2026 Rice

1–⁠6 (0–⁠3 American Athletic Conference), coached by Scott Abell. The season’s Wikipedia article records 1–⁠5, over six games to the seven on file here.

Schedule and results

Rice in 2026, game by game: won vs. Houston Christian 31–3; lost at No. 3 Notre Dame 0–52; lost vs. Western Michigan 21–28; lost at Fresno State 24–38; lost vs. UTSA 14–16; lost at East Carolina 12–28; lost vs. Tulsa 17–38+28−52Won 31–3 vs. Houston Christian+28Houston Christi…Lost 0–52 at No. 3 Notre Dame-52No. 3 Notre DameLost 21–28 vs. Western Michigan-7Western MichiganLost 24–38 at Fresno State-14Fresno StateLost 14–16 vs. UTSA-2UTSALost 12–28 at East Carolina-16East CarolinaLost 17–38 vs. Tulsa-21Tulsa
Each game’s margin, wins above the line and losses below.

Elo: a pregame chance from scores alone.

Record
1–⁠6
Conference
0–⁠3 14th in American Athletic Conference
AP now
Unranked
Points
119–⁠203
Coach
Scott Abell
Elo
1335 −73 this season
SP+ rating
-13.4 No. 120 of 138; offense No. 122, defense No. 99, special teams No. 88
SRS
−9.3 No. 105 of 138 in FBS
Returning
39% of last season’s EPA, No. 69 of 136
Recruiting class
No. 104 roster talent No. 100 in FBS
Offensive coordinator
Vince Munch
Defensive coordinator
Jon Kay

How good, play by play

  • Offense124th of 138
  • Defense100th of 138
  • Offense, opponent-adjusted121st of 138
  • Defense, opponent-adjusted75th of 138
EPA per playSuccessExplosivenessFBS rank
Offense-0.0637%1.21124th of 138
Defense0.1842%1.36100th of 138
Opponent-adjusted0.02 off
0.11 def
38% off
41% def
—121st off
75th def

Passing and running

Pass successDepth of targetDeep throwsLine yardsStuffed
Offense33%10.6 yds20%3.1017%
Defense42%8.6 yds18%3.0017%
How these are measured

Play-weighted averages over games against FBS opponents; raw numbers, not adjusted for the strength of the opponent. EPA (expected points added) measures how much each play changed the expected score; success rate counts plays that kept the offense on schedule; explosiveness is the average EPA on successful plays. Lower is better on defense. Ranked by EPA per play among teams that were FBS that season. The opponent-adjusted row (offense / defense) is CollegeFootballData.com’s WEPA, which accounts for who each team played. Passing and running: depth of target is how far downfield passes traveled in the air; deep throws are the share thrown deep, of the passes whose depth and direction the play-by-play describes (about half); line yards are the running yards per carry credited to the blockers; stuffed is the share of carries stopped at or behind the line. The defense’s line is what its opponents did. From CollegeFootballData.com, 2025 on.

Drives and havoc

Points per trip inside the 40Average startHavoc
Offense3.2own 2416% allowed
Defense3.8own 3316% caused

CORE rating -11.9, 112th of 138 (offense -11.3, defense 0.7).

A trip inside the 40 is a drive that reaches the opponent’s 40-yard line; points per trip is how many it scored on average (allowed, on defense). Average start is where drives began (the defense’s line is where its opponents started). Havoc is the share of plays ending in a tackle for loss, a forced fumble, an interception or a pass broken up. CORE is CollegeFootballData.com’s context- and opponent-adjusted rating (points better than an average team; lower is better on defense). From CollegeFootballData.com.

Leaders

Passing yardsJacurri Brown QB471 yds
Passing touchdownsJacurri Brown QB2 TD
Rushing yardsJacurri Brown QB668 yds
Rushing touchdownsJacurri Brown QB6 TD
Receiving yardsJordan Clark WR223 yds
Receiving touchdownsBarry Jackson Jr. WR1 TD
TacklesA.J. Brown DE52 tkl
SacksChibby Nwajuaku DL2 sacks
InterceptionsDaveon Hook S1 INT

Top recruits in the 2026 class

Marcus Page Jr. OL★★★No. 1336
Ayden Wilhelm QB★★★No. 1438
Chris Knauls DL★★★No. 1523
Seth Clarke DE★★★No. 1654
Jayden Cupitt LB★★★No. 1754

247Sports composite rankings via CollegeFootballData.com; national rank in the class.

The 2026 class by position

SignedStarsRating
Quarterbacks13.00.863
Running backs33.00.845
Receivers43.00.835
Offensive line33.00.855
Defensive line63.00.841
Linebackers13.00.857
Defensive backs33.00.835
Athletes and specialists13.00.821
Whole class223.00.842

High-school signees by position group, with their average stars and 247Sports composite rating (out of 1), via CollegeFootballData.com. Athletes are signees with no set position.

Roster 103

The 2026 roster

103 players, with numbers, heights, hometowns and each player’s 2026 line; 55 have a stat line. See the roster

Transfers in 20

The 2026 portal

And 8 more, lower-rated or unrated.

Transfers out 22

And 10 more, lower-rated or unrated.

2026 American Athletic Conference standings

Conference page
TeamConf.OverallAP final
UTSA3–⁠06–⁠1
North Texas2–⁠04–⁠2
Army3–⁠14–⁠2
Memphis2–⁠15–⁠2
UAB2–⁠14–⁠3
Florida Atlantic1–⁠14–⁠2
East Carolina1–⁠13–⁠3
Tulane1–⁠13–⁠3
South Florida1–⁠25–⁠2
Tulsa1–⁠24–⁠3
Temple1–⁠22–⁠5
Charlotte1–⁠21–⁠6
Navy1–⁠32–⁠4
Rice0–⁠31–⁠6

Ordered by conference winning percentage, then conference wins. Division splits and tiebreakers aren’t applied.