2026 Tulsa

4–⁠3 (1–⁠2 American Athletic Conference), coached by Tre Lamb. The season’s Wikipedia article records 3–⁠3, over six games to the seven on file here.

Schedule and results

Tulsa in 2026, game by game: won vs. Oklahoma State 24–10; won at Sam Houston 23–17; won vs. East Texas A&M 42–0; lost at Arkansas 6–34; lost vs. North Texas 44–45; lost at Navy 26–34; won at Rice 38–17+42−28Won 24–10 vs. Oklahoma State+14Oklahoma StateWon 23–17 at Sam Houston+6Sam HoustonWon 42–0 vs. East Texas A&M+42East Texas A&MLost 6–34 at Arkansas-28ArkansasLost 44–45 vs. North Texas-1North TexasLost 26–34 at Navy-8NavyWon 38–17 at Rice+21Rice
Each game’s margin, wins above the line and losses below.
DateOpponentResultElo
Sep 5vsOklahoma StateW 24–⁠1060%
Sep 12atSam HoustonW 23–⁠1747%
Sep 19vsEast Texas A&MW 42–⁠083%
Sep 26atArkansasL 6–⁠3442%
Oct 1vsNorth TexasL 44–⁠4534%
Oct 10atNavyL 26–⁠3426%
Oct 17atRiceW 38–⁠1746%
Oct 23vsArmyPreview36%
Nov 7atTulanePreview23%
Nov 14vsFlorida AtlanticPreview53%
Nov 21vsCharlottePreview74%
Nov 28atUTSAWill be played Nov. 27 or Nov. 28Preview20%

Elo: a pregame chance from scores alone.

Record
4–⁠3
Conference
1–⁠2 tied for 9th in American Athletic Conference
AP now
Unranked
Points
203–⁠157
Coach
Tre Lamb
Elo
1429 +45 this season
SP+ rating
-5.1 No. 93 of 138; offense No. 95, defense No. 88, special teams No. 45
SRS
−2.2 No. 74 of 138 in FBS
Returning
41% of last season’s EPA, No. 64 of 136
Recruiting class
No. 93 roster talent No. 84 in FBS
Offensive coordinators
Kevin Barbay and Ty Darlington
Defensive coordinators
Josh Reardon and Mike Gray
Offense
Spread
Defense
4–⁠2–⁠5

How good, play by play

  • Offense58th of 138
  • Defense57th of 138
  • Offense, opponent-adjusted74th of 138
  • Defense, opponent-adjusted54th of 138
EPA per playSuccessExplosivenessFBS rank
Offense0.1338%1.2458th of 138
Defense0.0742%1.1857th of 138
Opponent-adjusted0.09 off
0.08 def
37% off
41% def
—74th off
54th def

Passing and running

Pass successDepth of targetDeep throwsLine yardsStuffed
Offense41%8.8 yds15%3.2011%
Defense43%7.8 yds11%3.1015%
How these are measured

Play-weighted averages over games against FBS opponents; raw numbers, not adjusted for the strength of the opponent. EPA (expected points added) measures how much each play changed the expected score; success rate counts plays that kept the offense on schedule; explosiveness is the average EPA on successful plays. Lower is better on defense. Ranked by EPA per play among teams that were FBS that season. The opponent-adjusted row (offense / defense) is CollegeFootballData.com’s WEPA, which accounts for who each team played. Passing and running: depth of target is how far downfield passes traveled in the air; deep throws are the share thrown deep, of the passes whose depth and direction the play-by-play describes (about half); line yards are the running yards per carry credited to the blockers; stuffed is the share of carries stopped at or behind the line. The defense’s line is what its opponents did. From CollegeFootballData.com, 2025 on.

Drives and havoc

Points per trip inside the 40Average startHavoc
Offense4.0own 3015% allowed
Defense2.8own 2613% caused

CORE rating -3.4, 79th of 138 (offense -4.6, defense -1.3).

A trip inside the 40 is a drive that reaches the opponent’s 40-yard line; points per trip is how many it scored on average (allowed, on defense). Average start is where drives began (the defense’s line is where its opponents started). Havoc is the share of plays ending in a tackle for loss, a forced fumble, an interception or a pass broken up. CORE is CollegeFootballData.com’s context- and opponent-adjusted rating (points better than an average team; lower is better on defense). From CollegeFootballData.com.

Leaders

Passing yardsBaylor Hayes QB1,081 yds
Passing touchdownsBaylor Hayes QB8 TD
Rushing yardsDamari Alston RB366 yds
Rushing touchdownsDamari Alston RB6 TD
Receiving yardsOran Singleton Jr. WR474 yds
Receiving touchdownsOran Singleton Jr. WR4 TD
TacklesChris Thompson Jr. LB66 tkl
SacksKyran Duhon DL6 sacks
InterceptionsTyson Williams S2 INT

Top recruits in the 2026 class

Jamarcea Plater RB★★★No. 554
Xavier Green WR★★★No. 1211
Keynan Farley CB★★★No. 1358
Carter Langenderfer S★★★No. 1523
Reilarean Phillips LB★★★No. 1523

247Sports composite rankings via CollegeFootballData.com; national rank in the class.

The 2026 class by position

SignedStarsRating
Quarterbacks13.00.853
Running backs13.00.887
Receivers33.00.853
Offensive line43.00.847
Defensive line23.00.851
Linebackers23.00.851
Defensive backs33.00.859
Athletes and specialists13.00.816
Whole class173.00.852

High-school signees by position group, with their average stars and 247Sports composite rating (out of 1), via CollegeFootballData.com. Athletes are signees with no set position.

Roster 111

The 2026 roster

111 players, with numbers, heights, hometowns and each player’s 2026 line; 61 have a stat line. See the roster

Transfers in 21

The 2026 portal

And 9 more, lower-rated or unrated.

Transfers out 22

Brody Foley TE★★★★to Louisville
Ray Coney LB★★★to Texas A&M
J’Dan Burnett DE★★★to Rutgers
Joe Hjelle DL★★★to Indiana
Zion Booker WR★★★to Kennesaw State
Zion Steptoe WR★★★to Minnesota
Decari Prater S★★★no new school on file
Kirk Francis QB★★★to Texas Tech
Josh Anglin LB★★★to Kennesaw State
Ajay Allen RB★★★★no new school on file
Alex Green WR★★★to UTRGV
Buddha Garrett S★★★no new school on file

And 10 more, lower-rated or unrated.

2026 American Athletic Conference standings

Conference page
TeamConf.OverallAP final
UTSA3–⁠06–⁠1
North Texas2–⁠04–⁠2
Army3–⁠14–⁠2
Memphis2–⁠15–⁠2
UAB2–⁠14–⁠3
Florida Atlantic1–⁠14–⁠2
East Carolina1–⁠13–⁠3
Tulane1–⁠13–⁠3
South Florida1–⁠25–⁠2
Tulsa1–⁠24–⁠3
Temple1–⁠22–⁠5
Charlotte1–⁠21–⁠6
Navy1–⁠32–⁠4
Rice0–⁠31–⁠6

Ordered by conference winning percentage, then conference wins. Division splits and tiebreakers aren’t applied.