Syracuse at Brown

Saturday, October 14, 1922

Syracuse and Brown tied 0–⁠0. It was their 10th meeting; after it, Syracuse led the series 6–⁠2–⁠2.

AwaySyracuse6–⁠1–⁠2 in 1922
0
HomeBrown6–⁠2–⁠1 in 1922
0

FinalHigh 63°F, low 44°F

In the newspapers

  • The New-York tribune's story: Syracuse Still, Contender i'm Spite of Tie Overconfidence of Orange Played Big Part i'm score less Battle With Brown

    New-York tribune, New York, October 16, 1922, page 11

    Read the text

    Syracuse Still, Contender i’m Spite of Tie Overconfidence of Orange Played Big Part i’m score less Battle With Brown After seeing the Syracuse eleven play scoreless tie against Brown on saturday we still contend the Orange IS championship possibility. But beiore Justifying such prophecy the upstate eleven will have to shake itself loose from it’s lethargic condition. Had the New Workers been aroused ON Saturday there is little doubt they would have beaten the Providence stu dents decisively. syracuse went into that game a Bit oyerconfident, listless and in state OF mind not calculated to bring it sue cess Coach Meehan foresaw the symptoms as early as Friday night. when he cautioned his men against underrating Brown. The game began with Brown aroused to fighting pitch. In this instance the Brunonlnas psychologically had the advantage. They were picked to be on that field to hold the Orange in check and consequently they were ever alert, always on their toes and constantly carrying forward. Not SO with the upstate eleven, which began the contest in q rather leisurely manner. In no time Meehan had made several substitutions and had sent in instructions to get busy. Care lessness led to several costly mistakes and before the Syracuse students could pull themselves together the first half had ended. The Orange was different team in the second half. But so was Brown. Having held the highly touted speed sters from New York from crossing its goal line the local team became imbucd with confidence and courage It put up defense in the second half that was as good as any we have ever seen and which effectively resisted all eff forts Of the Salt City students to push over a score. Even SO, Syracuse might we’ll have won the game but for bungling on the part of the officials. In the latter part Of the game, just after Syracuse had lost the ball on down, Mort starobin, OF the visitors, with mighty effort broke through, smashed down a pass, scooped’ up the ball and ran for o touchdown. The umpire’s whistle blew and the play was revoked. The umpire said it was an incompleted forward pass. Captain Culver protested, but to no avail After the game Coach Meehan accosted the four officials together. “That decision cost US the game” he said, “and would like an explanation. Ger tainly that was a lateral pass as much as those two previous passes of Brown S were lateral” Referee Reed, who had gone down the field with Starobin, said the umpire called the ball back. Bur leigh, the umpire, said he did so because McGrath, the linesman, had heeled the ground as if to show where the bail was grounded. McGrath declared he knew nothing about the play And so the matter ended. Syracuse will play Pittsburgh next Saturday and unless we are nightly mistaken it will be different kind OF a team from the one which Brown tied This contest ought to be knockout Undoubtedly old Pop Warner is thor oughly aroused now. Two defeats in succession is something entirely new for him. | We met a scout last night who had seen the Pitt-West Virginia game. “a draw would have been good decision for that game” he said pittsburgh, on fine, strong, rushing tactics, marched straight down the field for it’s touch down. West Virginia blocked kick. Later West Virginia kicked goal So went the game. But I’m telling you Pitt has great team, make no mistake about that”

  • The Albuquerque morning journal's story: FOOTBALL RESULTS

    Albuquerque morning journal, Albuquerque, N.M., October 15, 1922, page 4 (results column)

    Read the text

    FOOTBALL RESULTS Iowa, g. Yale, 0. Notre Dame, 20; Purdue, 0. Yale Freshmen, o.: Exeter, q. Detroit, 0; Des Moines, s. Pennsylvania, IL; Maryland 0. Brown, 0; Syracuse. 0. Vanderbilt, o.. Michigan, 0. Minnesota, 20; Indiana, 0. Army. 10; Alabama, 6. Harvard, Is; Bowdoin, 0. Cincinnati, 0; Georgetown, 81. University of Utah, 40: Brigham Young University, 0. Ohio University, Z; Denison, 0. Oklahoma University, 10 Central State Teachers College, 0. Texas University, 10; Oklahoma Aggies, Z. Texas Christian University, q; Simmons college, Z. Denver University, 8; Nebraska Wesleyan, O. Trinidad High School. IA; Canon City Tigers, z. Centre, 10: V. p. l., 6. Drake, G; Kansas, 0. Chicago, 10: Northwestern, Z. Missouri, 6; Ames, 8. LVs SOiEetNNI Ns Wabash, %; Michigan Aggies, O.. Navy. IA: Bucknell Z. Oberlin, O.; Ohio State, IA. Dartmouth, 21: Middlebury, 0. Amherst. 10; Union, 0. Washington-Jefferson, Z; Carnegle, 7. Creighton, 21; Iowa Wesleyan, Z. Georgia, 7; Furnam, O. Washington and Lee. 10; Carson Newman, 7. Georgia Tech, SO; Alabama State, Z, Grinnell, rs; st. Louis, 0. Colorado Aggies, 60; Wyoming o.. Colorado University 8; New Mexico, 0. Kansas Aggies, %; Washington, IA. Tulane, 80: Spring Hill. 10. Southern Methodist University, 81; Louisiana State, 0. Hobart, 20; New York UNIVERSE ty. O.. Cornell, sS; New Hampshire State, Z. Rutgers. IS; Lehigh, 6, Mount Union. Is; Heidelberg, O.. Penn State, so; Lebanon VAL ley, s. Johns Hopkins, 10; George Wash ington, 6. Catholic University, Z; Washing ton College, 8. Illinois Wesleyan, 8; Augusta, o.. Suwanee, 10; Oglethorpe, o. Colorado College, So; Gunnison State Normal, 0. University of Southern Califormia, Is; University of Arizona, 0. Santa Clara, 0; Stanford, z. st. Mary’s College, 0; University of California, Al. Washington, Q; Idaho, 0. Washington State College, 10; Gonzaga, z. California, Al; st. Mary’s, O..

Public-domain newspapers from the Library of Congress’s Chronicling America, found through the American Stories dataset (Dell and Harvard, CC BY 4.0). The text is the machine reading of the page, mistakes and all.

Before kickoff

Our ratings going in

Our ratings (scores only)

Syracuse 55% to win.

Syracuse leads 9–⁠3–⁠3 in 15 meetings, counting the five since this game.

Recent meetings
1935Syracuse 19, Brown 0
1934Syracuse 33, Brown 0
1933Brown 10, Syracuse 7
1930Brown 16, Syracuse 16
1929Syracuse 6, Brown 0
1922Syracuse 0, Brown 0

Around this game

Syracuse

Brown