
2025 TCU
9–4 (5–4 Big 12), coached by Sonny Dykes, finished No. 25 in the AP poll. Share
Schedule and results
- Biggest upsetBeat No. 16 USC 30–27Dec 30
USC was ranked No. 16 and favored to win.
| Date | Opponent | Result | Elo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1 | at | W 48–14 | 56% |
| Sep 13 | vs | W 42–21 | 87% |
| Sep 20 | vs | W 35–24 | 58% |
| Sep 26 | at | L 24–27 | 44% |
| Oct 4 | vs | W 35–21 | 72% |
| Oct 11 | at | L 28–41 | 54% |
| Oct 18 | vs | W 42–36 | 65% |
| Oct 25 | at | W 23–17 | 70% |
| Nov 8 | vs | L 17–20 | 68% |
| Nov 15 | at | L 13–44 | 33% |
| Nov 22 | at | W 17–14 | 50% |
| Nov 29 | vs | W 45–23 | 68% |
| Dec 30Bowls & playoff | vs | W 30–27 | 44% |
Elo: a pregame chance from scores alone.
How it ended: Beat USC 30–27 in the Alamo Bowl; No. 25 in the final AP poll; tied for 7th in the Big 12.
In program history: The 24th-best season in program history by end-of-season Elo (of 123 on file).
AP poll, week by week
- Wk 5: 24
- Final: 25
- Record
- 9–4
- Conference
- 5–4 tied for 7th in Big 12
- AP final
- No. 25 peak No. 24
- Points
- 399–329
- Coach
- Sonny Dykes
- Elo
- 1649 +62 this season
- SP+ rating
- 8.3 No. 37 of 136; offense No. 30, defense No. 50, special teams No. 84
- SRS
- 8.5 No. 33 of 136 in FBS
- Returning
- 57% of last season’s EPA, No. 30 of 134
- Recruiting class
- No. 24 roster talent No. 32 in FBS
- Offensive coordinators
- Kendal Briles and A.J. Ricker
- Defensive coordinator
- Andy Avalos
- Offense
- Bear raid
- Defense
- 4–2–5
How good, play by play
| EPA per play | Success | Explosiveness | FBS rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offense | 0.13 | 44% | 1.27 | 48th of 136 |
| Defense | 0.05 | 39% | 1.31 | 42nd of 136 |
| Opponent-adjusted | 0.14 off 0.03 def | 44% off 38% def | — | 43rd off 37th def |
Passing and running
| Pass success | Depth of target | Deep throws | Line yards | Stuffed | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Offense | 48% | 7.7 yds | 10% | 2.90 | 19% |
| Defense | 45% | 9.2 yds | 14% | 2.80 | 16% |
How these are measured
Play-weighted averages over games against FBS opponents; raw numbers, not adjusted for the strength of the opponent. EPA (expected points added) measures how much each play changed the expected score; success rate counts plays that kept the offense on schedule; explosiveness is the average EPA on successful plays. Lower is better on defense. Ranked by EPA per play among teams that were FBS that season. The opponent-adjusted row (offense / defense) is CollegeFootballData.com’s WEPA, which accounts for who each team played. Passing and running: depth of target is how far downfield passes traveled in the air; deep throws are the share thrown deep, of the passes whose depth and direction the play-by-play describes (about half); line yards are the running yards per carry credited to the blockers; stuffed is the share of carries stopped at or behind the line. The defense’s line is what its opponents did. From CollegeFootballData.com, 2025 on.
Drives and havoc
| Points per trip inside the 40 | Average start | Havoc | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Offense | 4.1 | own 30 | 15% allowed |
| Defense | 3.5 | own 29 | 15% caused |
CORE rating 10.4, 37th of 136 (offense 6.0, defense -4.4).
A trip inside the 40 is a drive that reaches the opponent’s 40-yard line; points per trip is how many it scored on average (allowed, on defense). Average start is where drives began (the defense’s line is where its opponents started). Havoc is the share of plays ending in a tackle for loss, a forced fumble, an interception or a pass broken up. CORE is CollegeFootballData.com’s context- and opponent-adjusted rating (points better than an average team; lower is better on defense). From CollegeFootballData.com.
Leaders
| Passing yards | Josh Hoover QB | 3,472 yds |
| Passing touchdowns | Josh Hoover QB | 29 TD |
| Rushing yards | Jeremy Payne RB | 623 yds |
| Rushing touchdowns | Trent Battle RB | 6 TD |
| Receiving yards | Eric McAlister WR | 1,190 yds |
| Receiving touchdowns | Eric McAlister WR | 10 TD |
| Tackles | Kaleb Elarms-Orr LB | 130 tkl |
| Sacks | Kaleb Elarms-Orr LB | 4 sacks |
| Interceptions | Jamel Johnson S | 5 INT |
Top recruits in the 2025 class
| Chad Woodfork DE | ★★★★ | No. 101 |
| Adam Schobel QB | ★★★★ | No. 212 |
| Terry Shelton WR | ★★★★ | No. 224 |
| Micah Strickland CB | ★★★★ | No. 310 |
| Kilian Registe OT | ★★★★ | No. 461 |
| Ed Small WR | ★★★★ | No. 463 |
247Sports composite rankings via CollegeFootballData.com; national rank in the class.
The 2025 class by position
| Signed | Stars | Rating | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quarterbacks | 1 | 4.0 | 0.921 |
| Running backs | 1 | 3.0 | 0.863 |
| Receivers | 5 | 3.4 | 0.881 |
| Offensive line | 4 | 3.3 | 0.877 |
| Defensive line | 6 | 3.2 | 0.880 |
| Linebackers | 4 | 3.0 | 0.870 |
| Defensive backs | 5 | 3.2 | 0.875 |
| Athletes and specialists | 1 | 3.0 | 0.859 |
| Whole class | 27 | 3.2 | 0.877 |
High-school signees by position group, with their average stars and 247Sports composite rating (out of 1), via CollegeFootballData.com. Athletes are signees with no set position.
Drafted in 2026
The 2026 draft| Rd 2 | Bud Clark S | Seattle Seahawks |
| Rd 4 | Kaleb Elarms-Orr LB | Buffalo Bills |
| Rd 6 | Namdi Obiazor LB | New England Patriots |
Roster 117
The 2025 roster117 players, with numbers, heights, hometowns and each player’s 2025 line; 62 have a stat line. See the roster
Transfers in 11
The 2025 portal| ★★★★ | from | |
| ★★★ | from | |
| ★★★ | from | |
| ★★★ | from | |
| ★★★ | from | |
| ★★★ | from | |
| ★★★ | from | |
| ★★★ | from | |
| ★★★ | from | |
| ★★★ | from | |
| ★★★ | from |
Transfers out 19
And 7 more, lower-rated or unrated.
All-Big 12
2 first team, 3 second teamFirst team
Eric McAlisterWRCoaches-1; Media-1
Kaleb Elarms-OrrLBCoaches-1; Media-1
Second team
Devean DealDLCoaches-2
Bud ClarkDBCoaches-2; Media-2
Jamel JohnsonDBCoaches-2; Media-2
From Wikipedia’s 2025 all-conference team article, with the selectors that named each player (AP-1: the Associated Press’s first team).
2025 Big 12 standings
Conference page| Team | Conf. | Overall | AP final |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8–1 | 12–2 | 7 | |
| 8–1 | 12–2 | 11 | |
| 7–2 | 11–2 | 14 | |
| 7–3 | 9–4 | ||
| 6–3 | 10–3 | 22 | |
| 6–3 | 8–5 | ||
| 5–4 | 9–4 | 25 | |
| 5–4 | 8–4 | ||
| 5–4 | 7–6 | ||
| 5–5 | 6–6 | ||
| 3–6 | 5–7 | ||
| 3–6 | 5–7 | ||
| 2–7 | 5–7 | ||
| 2–7 | 4–8 | ||
| 1–8 | 3–9 | ||
| 0–9 | 1–11 |
Ordered by conference winning percentage, then conference wins. Division splits and tiebreakers aren’t applied.