2025 Tulsa

4–⁠8 (1–⁠7 American Athletic Conference), coached by Tre Lamb.

Schedule and results

Tulsa in 2025, game by game: won vs. Abilene Christian 35–7; lost at New Mexico State 14–21; lost vs. Navy 23–42; won at Oklahoma State 19–12; lost vs. Tulane 14–31; lost at Memphis 7–45; lost at East Carolina 27–41; lost vs. Temple 37–38; lost at Florida Atlantic 21–40; won vs. Oregon State 31–14; won at Army 26–25; lost vs. UAB 24–31+28−38Won 35–7 vs. Abilene Christian+28Abilene Christi…Lost 14–21 at New Mexico State-7New Mexico StateLost 23–42 vs. Navy-19NavyWon 19–12 at Oklahoma State+7Oklahoma StateLost 14–31 vs. Tulane-17TulaneLost 7–45 at Memphis-38MemphisLost 27–41 at East Carolina-14East CarolinaLost 37–38 vs. Temple-1TempleLost 21–40 at Florida Atlantic-19Florida AtlanticWon 31–14 vs. Oregon State+17Oregon StateWon 26–25 at Army+1ArmyLost 24–31 vs. UAB-7UAB
Each game’s margin, wins above the line and losses below.

Elo: a pregame chance from scores alone.

How it ended: Lost to UAB 31–⁠24; unranked in the final AP poll; 13th in the American Athletic Conference.

In program history: The 85th-best season in program history by end-of-season Elo (of 111 on file).

Record
4–⁠8
Conference
1–⁠7 13th in American Athletic Conference
AP final
Unranked
Points
278–⁠347
Coach
Tre Lamb
Elo
1326 −2 this season
SP+ rating
-10.0 No. 104 of 136; offense No. 105, defense No. 107, special teams No. 23
SRS
−11.3 No. 109 of 136 in FBS
Returning
24% of last season’s EPA, No. 89 of 134
Recruiting class
No. 109 roster talent No. 85 in FBS
Offensive coordinators
Brad Robbins and Ty Darlington
Defensive coordinators
Josh Reardon and Mike Gray
Offense
Multiple
Defense
4–⁠2–⁠5

How good, play by play

  • Offense112th of 136
  • Defense72nd of 136
  • Offense, opponent-adjusted120th of 136
  • Defense, opponent-adjusted89th of 136
EPA per playSuccessExplosivenessFBS rank
Offense-0.0140%1.25112th of 136
Defense0.1143%1.2372nd of 136
Opponent-adjusted-0.02 off
0.13 def
39% off
44% def
—120th off
89th def

Passing and running

Pass successDepth of targetDeep throwsLine yardsStuffed
Offense41%12.0 yds26%3.1020%
Defense46%9.4 yds15%3.0017%
How these are measured

Play-weighted averages over games against FBS opponents; raw numbers, not adjusted for the strength of the opponent. EPA (expected points added) measures how much each play changed the expected score; success rate counts plays that kept the offense on schedule; explosiveness is the average EPA on successful plays. Lower is better on defense. Ranked by EPA per play among teams that were FBS that season. The opponent-adjusted row (offense / defense) is CollegeFootballData.com’s WEPA, which accounts for who each team played. Passing and running: depth of target is how far downfield passes traveled in the air; deep throws are the share thrown deep, of the passes whose depth and direction the play-by-play describes (about half); line yards are the running yards per carry credited to the blockers; stuffed is the share of carries stopped at or behind the line. The defense’s line is what its opponents did. From CollegeFootballData.com, 2025 on.

Drives and havoc

Points per trip inside the 40Average startHavoc
Offense3.3own 2717% allowed
Defense3.8own 3413% caused

CORE rating -12.1, 104th of 136 (offense -13.1, defense -1.0).

A trip inside the 40 is a drive that reaches the opponent’s 40-yard line; points per trip is how many it scored on average (allowed, on defense). Average start is where drives began (the defense’s line is where its opponents started). Havoc is the share of plays ending in a tackle for loss, a forced fumble, an interception or a pass broken up. CORE is CollegeFootballData.com’s context- and opponent-adjusted rating (points better than an average team; lower is better on defense). From CollegeFootballData.com.

Leaders

Passing yardsBaylor Hayes QB2,159 yds
Passing touchdownsBaylor Hayes QB12 TD
Rushing yardsDominic Richardson RB1,065 yds
Rushing touchdownsAjay Allen RB5 TD
Receiving yardsBrody Foley TE521 yds
Receiving touchdownsBrody Foley TE7 TD
TacklesRay Coney LB128 tkl
SacksJ’Dan Burnett DL6.5 sacks
InterceptionsElijah Green CB5 INT

Top recruits in the 2025 class

Javion Antai OL★★★No. 1614
Kelvin Washington RB★★★No. 1738
Andrew Alford QB★★★No. 1738
Ian Mayes OL★★★No. 1901
Luke Tevis TE★★★No. 2110

247Sports composite rankings via CollegeFootballData.com; national rank in the class.

The 2025 class by position

SignedStarsRating
Quarterbacks13.00.850
Running backs13.00.850
Receivers43.00.829
Offensive line33.00.847
Defensive line23.00.826
Linebackers23.00.826
Defensive backs23.00.829
Athletes and specialists13.00.816
Whole class163.00.833

High-school signees by position group, with their average stars and 247Sports composite rating (out of 1), via CollegeFootballData.com. Athletes are signees with no set position.

Roster 107

The 2025 roster

107 players, with numbers, heights, hometowns and each player’s 2025 line; 58 have a stat line. See the roster

2025 American Athletic Conference standings

Conference page
TeamConf.OverallAP final
Navy8–⁠111–⁠223
North Texas7–⁠112–⁠224
Tulane7–⁠111–⁠318
South Florida6–⁠29–⁠4
East Carolina6–⁠29–⁠4
Memphis4–⁠48–⁠5
UTSA4–⁠47–⁠6
Army4–⁠57–⁠6
Temple3–⁠55–⁠7
Florida Atlantic3–⁠54–⁠8
Rice2–⁠65–⁠8
UAB2–⁠64–⁠8
Tulsa1–⁠74–⁠8
Charlotte0–⁠81–⁠11

Ordered by conference winning percentage, then conference wins. Division splits and tiebreakers aren’t applied.