2025 Charlotte

1–⁠11 (0–⁠8 American Athletic Conference), coached by Tim Albin.

Schedule and results

Charlotte in 2025, game by game: lost vs. App State 11–34; lost vs. North Carolina 3–20; won vs. Monmouth 42–35; lost vs. Rice 17–28; lost at South Florida 26–54; lost at Army 7–24; lost vs. Temple 14–49; lost vs. North Texas 20–54; lost at East Carolina 22–48; lost vs. UTSA 7–28; lost at No. 4 Georgia 3–35; lost at No. 22 Tulane 0–27+7−35Lost 11–34 vs. App State-23App StateLost 3–20 vs. North Carolina-17North CarolinaWon 42–35 vs. Monmouth+7MonmouthLost 17–28 vs. Rice-11RiceLost 26–54 at South Florida-28South FloridaLost 7–24 at Army-17ArmyLost 14–49 vs. Temple-35TempleLost 20–54 vs. North Texas-34North TexasLost 22–48 at East Carolina-26East CarolinaLost 7–28 vs. UTSA-21UTSALost 3–35 at No. 4 Georgia-32No. 4 GeorgiaLost 0–27 at No. 22 Tulane-27No. 22 Tulane
Each game’s margin, wins above the line and losses below.
DateOpponentResultElo
Aug 29vsApp StateDuke’s Mayo ClassicL 11–⁠3437%
Sep 6vsNorth CarolinaL 3–⁠2047%
Sep 13vsMonmouthW 42–⁠3558%
Sep 18vsRiceL 17–⁠2851%
Oct 3atSouth FloridaL 26–⁠5419%
Oct 11atArmyL 7–⁠2418%
Oct 18vsTempleL 14–⁠4946%
Oct 24vsNorth TexasL 20–⁠5423%
Nov 8atEast CarolinaL 22–⁠4813%
Nov 15vsUTSAL 7–⁠2825%
Nov 22at4GeorgiaL 3–⁠353%
Nov 29at22TulaneL 0–⁠277%

Elo: a pregame chance from scores alone.

How it ended: Lost to Tulane 27–⁠0; unranked in the final AP poll; 14th in the American Athletic Conference.

In program history: The 12th-best season in program history by end-of-season Elo (of 14 on file).

Record
1–⁠11
Conference
0–⁠8 14th in American Athletic Conference
AP final
Unranked
Points
172–⁠436
Coach
Tim Albin
Elo
1252 −152 this season
SP+ rating
-26.7 No. 134 of 136; offense No. 132, defense No. 132, special teams No. 109
SRS
−21.8 No. 134 of 136 in FBS
Returning
24% of last season’s EPA, No. 87 of 134
Recruiting class
No. 144 roster talent No. 108 in FBS
Offensive coordinator
Todd Fitch
Defensive coordinators
Nate Faanes and Kurt Mattix
Offense
Spread option
Defense
4–⁠2–⁠5

How good, play by play

  • Offense133rd of 136
  • Defense95th of 136
  • Offense, opponent-adjusted135th of 136
  • Defense, opponent-adjusted80th of 136
EPA per playSuccessExplosivenessFBS rank
Offense-0.1333%1.19133rd of 136
Defense0.1552%1.0595th of 136
Opponent-adjusted-0.09 off
0.12 def
33% off
50% def
—135th off
80th def

Passing and running

Pass successDepth of targetDeep throwsLine yardsStuffed
Offense38%8.6 yds15%2.5020%
Defense54%6.2 yds5%3.3012%
How these are measured

Play-weighted averages over games against FBS opponents; raw numbers, not adjusted for the strength of the opponent. EPA (expected points added) measures how much each play changed the expected score; success rate counts plays that kept the offense on schedule; explosiveness is the average EPA on successful plays. Lower is better on defense. Ranked by EPA per play among teams that were FBS that season. The opponent-adjusted row (offense / defense) is CollegeFootballData.com’s WEPA, which accounts for who each team played. Passing and running: depth of target is how far downfield passes traveled in the air; deep throws are the share thrown deep, of the passes whose depth and direction the play-by-play describes (about half); line yards are the running yards per carry credited to the blockers; stuffed is the share of carries stopped at or behind the line. The defense’s line is what its opponents did. From CollegeFootballData.com, 2025 on.

Drives and havoc

Points per trip inside the 40Average startHavoc
Offense2.7own 2819% allowed
Defense4.2own 3211% caused

CORE rating -22.7, 131st of 136 (offense -19.6, defense 3.1).

A trip inside the 40 is a drive that reaches the opponent’s 40-yard line; points per trip is how many it scored on average (allowed, on defense). Average start is where drives began (the defense’s line is where its opponents started). Havoc is the share of plays ending in a tackle for loss, a forced fumble, an interception or a pass broken up. CORE is CollegeFootballData.com’s context- and opponent-adjusted rating (points better than an average team; lower is better on defense). From CollegeFootballData.com.

Leaders

Passing yardsGrayson Loftis QB1,415 yds
Passing touchdownsGrayson Loftis QB8 TD
Rushing yardsRod Gainey Jr. RB260 yds
Rushing touchdownsConner Harrell QB2 TD
Receiving yardsJaven Nicholas WR740 yds
Receiving touchdownsJaven Nicholas WR5 TD
TacklesReid Williford LB74 tkl
SacksReid Williford LB4 sacks
InterceptionsJa’Qurious Conley DB3 INT

Top recruits in the 2025 class

Jaylen Doss DL★★★No. 1325
Devon St. Clair S★★★No. 2771
Jeremiah Hoffman WR★★★No. 2926
Dy’Lon Womack ATH
Aiden Bui K

247Sports composite rankings via CollegeFootballData.com; national rank in the class.

The 2025 class by position

SignedStarsRating
Receivers13.00.819
Defensive line13.00.860
Defensive backs13.00.820
Whole class33.00.833

High-school signees by position group, with their average stars and 247Sports composite rating (out of 1), via CollegeFootballData.com. Athletes are signees with no set position.

Roster 109

The 2025 roster

109 players, with numbers, heights, hometowns and each player’s 2025 line; 68 have a stat line. See the roster

Transfers in 34

The 2025 portal

And 22 more, lower-rated or unrated.

Transfers out 44

And 32 more, lower-rated or unrated.

2025 American Athletic Conference standings

Conference page
TeamConf.OverallAP final
Navy8–⁠111–⁠223
North Texas7–⁠112–⁠224
Tulane7–⁠111–⁠318
South Florida6–⁠29–⁠4
East Carolina6–⁠29–⁠4
Memphis4–⁠48–⁠5
UTSA4–⁠47–⁠6
Army4–⁠57–⁠6
Temple3–⁠55–⁠7
Florida Atlantic3–⁠54–⁠8
Rice2–⁠65–⁠8
UAB2–⁠64–⁠8
Tulsa1–⁠74–⁠8
Charlotte0–⁠81–⁠11

Ordered by conference winning percentage, then conference wins. Division splits and tiebreakers aren’t applied.