CollegeFootballDigestfrom CooperSearch

UT Martin football money

In 2024-25, UT Martin football brought in $3.9 million and spent $4.0 million, the 94th-most revenue of 122 FCS programs. That’s $442,000 for each of its 9 wins. 116 players were on the roster, with 8 assistant coaches.

Revenue and expenses

2012: revenue $2.7 million2012: expenses $2.6 million’122013: revenue $3.1 million2013: expenses $3.0 million2014: revenue $2.9 million2014: expenses $2.9 million’142015: revenue $2.7 million2015: expenses $2.7 million2016: revenue $3.1 million2016: expenses $3.1 million’162017: revenue $3.0 million2017: expenses $2.9 million2018: revenue $3.4 million2018: expenses $3.2 million’182019: revenue $3.2 million2019: expenses $3.3 million2020: revenue $2.9 million2020: expenses $2.9 million’202021: revenue $3.8 million2021: expenses $3.8 million2022: revenue $3.9 million2022: expenses $3.8 million’222023: revenue $3.8 million2023: expenses $3.8 million2024: revenue $3.9 million2024: expenses $4.0 million’24

Revenue Expenses (top: $4.0M)

Beside the Big South–OVC Football Association, 2024-25

6th of 8 in revenue
  1. Tennessee State$6.9M / $6.9M
  2. Eastern Illinois$5.0M / $5.0M
  3. Gardner-Webb$4.5M / $4.5M
  4. Charleston Southern$4.3M / $4.3M
  5. Lindenwood$4.2M / $4.2M
  6. UT Martin$3.9M / $4.0M
  7. Southeast Missouri State$3.7M / $3.7M
  8. Western Illinois$3.5M / $3.5M

Each member’s football revenue (the thick bar) and expenses (the thin one under it) that year, as the schools reported them; schools count revenue differently.

Against the OVC

revenue, 2012-13 to 2024-25

  1. Tennessee State

    $6.9M in 24–⁠25

  2. Eastern Illinois

    $5.0M in 24–⁠25

  3. Gardner-Webb

    $4.5M in 24–⁠25

  4. Charleston Southern

    $4.3M in 24–⁠25

  5. Lindenwood

    $4.2M in 24–⁠25

  6. UT Martin

    $3.9M in 24–⁠25

  7. Southeast Missouri State

    $3.7M in 24–⁠25

  8. Western Illinois

    $3.5M in 24–⁠25

Each program’s football revenue by season, as each school reports it (EADA), on one scale (top: $7.4M), for the programs in the OVC this season, most revenue first; UT Martin in its color.

By season

SeasonRevenueExpensesRecordSpent a winRankRosterAssistants
2024-25$3.9M$4.0M9–⁠5$0.4M94 of 1221168
2023-24$3.8M$3.8M8–⁠3$0.5M94 of 1201498
2022-23$3.9M$3.8M7–⁠4$0.5M83 of 1221428
2021-22$3.8M$3.8M10–⁠3$0.4M84 of 1191048
2020-21$2.9M$2.9M3–⁠4$1.0M80 of 1011018
2019-20$3.2M$3.3M7–⁠5$0.5M82 of 1171088
2018-19$3.4M$3.2M2–⁠9$1.6M78 of 1151209
2017-18$3.0M$2.9M6–⁠5$0.5M90 of 1131118
2016-17$3.1M$3.1M7–⁠5$0.4M78 of 1131098
2015-16$2.7M$2.7M7–⁠4$0.4M90 of 113978
2014-15$2.9M$2.9M6–⁠6$0.5M80 of 112918
2013-14$3.1M$3.0M2–⁠2$1.5M64 of 112878
2012-13$2.7M$2.6M8–⁠3$0.3M76 of 114939

As The University of Tennessee–Martin reports them to the US Department of Education under the Equity in Athletics Disclosure Act (ope.ed.gov/athletics). Schools count revenue differently (some include institutional support), so compare with care. “Spent a win” is the year’s football expenses over that season’s wins. Rank is football revenue among programs in the same division that season. Browse every school’s in the data.