2025 Florida Atlantic

4–⁠8 (3–⁠5 American Athletic Conference), coached by Zach Kittley.

Schedule and results

Florida Atlantic in 2025, game by game: lost at Maryland 7–39; won vs. Florida A&M 56–14; lost at Florida International 28–38; lost vs. Memphis 26–55; won at Rice 27–21; won vs. UAB 53–33; lost at No. 19 South Florida 13–48; lost at Navy 32–42; won vs. Tulsa 40–21; lost at Tulane 24–35; lost vs. UConn 45–48; lost vs. East Carolina 3–42+42−39Lost 7–39 at Maryland-32MarylandWon 56–14 vs. Florida A&M+42Florida A&MLost 28–38 at Florida International-10Florida Interna…Lost 26–55 vs. Memphis-29MemphisWon 27–21 at Rice+6RiceWon 53–33 vs. UAB+20UABLost 13–48 at No. 19 South Florida-35No. 19 South FloridaLost 32–42 at Navy-10NavyWon 40–21 vs. Tulsa+19TulsaLost 24–35 at Tulane-11TulaneLost 45–48 vs. UConn-3UConnLost 3–42 vs. East Carolina-39East Carolina
Each game’s margin, wins above the line and losses below.

Elo: a pregame chance from scores alone.

How it ended: Lost to East Carolina 42–⁠3; unranked in the final AP poll; tied for 9th in the American Athletic Conference.

In program history: The 15th-best season in program history by end-of-season Elo (of 25 on file).

Record
4–⁠8
Conference
3–⁠5 tied for 9th in American Athletic Conference
AP final
Unranked
Points
354–⁠436
Coach
Zach Kittley
Elo
1371 −15 this season
SP+ rating
-8.7 No. 98 of 136; offense No. 64, defense No. 131, special teams No. 16
SRS
−11.2 No. 108 of 136 in FBS
Returning
21% of last season’s EPA, No. 96 of 134
Recruiting class
No. 85 roster talent No. 82 in FBS
Defensive coordinator
Brett Dewhurst
Offense
Air raid
Defense
Multiple 4–⁠2–⁠5

How good, play by play

  • Offense105th of 136
  • Defense115th of 136
  • Offense, opponent-adjusted106th of 136
  • Defense, opponent-adjusted111th of 136
EPA per playSuccessExplosivenessFBS rank
Offense0.0139%1.43105th of 136
Defense0.1845%1.26115th of 136
Opponent-adjusted0.02 off
0.17 def
38% off
45% def
—106th off
111th def

Passing and running

Pass successDepth of targetDeep throwsLine yardsStuffed
Offense42%6.9 yds9%2.9017%
Defense43%8.7 yds13%3.3013%
How these are measured

Play-weighted averages over games against FBS opponents; raw numbers, not adjusted for the strength of the opponent. EPA (expected points added) measures how much each play changed the expected score; success rate counts plays that kept the offense on schedule; explosiveness is the average EPA on successful plays. Lower is better on defense. Ranked by EPA per play among teams that were FBS that season. The opponent-adjusted row (offense / defense) is CollegeFootballData.com’s WEPA, which accounts for who each team played. Passing and running: depth of target is how far downfield passes traveled in the air; deep throws are the share thrown deep, of the passes whose depth and direction the play-by-play describes (about half); line yards are the running yards per carry credited to the blockers; stuffed is the share of carries stopped at or behind the line. The defense’s line is what its opponents did. From CollegeFootballData.com, 2025 on.

Drives and havoc

Points per trip inside the 40Average startHavoc
Offense3.5own 3118% allowed
Defense4.6own 3214% caused

CORE rating -14.3, 113th of 136 (offense -3.1, defense 11.2).

A trip inside the 40 is a drive that reaches the opponent’s 40-yard line; points per trip is how many it scored on average (allowed, on defense). Average start is where drives began (the defense’s line is where its opponents started). Havoc is the share of plays ending in a tackle for loss, a forced fumble, an interception or a pass broken up. CORE is CollegeFootballData.com’s context- and opponent-adjusted rating (points better than an average team; lower is better on defense). From CollegeFootballData.com.

Leaders

Passing yardsCaden Veltkamp QB3,652 yds
Passing touchdownsCaden Veltkamp QB24 TD
Rushing yardsGemari Sands RB465 yds
Rushing touchdownsKaden Shields-Dutton RB6 TD
Receiving yardsEaston Messer WR1,029 yds
Receiving touchdownsEaston Messer WR6 TD
TacklesTyler Stolsky LB86 tkl
SacksDeshaun Batiste DB4 sacks
InterceptionsChristopher Keys S1 INT

Top recruits in the 2025 class

Jade Card ATH★★★No. 1024
Cameron Gooden DE★★★No. 1436
Tamez Young TE★★★No. 1458
Branden Hoch WR★★★No. 1728
Zion Paret CB★★★No. 1868

247Sports composite rankings via CollegeFootballData.com; national rank in the class.

The 2025 class by position

SignedStarsRating
Quarterbacks13.00.840
Running backs13.00.841
Receivers43.00.843
Offensive line43.00.842
Defensive line33.00.846
Linebackers23.00.835
Defensive backs23.00.836
Athletes and specialists13.00.868
Whole class183.00.843

High-school signees by position group, with their average stars and 247Sports composite rating (out of 1), via CollegeFootballData.com. Athletes are signees with no set position.

Roster 110

The 2025 roster

110 players, with numbers, heights, hometowns and each player’s 2025 line; 64 have a stat line. See the roster

2025 American Athletic Conference standings

Conference page
TeamConf.OverallAP final
Navy8–⁠111–⁠223
North Texas7–⁠112–⁠224
Tulane7–⁠111–⁠318
South Florida6–⁠29–⁠4
East Carolina6–⁠29–⁠4
Memphis4–⁠48–⁠5
UTSA4–⁠47–⁠6
Army4–⁠57–⁠6
Temple3–⁠55–⁠7
Florida Atlantic3–⁠54–⁠8
Rice2–⁠65–⁠8
UAB2–⁠64–⁠8
Tulsa1–⁠74–⁠8
Charlotte0–⁠81–⁠11

Ordered by conference winning percentage, then conference wins. Division splits and tiebreakers aren’t applied.