CollegeFootballDigestfrom CooperSearch

Lindenwood football money

In 2024-25, Lindenwood football brought in $4.2 million and spent $4.2 million, the 92nd-most revenue of 122 FCS programs. That’s $833,000 for each of its 5 wins. 110 players were on the roster, with 12 assistant coaches.

Revenue and expenses

2012: revenue $2.0 million2012: expenses $2.0 million’122013: revenue $1.8 million2013: expenses $1.8 million2014: revenue $2.1 million2014: expenses $2.1 million’142015: revenue $2.1 million2015: expenses $2.1 million2016: revenue $2.6 million2016: expenses $2.6 million’162017: revenue $2.6 million2017: expenses $2.6 million2018: revenue $2.5 million2018: expenses $2.5 million’182019: revenue $2.4 million2019: expenses $2.4 million2020: revenue $2.2 million2020: expenses $2.2 million’202021: revenue $2.7 million2021: expenses $2.7 million2022: revenue $3.3 million2022: expenses $3.3 million’222023: revenue $3.7 million2023: expenses $3.7 million2024: revenue $4.2 million2024: expenses $4.2 million’24

Revenue Expenses (top: $4.2M)

Beside the Big South–OVC Football Association, 2024-25

5th of 8 in revenue
  1. Tennessee State$6.9M / $6.9M
  2. Eastern Illinois$5.0M / $5.0M
  3. Gardner-Webb$4.5M / $4.5M
  4. Charleston Southern$4.3M / $4.3M
  5. Lindenwood$4.2M / $4.2M
  6. UT Martin$3.9M / $4.0M
  7. Southeast Missouri State$3.7M / $3.7M
  8. Western Illinois$3.5M / $3.5M

Each member’s football revenue (the thick bar) and expenses (the thin one under it) that year, as the schools reported them; schools count revenue differently.

Against the OVC

revenue, 2012-13 to 2024-25

  1. Tennessee State

    $6.9M in 24–⁠25

  2. Eastern Illinois

    $5.0M in 24–⁠25

  3. Gardner-Webb

    $4.5M in 24–⁠25

  4. Charleston Southern

    $4.3M in 24–⁠25

  5. Lindenwood

    $4.2M in 24–⁠25

  6. UT Martin

    $3.9M in 24–⁠25

  7. Southeast Missouri State

    $3.7M in 24–⁠25

  8. Western Illinois

    $3.5M in 24–⁠25

Each program’s football revenue by season, as each school reports it (EADA), on one scale (top: $7.4M), for the programs in the OVC this season, most revenue first; Lindenwood in its color.

By season

SeasonRevenueExpensesRecordSpent a winRankRosterAssistants
2024-25$4.2M$4.2M5–⁠7$0.8M92 of 12211012
2023-24$3.7M$3.7M3–⁠7$1.2M97 of 12010212
2022-23$3.3M$3.3M7–⁠3$0.5M102 of 12210312
2021-22$2.7M$2.7M9–⁠3$0.3M3 of 711710
2020-21$2.2M$2.2M2 of 21129
2019-20$2.4M$2.4M0–⁠14 of 912719
2018-19$2.5M$2.5M3 of 1116017
2017-18$2.6M$2.6M2 of 1223421
2016-17$2.6M$2.6M1 of 1219126
2015-16$2.1M$2.1M3 of 1119416
2014-15$2.1M$2.1M3 of 1125824
2013-14$1.8M$1.8M3 of 1122824
2012-13$2.0M$2.0M3 of 1224423

As Lindenwood University reports them to the US Department of Education under the Equity in Athletics Disclosure Act (ope.ed.gov/athletics). Schools count revenue differently (some include institutional support), so compare with care. “Spent a win” is the year’s football expenses over that season’s wins. Rank is football revenue among programs in the same division that season. Browse every school’s in the data.