2025 UTSA

7–⁠6 (4–⁠4 American Athletic Conference), coached by Jeff Traylor.

Schedule and results

UTSA in 2025, game by game: lost at No. 19 Texas A&M 24–42; lost vs. Texas State 36–43; won vs. Incarnate Word 48–20; won at Colorado State 17–16; lost at Temple 21–27; won vs. Rice 61–13; lost at North Texas 17–55; won vs. Tulane 48–26; lost at South Florida 23–55; won at Charlotte 28–7; won vs. East Carolina 58–24; lost vs. Army 24–27; won vs. Florida International 57–20+48−38Lost 24–42 at No. 19 Texas A&M-18No. 19 Texas A&MLost 36–43 vs. Texas State-7Texas StateWon 48–20 vs. Incarnate Word+28Incarnate WordWon 17–16 at Colorado State+1Colorado StateLost 21–27 at Temple-6TempleWon 61–13 vs. Rice+48RiceLost 17–55 at North Texas-38North TexasWon 48–26 vs. Tulane+22TulaneLost 23–55 at South Florida-32South FloridaWon 28–7 at Charlotte+21CharlotteWon 58–24 vs. East Carolina+34East CarolinaLost 24–27 vs. Army-3ArmyWon 57–20 vs. Florida International+37Florida Interna…
Each game’s margin, wins above the line and losses below.
DateOpponentResultElo
Aug 30at19Texas A&ML 24–⁠4241%
Sep 6vsTexas StateL 36–⁠4354%
Sep 13vsIncarnate WordW 48–⁠2070%
Sep 20atColorado StateW 17–⁠1650%
Oct 4atTempleL 21–⁠2762%
Oct 11vsRiceW 61–⁠1371%
Oct 18atNorth TexasL 17–⁠5542%
Oct 30vsTulaneW 48–⁠2639%
Nov 6atSouth FloridaL 23–⁠5534%
Nov 15atCharlotteW 28–⁠775%
Nov 22vsEast CarolinaW 58–⁠2450%
Nov 29vsArmyL 24–⁠2761%
Dec 26vsFlorida InternationalFirst Responder BowlW 57–⁠2061%

Elo: a pregame chance from scores alone.

How it ended: Beat Florida International 57–⁠20 in the First Responder Bowl; unranked in the final AP poll; tied for 6th in the American Athletic Conference.

In program history: The 6th-best season in program history by end-of-season Elo (of 16 on file).

Record
7–⁠6
Conference
4–⁠4 tied for 6th in American Athletic Conference
AP final
Unranked
Points
462–⁠375
Coach
Jeff Traylor
Elo
1576 +23 this season
SP+ rating
3.7 No. 62 of 136; offense No. 27, defense No. 91, special teams No. 59
SRS
1.5 No. 65 of 136 in FBS
Returning
84% of last season’s EPA, No. 3 of 134
Recruiting class
No. 107 roster talent No. 65 in FBS
Offensive coordinator
Justin Burke
Defensive coordinator
Jess Loepp
Offense
Multiple
Defense
3–⁠4

How good, play by play

  • Offense42nd of 136
  • Defense41st of 136
  • Offense, opponent-adjusted48th of 136
  • Defense, opponent-adjusted41st of 136
EPA per playSuccessExplosivenessFBS rank
Offense0.1444%1.3442nd of 136
Defense0.0538%1.3941st of 136
Opponent-adjusted0.12 off
0.04 def
43% off
38% def
—48th off
41st def

Passing and running

Pass successDepth of targetDeep throwsLine yardsStuffed
Offense47%5.9 yds7%2.9018%
Defense41%10.3 yds19%3.0016%
How these are measured

Play-weighted averages over games against FBS opponents; raw numbers, not adjusted for the strength of the opponent. EPA (expected points added) measures how much each play changed the expected score; success rate counts plays that kept the offense on schedule; explosiveness is the average EPA on successful plays. Lower is better on defense. Ranked by EPA per play among teams that were FBS that season. The opponent-adjusted row (offense / defense) is CollegeFootballData.com’s WEPA, which accounts for who each team played. Passing and running: depth of target is how far downfield passes traveled in the air; deep throws are the share thrown deep, of the passes whose depth and direction the play-by-play describes (about half); line yards are the running yards per carry credited to the blockers; stuffed is the share of carries stopped at or behind the line. The defense’s line is what its opponents did. From CollegeFootballData.com, 2025 on.

Drives and havoc

Points per trip inside the 40Average startHavoc
Offense4.2own 3216% allowed
Defense4.2own 2719% caused

CORE rating 4.0, 51st of 136 (offense 3.4, defense -0.6).

A trip inside the 40 is a drive that reaches the opponent’s 40-yard line; points per trip is how many it scored on average (allowed, on defense). Average start is where drives began (the defense’s line is where its opponents started). Havoc is the share of plays ending in a tackle for loss, a forced fumble, an interception or a pass broken up. CORE is CollegeFootballData.com’s context- and opponent-adjusted rating (points better than an average team; lower is better on defense). From CollegeFootballData.com.

Leaders

Passing yardsOwen McCown QB2,990 yds
Passing touchdownsOwen McCown QB30 TD
Rushing yardsRobert Henry RB1,045 yds
Rushing touchdownsRobert Henry RB9 TD
Receiving yardsDevin McCuin WR726 yds
Receiving touchdownsDevin McCuin WR8 TD
TacklesShadrach Banks LB93 tkl
SacksNnanna Anyanwu DE5 sacks
InterceptionsShadrach Banks LB3 INT

Top recruits in the 2025 class

Ty Rupe TE★★★No. 1049
Max Gerlich QB★★★No. 1092
Isaiah Butler-Tanner TE★★★No. 1325
Kingston Jones WR★★★No. 1671
A’marion Breland OT★★★No. 1738

247Sports composite rankings via CollegeFootballData.com; national rank in the class.

The 2025 class by position

SignedStarsRating
Quarterbacks13.00.866
Receivers33.00.860
Offensive line13.00.850
Defensive line23.00.826
Linebackers13.00.830
Defensive backs23.00.825
Whole class103.00.843

High-school signees by position group, with their average stars and 247Sports composite rating (out of 1), via CollegeFootballData.com. Athletes are signees with no set position.

Roster 120

The 2025 roster

120 players, with numbers, heights, hometowns and each player’s 2025 line; 73 have a stat line. See the roster

2025 American Athletic Conference standings

Conference page
TeamConf.OverallAP final
Navy8–⁠111–⁠223
North Texas7–⁠112–⁠224
Tulane7–⁠111–⁠318
South Florida6–⁠29–⁠4
East Carolina6–⁠29–⁠4
Memphis4–⁠48–⁠5
UTSA4–⁠47–⁠6
Army4–⁠57–⁠6
Temple3–⁠55–⁠7
Florida Atlantic3–⁠54–⁠8
Rice2–⁠65–⁠8
UAB2–⁠64–⁠8
Tulsa1–⁠74–⁠8
Charlotte0–⁠81–⁠11

Ordered by conference winning percentage, then conference wins. Division splits and tiebreakers aren’t applied.