33.70.906
Defensive backs23.50.903
Athletes and specialists23.50.856
Whole class193.40.890

High-school signees by position group, with their average stars and 247Sports composite rating (out of 1), via CollegeFootballData.com. Athletes are signees with no set position.

Roster 111

The 2026 roster

111 players, with numbers, heights, hometowns and each player’s 2026 line; 62 have a stat line. See the roster

2026 Big Ten standings

Conference page
TeamConf.OverallAP final
UCLA4–⁠06–⁠0
Ohio State4–⁠06–⁠1
USC3–⁠16–⁠1
Indiana3–⁠16–⁠1
Iowa2–⁠15–⁠1
Northwestern2–⁠15–⁠1
Oregon2–⁠14–⁠2
Minnesota2–⁠14–⁠2
Wisconsin2–⁠14–⁠2
Nebraska2–⁠25–⁠2
Purdue2–⁠23–⁠4
Michigan1–⁠24–⁠2
Illinois1–⁠23–⁠3
Rutgers1–⁠22–⁠4
Washington1–⁠34–⁠3
Penn State0–⁠43–⁠4
Michigan State0–⁠42–⁠5
Maryland0–⁠42–⁠5

Ordered by conference winning percentage, then conference wins. Division splits and tiebreakers aren’t applied.