2026 Marshall

3–⁠3 (0–⁠2 Sun Belt Conference), coached by Tony Gibson.

Schedule and results

Marshall in 2026, game by game: lost at No. 18 Penn State 0–45; won vs. Middle Tennessee 28–26; won at Missouri State 30–24; won vs. Gardner-Webb 36–35; lost at James Madison 17–45; lost vs. Coastal Carolina 21–27+7−45Lost 0–45 at No. 18 Penn State-45No. 18 Penn StateWon 28–26 vs. Middle Tennessee+2Middle TennesseeWon 30–24 at Missouri State+6Missouri StateWon 36–35 vs. Gardner-Webb+1Gardner-WebbLost 17–45 at James Madison-28James MadisonLost 21–27 vs. Coastal Carolina-6Coastal Carolina
Each game’s margin, wins above the line and losses below.

Elo: a pregame chance from scores alone.

Record
3–⁠3
Conference
0–⁠2 tied for 12th in Sun Belt Conference
AP now
Unranked
Points
132–⁠202
Coach
Tony Gibson
Elo
1476 −36 this season
SP+ rating
-13.2 No. 119 of 138; offense No. 90, defense No. 133, special teams No. 70
SRS
−18.9 No. 132 of 138 in FBS
Returning
99% of last season’s EPA, No. 2 of 136
Recruiting class
No. 123 roster talent No. 97 in FBS
Offensive coordinator
Rod Smith
Defensive coordinator
Brad Lambert
Offense
Spread option
Defense
3–⁠3–⁠5

How good, play by play

  • Offense75th of 138
  • Defense130th of 138
  • Offense, opponent-adjusted80th of 138
  • Defense, opponent-adjusted133rd of 138
EPA per playSuccessExplosivenessFBS rank
Offense0.1045%1.1475th of 138
Defense0.3047%1.22130th of 138
Opponent-adjusted0.09 off
0.23 def
42% off
47% def
—80th off
133rd def

Passing and running

Pass successDepth of targetDeep throwsLine yardsStuffed
Offense43%9.2 yds13%3.3015%
Defense48%9.3 yds13%3.1015%
How these are measured

Play-weighted averages over games against FBS opponents; raw numbers, not adjusted for the strength of the opponent. EPA (expected points added) measures how much each play changed the expected score; success rate counts plays that kept the offense on schedule; explosiveness is the average EPA on successful plays. Lower is better on defense. Ranked by EPA per play among teams that were FBS that season. The opponent-adjusted row (offense / defense) is CollegeFootballData.com’s WEPA, which accounts for who each team played. Passing and running: depth of target is how far downfield passes traveled in the air; deep throws are the share thrown deep, of the passes whose depth and direction the play-by-play describes (about half); line yards are the running yards per carry credited to the blockers; stuffed is the share of carries stopped at or behind the line. The defense’s line is what its opponents did. From CollegeFootballData.com, 2025 on.

Drives and havoc

Points per trip inside the 40Average startHavoc
Offense2.5own 2717% allowed
Defense4.0own 3013% caused

CORE rating -12.4, 118th of 138 (offense 1.8, defense 14.2).

A trip inside the 40 is a drive that reaches the opponent’s 40-yard line; points per trip is how many it scored on average (allowed, on defense). Average start is where drives began (the defense’s line is where its opponents started). Havoc is the share of plays ending in a tackle for loss, a forced fumble, an interception or a pass broken up. CORE is CollegeFootballData.com’s context- and opponent-adjusted rating (points better than an average team; lower is better on defense). From CollegeFootballData.com.

Leaders

Passing yardsCarlos Del Rio-Wilson QB1,014 yds
Passing touchdownsCarlos Del Rio-Wilson QB6 TD
Rushing yardsJoshon Barbie RB230 yds
Rushing touchdownsCarlos Del Rio-Wilson QB2 TD
Receiving yardsXayvion Turner-Bradshaw WR324 yds
Receiving touchdownsXayvion Turner-Bradshaw WR4 TD
TacklesCaleb Clark-Glover DB44 tkl
SacksNate Blanc DT1.5 sacks
InterceptionsCaleb Clark-Glover DB1 INT

Top recruits in the 2026 class

Justyn Lyles OL★★★No. 1174
Caden Turner DE★★★No. 1566
Brennan Chambers WR★★★No. 1846
Andre Parker LB★★★No. 1914
Jae’Von White OT★★★No. 2022

247Sports composite rankings via CollegeFootballData.com; national rank in the class.

The 2026 class by position

SignedStarsRating
Quarterbacks13.00.830
Receivers13.00.855
Offensive line43.00.845
Defensive line13.00.860
Linebackers33.00.840
Defensive backs23.00.850
Athletes and specialists43.00.819
Whole class163.00.839

High-school signees by position group, with their average stars and 247Sports composite rating (out of 1), via CollegeFootballData.com. Athletes are signees with no set position.

Roster 105

The 2026 roster

105 players, with numbers, heights, hometowns and each player’s 2026 line; 50 have a stat line. See the roster

2026 Sun Belt Conference standings

Conference page
TeamConf.OverallAP final
James Madison4–⁠07–⁠0
South Alabama2–⁠04–⁠2
Louisiana Tech2–⁠04–⁠2
Louisiana2–⁠15–⁠2
Georgia Southern2–⁠13–⁠4
Georgia State1–⁠14–⁠2
App State1–⁠14–⁠2
Troy1–⁠13–⁠3
Arkansas State1–⁠23–⁠4
Coastal Carolina1–⁠22–⁠5
Old Dominion1–⁠32–⁠5
Marshall0–⁠23–⁠3
Southern Miss0–⁠21–⁠5
UL Monroe0–⁠20–⁠6

Ordered by conference winning percentage, then conference wins. Division splits and tiebreakers aren’t applied.