2026 Louisiana Tech

4–⁠2 (2–⁠0 Sun Belt Conference), coached by Sonny Cumbie. The season’s Wikipedia article records 3–⁠2, over five games to the six on file here.

Schedule and results

Louisiana Tech in 2026, game by game: won vs. Northwestern State 80–6; lost at No. 8 LSU 14–45; lost at Baylor 19–36; won vs. Army 31–29; won vs. Louisiana 32–31; won at UL Monroe 24–0+74−31Won 80–6 vs. Northwestern State+74Northwestern St…Lost 14–45 at No. 8 LSU-31No. 8 LSULost 19–36 at Baylor-17BaylorWon 31–29 vs. Army+2ArmyWon 32–31 vs. Louisiana+1LouisianaWon 24–0 at UL Monroe+24UL Monroe
Each game’s margin, wins above the line and losses below.

Elo: a pregame chance from scores alone.

Record
4–⁠2
Conference
2–⁠0 shared first in Sun Belt Conference
AP now
Unranked
Points
200–⁠147
Coach
Sonny Cumbie
Elo
1502 −1 this season
SP+ rating
-5.9 No. 96 of 138; offense No. 83, defense No. 109, special teams No. 100
SRS
−3.5 No. 82 of 138 in FBS
Returning
64% of last season’s EPA, No. 37 of 136
Recruiting class
No. 99 roster talent No. 124 in FBS
Offensive coordinator
Nathan Young
Defensive coordinator
Luke Olson
Offense
Spread
Defense
3–⁠3–⁠5

How good, play by play

  • Offense95th of 138
  • Defense55th of 138
  • Offense, opponent-adjusted92nd of 138
  • Defense, opponent-adjusted64th of 138
EPA per playSuccessExplosivenessFBS rank
Offense0.0440%1.2395th of 138
Defense0.0642%1.3755th of 138
Opponent-adjusted0.07 off
0.09 def
41% off
40% def
—92nd off
64th def

Passing and running

Pass successDepth of targetDeep throwsLine yardsStuffed
Offense48%7.0 yds9%2.8017%
Defense40%10.7 yds21%2.6023%
How these are measured

Play-weighted averages over games against FBS opponents; raw numbers, not adjusted for the strength of the opponent. EPA (expected points added) measures how much each play changed the expected score; success rate counts plays that kept the offense on schedule; explosiveness is the average EPA on successful plays. Lower is better on defense. Ranked by EPA per play among teams that were FBS that season. The opponent-adjusted row (offense / defense) is CollegeFootballData.com’s WEPA, which accounts for who each team played. Passing and running: depth of target is how far downfield passes traveled in the air; deep throws are the share thrown deep, of the passes whose depth and direction the play-by-play describes (about half); line yards are the running yards per carry credited to the blockers; stuffed is the share of carries stopped at or behind the line. The defense’s line is what its opponents did. From CollegeFootballData.com, 2025 on.

Drives and havoc

Points per trip inside the 40Average startHavoc
Offense3.9own 3416% allowed
Defense3.3own 3121% caused

CORE rating 2.6, 53rd of 138 (offense -1.1, defense -3.7).

A trip inside the 40 is a drive that reaches the opponent’s 40-yard line; points per trip is how many it scored on average (allowed, on defense). Average start is where drives began (the defense’s line is where its opponents started). Havoc is the share of plays ending in a tackle for loss, a forced fumble, an interception or a pass broken up. CORE is CollegeFootballData.com’s context- and opponent-adjusted rating (points better than an average team; lower is better on defense). From CollegeFootballData.com.

Leaders

Passing yardsBlake Baker QB857 yds
Passing touchdownsBlake Baker QB9 TD
Rushing yardsAndrew Burnette RB273 yds
Rushing touchdownsSergio Snider RB3 TD
Receiving yardsJalen Mickens WR476 yds
Receiving touchdownsEli Finley TE4 TD
TacklesAlonzo Jackson Jr. LB41 tkl
SacksAlonzo Jackson Jr. LB5 sacks
InterceptionsJordan McRae DB3 INT

Top recruits in the 2026 class

Demarcus Belton RB★★★No. 1114
A.J. Tarvin CB★★★No. 1336
Kenny Thomas RB★★★No. 1566
Nathan Green S★★★No. 1654
Rayshun Hurt RB★★★No. 1846

247Sports composite rankings via CollegeFootballData.com; national rank in the class.

The 2026 class by position

SignedStarsRating
Quarterbacks13.00.852
Running backs33.00.862
Receivers23.00.844
Offensive line23.00.828
Defensive line23.00.846
Linebackers33.00.845
Defensive backs53.00.851
Athletes and specialists13.00.851
Whole class193.00.848

High-school signees by position group, with their average stars and 247Sports composite rating (out of 1), via CollegeFootballData.com. Athletes are signees with no set position.

Roster 110

The 2026 roster

110 players, with numbers, heights, hometowns and each player’s 2026 line; 67 have a stat line. See the roster

2026 Sun Belt Conference standings

Conference page
TeamConf.OverallAP final
James Madison4–⁠07–⁠0
South Alabama2–⁠04–⁠2
Louisiana Tech2–⁠04–⁠2
Louisiana2–⁠15–⁠2
Georgia Southern2–⁠13–⁠4
Georgia State1–⁠14–⁠2
App State1–⁠14–⁠2
Troy1–⁠13–⁠3
Arkansas State1–⁠23–⁠4
Coastal Carolina1–⁠22–⁠5
Old Dominion1–⁠32–⁠5
Marshall0–⁠23–⁠3
Southern Miss0–⁠21–⁠5
UL Monroe0–⁠20–⁠6

Ordered by conference winning percentage, then conference wins. Division splits and tiebreakers aren’t applied.