2025 South Carolina

4–⁠8 (1–⁠7 Southeastern Conference), coached by Shane Beamer.

Schedule and results

South Carolina in 2025, game by game: won vs. Virginia Tech 24–11; won vs. South Carolina State 38–10; lost vs. Vanderbilt 7–31; lost at No. 23 Missouri 20–29; won vs. Kentucky 35–13; lost at No. 11 LSU 10–20; lost vs. No. 14 Oklahoma 7–26; lost vs. No. 4 Alabama 22–29; lost at No. 7 Ole Miss 14–30; lost at No. 3 Texas A&M 30–31; won vs. Coastal Carolina 51–7; lost vs. Clemson 14–28+44−24Won 24–11 vs. Virginia Tech+13Virginia TechWon 38–10 vs. South Carolina State+28South Carolina …Lost 7–31 vs. Vanderbilt-24VanderbiltLost 20–29 at No. 23 Missouri-9No. 23 MissouriWon 35–13 vs. Kentucky+22KentuckyLost 10–20 at No. 11 LSU-10No. 11 LSULost 7–26 vs. No. 14 Oklahoma-19No. 14 OklahomaLost 22–29 vs. No. 4 Alabama-7No. 4 AlabamaLost 14–30 at No. 7 Ole Miss-16No. 7 Ole MissLost 30–31 at No. 3 Texas A&M-1No. 3 Texas A&MWon 51–7 vs. Coastal Carolina+44Coastal CarolinaLost 14–28 vs. Clemson-14Clemson
Each game’s margin, wins above the line and losses below.

Elo: a pregame chance from scores alone.

How it ended: Lost to Clemson 28–⁠14; unranked in the final AP poll; tied for 13th in the Southeastern Conference.

In program history: The 39th-best season in program history by end-of-season Elo (of 123 on file).

AP poll, week by week

  1. Wk 1: 13
  2. Wk 2: 10
  3. Wk 3: 11
Record
4–⁠8
Conference
1–⁠7 tied for 13th in Southeastern Conference
AP final
Unranked peak No. 10
Points
272–⁠265
Coach
Shane Beamer
Elo
1523 −83 this season
SP+ rating
5.9 No. 49 of 136; offense No. 86, defense No. 31, special teams No. 16
SRS
3.8 No. 53 of 136 in FBS
Returning
63% of last season’s EPA, No. 22 of 134
Recruiting class
No. 18 roster talent No. 18 in FBS
Offensive coordinator
Mike Shula
Defensive coordinator
Clayton White
Offense
Power spread
Defense
4–⁠2–⁠5

How good, play by play

  • Offense107th of 136
  • Defense52nd of 136
  • Offense, opponent-adjusted84th of 136
  • Defense, opponent-adjusted39th of 136
EPA per playSuccessExplosivenessFBS rank
Offense0.0138%1.32107th of 136
Defense0.0642%1.1752nd of 136
Opponent-adjusted0.06 off
0.03 def
42% off
40% def
—84th off
39th def

Passing and running

Pass successDepth of targetDeep throwsLine yardsStuffed
Offense41%9.0 yds15%3.0016%
Defense46%8.2 yds8%2.8019%
How these are measured

Play-weighted averages over games against FBS opponents; raw numbers, not adjusted for the strength of the opponent. EPA (expected points added) measures how much each play changed the expected score; success rate counts plays that kept the offense on schedule; explosiveness is the average EPA on successful plays. Lower is better on defense. Ranked by EPA per play among teams that were FBS that season. The opponent-adjusted row (offense / defense) is CollegeFootballData.com’s WEPA, which accounts for who each team played. Passing and running: depth of target is how far downfield passes traveled in the air; deep throws are the share thrown deep, of the passes whose depth and direction the play-by-play describes (about half); line yards are the running yards per carry credited to the blockers; stuffed is the share of carries stopped at or behind the line. The defense’s line is what its opponents did. From CollegeFootballData.com, 2025 on.

Drives and havoc

Points per trip inside the 40Average startHavoc
Offense2.6own 2720% allowed
Defense3.1own 3016% caused

CORE rating -0.3, 66th of 136 (offense -5.1, defense -4.8).

A trip inside the 40 is a drive that reaches the opponent’s 40-yard line; points per trip is how many it scored on average (allowed, on defense). Average start is where drives began (the defense’s line is where its opponents started). Havoc is the share of plays ending in a tackle for loss, a forced fumble, an interception or a pass broken up. CORE is CollegeFootballData.com’s context- and opponent-adjusted rating (points better than an average team; lower is better on defense). From CollegeFootballData.com.

Leaders

Passing yardsLanorris Sellers QB2,437 yds
Passing touchdownsLanorris Sellers QB13 TD
Rushing yardsRahsul Faison RB470 yds
Rushing touchdownsLanorris Sellers QB5 TD
Receiving yardsNyck Harbor WR618 yds
Receiving touchdownsNyck Harbor WR6 TD
TacklesD.Q. Smith DB64 tkl
SacksBryan Thomas Jr. LB7 sacks
InterceptionsGerald Kilgore DB2 INT

Top recruits in the 2025 class

Malik Clark WR★★★★No. 106
Donovan Murph WR★★★★No. 165
Jaquavious Dodd DE★★★★No. 213
Donovan Darden DE★★★★No. 214
Jordon Gidron WR★★★★No. 225
Adedamola Ajidahun OT★★★★No. 256
Brian Rowe Jr. WR★★★★No. 337
Kendall Daniels Jr. S★★★★No. 344

247Sports composite rankings via CollegeFootballData.com; national rank in the class.

The 2025 class by position

SignedStarsRating
Quarterbacks13.00.879
Receivers73.70.908
Offensive line24.00.902
Defensive line73.40.894
Linebackers23.00.871
Defensive backs33.30.882
Athletes and specialists33.30.840
Whole class253.50.888

High-school signees by position group, with their average stars and 247Sports composite rating (out of 1), via CollegeFootballData.com. Athletes are signees with no set position.

Drafted in 2026

The 2026 draft
Rd 2Brandon Cisse CBGreen Bay Packers
Rd 5Nick Barrett DTLos Angeles Chargers
Rd 5Jalon Kilgore SBuffalo Bills

Roster 114

The 2025 roster

114 players, with numbers, heights, hometowns and each player’s 2025 line; 64 have a stat line. See the roster

All-SEC

2 second team

Second team

From Wikipedia’s 2025 all-conference team article, with the selectors that named each player (AP-1: the Associated Press’s first team).

2025 Southeastern Conference standings

Conference page
TeamConf.OverallAP final
Ole Miss7–⁠113–⁠23
Georgia7–⁠112–⁠26
Texas A&M7–⁠111–⁠28
Alabama7–⁠111–⁠49
Texas6–⁠210–⁠312
Oklahoma6–⁠210–⁠313
Vanderbilt6–⁠210–⁠315
Missouri4–⁠48–⁠5
Tennessee4–⁠48–⁠5
LSU3–⁠57–⁠6
Kentucky2–⁠65–⁠7
Florida2–⁠64–⁠8
Auburn1–⁠75–⁠7
Mississippi State1–⁠75–⁠8
South Carolina1–⁠74–⁠8
Arkansas0–⁠82–⁠10

Ordered by conference winning percentage, then conference wins. Division splits and tiebreakers aren’t applied.