2025 Houston

10–⁠3 (6–⁠3 Big 12), coached by Willie Fritz, finished No. 22 in the AP poll.

Schedule and results

Houston in 2025, game by game: won vs. Stephen F. Austin 27–0; won at Rice 35–9; won vs. Colorado 36–20; won at Oregon State 27–24; lost vs. No. 11 Texas Tech 11–35; won at Oklahoma State 39–17; won vs. Arizona 31–28; won at No. 24 Arizona State 24–16; lost vs. West Virginia 35–45; won at UCF 30–27; lost vs. TCU 14–17; won at Baylor 31–24; won vs. LSU 38–35+27−24Won 27–0 vs. Stephen F. Austin+27Stephen F. Aust…Won 35–9 at Rice+26RiceWon 36–20 vs. Colorado+16ColoradoWon 27–24 at Oregon State+3Oregon StateLost 11–35 vs. No. 11 Texas Tech-24No. 11 Texas TechWon 39–17 at Oklahoma State+22Oklahoma StateWon 31–28 vs. Arizona+3ArizonaWon 24–16 at No. 24 Arizona State+8No. 24 Arizona StateLost 35–45 vs. West Virginia-10West VirginiaWon 30–27 at UCF+3UCFLost 14–17 vs. TCU-3TCUWon 31–24 at Baylor+7BaylorWon 38–35 vs. LSU+3LSU
Each game’s margin, wins above the line and losses below; orange marks an upset win.
DateOpponentResultElo
Aug 28vsStephen F. AustinW 27–⁠072%
Sep 6atRiceW 35–⁠944%
Sep 12vsColoradoW 36–⁠2051%
Sep 26atOregon StateW 27–⁠2460%
Oct 4vs11Texas TechL 11–⁠3548%
Oct 11atOklahoma StateW 39–⁠1759%
Oct 18vsArizonaW 31–⁠2860%
Oct 25at24Arizona StateW 24–⁠1631%
Nov 1vsWest VirginiaL 35–⁠4577%
Nov 7atUCFW 30–⁠2751%
Nov 22vsTCUL 14–⁠1750%
Nov 29atBaylorW 31–⁠2446%
Dec 27vsLSUTexas BowlW 38–⁠3543%

Elo: a pregame chance from scores alone.

How it ended: Beat LSU 38–⁠35 in the Texas Bowl; No. 22 in the final AP poll; tied for 5th in the Big 12.

In program history: The 33rd-best season in program history by end-of-season Elo (of 81 on file).

AP poll, week by week

  1. Wk 10: 22
  2. Wk 13: 25
  3. Final: 22
Record
10–⁠3
Conference
6–⁠3 tied for 5th in Big 12
AP final
No. 22 peak No. 22
Points
378–⁠297
Coach
Willie Fritz
Elo
1570 +128 this season
SP+ rating
7.4 No. 40 of 136; offense No. 44, defense No. 46, special teams No. 99
SRS
6.3 No. 40 of 136 in FBS
Returning
68% of last season’s EPA, No. 11 of 134
Recruiting class
No. 52 roster talent No. 66 in FBS
Offensive coordinator
Slade Nagle
Defensive coordinator
Austin Armstrong
Offense
Spread
Defense
3–⁠3–⁠5

How good, play by play

  • Offense79th of 136
  • Defense56th of 136
  • Offense, opponent-adjusted62nd of 136
  • Defense, opponent-adjusted72nd of 136
EPA per playSuccessExplosivenessFBS rank
Offense0.0742%1.2279th of 136
Defense0.0743%1.1756th of 136
Opponent-adjusted0.10 off
0.11 def
44% off
44% def
—62nd off
72nd def

Passing and running

Pass successDepth of targetDeep throwsLine yardsStuffed
Offense46%7.8 yds10%2.9016%
Defense40%9.4 yds12%3.0016%
How these are measured

Play-weighted averages over games against FBS opponents; raw numbers, not adjusted for the strength of the opponent. EPA (expected points added) measures how much each play changed the expected score; success rate counts plays that kept the offense on schedule; explosiveness is the average EPA on successful plays. Lower is better on defense. Ranked by EPA per play among teams that were FBS that season. The opponent-adjusted row (offense / defense) is CollegeFootballData.com’s WEPA, which accounts for who each team played. Passing and running: depth of target is how far downfield passes traveled in the air; deep throws are the share thrown deep, of the passes whose depth and direction the play-by-play describes (about half); line yards are the running yards per carry credited to the blockers; stuffed is the share of carries stopped at or behind the line. The defense’s line is what its opponents did. From CollegeFootballData.com, 2025 on.

Drives and havoc

Points per trip inside the 40Average startHavoc
Offense3.5own 3113% allowed
Defense3.9own 3016% caused

CORE rating -0.2, 65th of 136 (offense 0.4, defense 0.6).

A trip inside the 40 is a drive that reaches the opponent’s 40-yard line; points per trip is how many it scored on average (allowed, on defense). Average start is where drives began (the defense’s line is where its opponents started). Havoc is the share of plays ending in a tackle for loss, a forced fumble, an interception or a pass broken up. CORE is CollegeFootballData.com’s context- and opponent-adjusted rating (points better than an average team; lower is better on defense). From CollegeFootballData.com.

Leaders

Passing yardsConner Weigman QB2,705 yds
Passing touchdownsConner Weigman QB25 TD
Rushing yardsDean Connors RB977 yds
Rushing touchdownsConner Weigman QB11 TD
Receiving yardsAmare Thomas WR966 yds
Receiving touchdownsAmare Thomas WR12 TD
TacklesJalen Garner LB76 tkl
SacksEddie Walls III DL7 sacks
InterceptionsWill James DB3 INT

Top recruits in the 2025 class

Demetris Dean II OT★★★★No. 402
Travis Buhake DL★★★★No. 437
Sheldon Rice DE★★★No. 588
Reshad Sterling DE★★★No. 606
Kenzy West ATH★★★No. 686

247Sports composite rankings via CollegeFootballData.com; national rank in the class.

The 2025 class by position

SignedStarsRating
Quarterbacks13.00.875
Receivers43.00.862
Offensive line43.30.862
Defensive line63.20.877
Linebackers23.00.851
Athletes and specialists23.00.878
Whole class193.10.868

High-school signees by position group, with their average stars and 247Sports composite rating (out of 1), via CollegeFootballData.com. Athletes are signees with no set position.

Drafted in 2026

The 2026 draft
Rd 5Tanner Koziol TEJacksonville Jaguars

Roster 111

The 2025 roster

111 players, with numbers, heights, hometowns and each player’s 2025 line; 53 have a stat line. See the roster

Transfers in 28

The 2025 portal

And 16 more, lower-rated or unrated.

Transfers out 28

And 16 more, lower-rated or unrated.

All-Big 12

2 first team, 5 second team

First team

Second team

From Wikipedia’s 2025 all-conference team article, with the selectors that named each player (AP-1: the Associated Press’s first team).

2025 Big 12 standings

Conference page
TeamConf.OverallAP final
Texas Tech8–⁠112–⁠27
BYU8–⁠112–⁠211
Utah7–⁠211–⁠214
Arizona7–⁠39–⁠4
Houston6–⁠310–⁠322
Arizona State6–⁠38–⁠5
TCU5–⁠49–⁠425
Iowa State5–⁠48–⁠4
Cincinnati5–⁠47–⁠6
Kansas State5–⁠56–⁠6
Baylor3–⁠65–⁠7
Kansas3–⁠65–⁠7
UCF2–⁠75–⁠7
West Virginia2–⁠74–⁠8
Colorado1–⁠83–⁠9
Oklahoma State0–⁠91–⁠11

Ordered by conference winning percentage, then conference wins. Division splits and tiebreakers aren’t applied.