CollegeFootballDigestfrom CooperSearch

Southeast Missouri State football money

In 2024-25, Southeast Missouri State football brought in $3.7 million and spent $3.7 million, the 99th-most revenue of 122 FCS programs. That’s $409,000 for each of its 9 wins. 104 players were on the roster, with 12 assistant coaches.

Revenue and expenses

2012: revenue $2.2 million2012: expenses $2.2 million’122013: revenue $2.9 million2013: expenses $2.9 million2014: revenue $2.7 million2014: expenses $2.7 million’142015: revenue $2.7 million2015: expenses $2.7 million2016: revenue $2.7 million2016: expenses $2.7 million’162017: revenue $2.7 million2017: expenses $2.7 million2018: revenue $3.1 million2018: expenses $3.1 million’182019: revenue $3.2 million2019: expenses $3.2 million2020: revenue $2.9 million2020: expenses $2.9 million’202021: revenue $3.2 million2021: expenses $3.2 million2022: revenue $3.7 million2022: expenses $3.7 million’222023: revenue $3.8 million2023: expenses $3.8 million2024: revenue $3.7 million2024: expenses $3.7 million’24

Revenue Expenses (top: $3.8M)

Beside the Big South–OVC Football Association, 2024-25

7th of 8 in revenue
  1. Tennessee State$6.9M / $6.9M
  2. Eastern Illinois$5.0M / $5.0M
  3. Gardner-Webb$4.5M / $4.5M
  4. Charleston Southern$4.3M / $4.3M
  5. Lindenwood$4.2M / $4.2M
  6. UT Martin$3.9M / $4.0M
  7. Southeast Missouri State$3.7M / $3.7M
  8. Western Illinois$3.5M / $3.5M

Each member’s football revenue (the thick bar) and expenses (the thin one under it) that year, as the schools reported them; schools count revenue differently.

Against the OVC

revenue, 2012-13 to 2024-25

  1. Tennessee State

    $6.9M in 24–⁠25

  2. Eastern Illinois

    $5.0M in 24–⁠25

  3. Gardner-Webb

    $4.5M in 24–⁠25

  4. Charleston Southern

    $4.3M in 24–⁠25

  5. Lindenwood

    $4.2M in 24–⁠25

  6. UT Martin

    $3.9M in 24–⁠25

  7. Southeast Missouri State

    $3.7M in 24–⁠25

  8. Western Illinois

    $3.5M in 24–⁠25

Each program’s football revenue by season, as each school reports it (EADA), on one scale (top: $7.4M), for the programs in the OVC this season, most revenue first; Southeast Missouri State in its color.

By season

SeasonRevenueExpensesRecordSpent a winRankRosterAssistants
2024-25$3.7M$3.7M9–⁠4$0.4M99 of 12210412
2023-24$3.8M$3.8M4–⁠7$0.9M96 of 12011010
2022-23$3.7M$3.7M9–⁠3$0.4M91 of 1221189
2021-22$3.2M$3.2M4–⁠7$0.8M93 of 1191009
2020-21$2.9M$2.9M4–⁠4$0.7M79 of 10110210
2019-20$3.2M$3.2M9–⁠4$0.4M83 of 11710110
2018-19$3.1M$3.1M9–⁠4$0.3M93 of 115989
2017-18$2.7M$2.7M3–⁠8$0.9M99 of 11311010
2016-17$2.7M$2.7M3–⁠8$0.9M96 of 11311010
2015-16$2.7M$2.7M4–⁠7$0.7M91 of 11310210
2014-15$2.7M$2.7M5–⁠7$0.5M86 of 11210411
2013-14$2.9M$2.9M0–⁠370 of 1129811
2012-13$2.2M$2.2M3–⁠8$0.7M94 of 11410311

As Southeast Missouri State University reports them to the US Department of Education under the Equity in Athletics Disclosure Act (ope.ed.gov/athletics). Schools count revenue differently (some include institutional support), so compare with care. “Spent a win” is the year’s football expenses over that season’s wins. Rank is football revenue among programs in the same division that season. Browse every school’s in the data.