Stanford football money
In 2024-25, Stanford football brought in $36.0 million and spent $36.0 million, the 63rd-most revenue of 124 FBS programs. That’s $12.0 million for each of its 3 wins. 110 players were on the roster, with 10 assistant coaches.
Revenue and expenses
Revenue Expenses (top: $47.5M)
Beside the Atlantic Coast Conference, 2024-25
15th of 16 in revenue- Miami$99.9M / $88.1M
- Clemson$86.9M / $81.1M
- Florida State$83.5M / $83.3M
- Virginia Tech$79.7M / $37.8M
- Georgia Tech$70.5M / $42.7M
- NC State$69.8M / $40.5M
- Duke$67.4M / $47.4M
- Syracuse$64.6M / $42.1M
- California$64.0M / $46.7M
- North Carolina$63.3M / $49.1M
- Virginia$51.4M / $33.6M
- Boston College$47.5M / $41.2M
- SMU$45.3M / $45.3M
- Wake Forest$39.4M / $39.4M
- Stanford$36.0M / $36.0M
- Louisville$33.1M / $30.7M
Each member’s football revenue (the thick bar) and expenses (the thin one under it) that year, as the schools reported them; schools count revenue differently.
Against the ACC
revenue, 2012-13 to 2024-25$99.9M in 24–25
$86.9M in 24–25
$83.5M in 24–25
$79.7M in 24–25
$70.5M in 24–25
$69.8M in 24–25
$67.4M in 24–25
$64.6M in 24–25
$64.0M in 24–25
$63.3M in 24–25
$51.4M in 24–25
$47.5M in 24–25
$45.3M in 24–25
$39.4M in 24–25
Stanford
$36.0M in 24–25
$33.1M in 24–25
Each program’s football revenue by season, as each school reports it (EADA), on one scale (top: $99.9M), for the programs in the ACC this season, most revenue first; Stanford in its color.
By season
| Season | Revenue | Expenses | Record | Spent a win | Rank | Roster | Assistants |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-25 | $36.0M | $36.0M | 3–9 | $12.0M | 63 of 124 | 110 | 10 |
| 2023-24 | $33.7M | $33.7M | 3–9 | $11.2M | 63 of 125 | 107 | 10 |
| 2022-23 | $39.7M | $33.0M | 3–9 | $11.0M | 59 of 123 | 111 | 10 |
| 2021-22 | $47.5M | $32.1M | 3–9 | $10.7M | 48 of 122 | 109 | 10 |
| 2020-21 | $27.6M | $27.6M | 4–2 | $6.9M | 49 of 120 | 103 | 10 |
| 2019-20 | $40.9M | $27.7M | 4–8 | $6.9M | 50 of 123 | 102 | 10 |
| 2018-19 | $44.5M | $30.5M | 9–4 | $3.4M | 44 of 123 | 102 | 10 |
| 2017-18 | $46.8M | $27.0M | 9–5 | $3.0M | 36 of 123 | 103 | 10 |
| 2016-17 | $44.5M | $24.6M | 10–3 | $2.5M | 32 of 121 | 103 | 9 |
| 2015-16 | $43.7M | $23.7M | 12–2 | $2.0M | 31 of 122 | 100 | 9 |
| 2014-15 | $37.5M | $19.9M | 8–5 | $2.5M | 39 of 122 | 113 | 9 |
| 2013-14 | $36.7M | $20.9M | 11–3 | $1.9M | 35 of 122 | 113 | 9 |
| 2012-13 | $24.8M | $16.7M | 12–2 | $1.4M | 54 of 119 | 121 | 9 |
As Stanford University reports them to the US Department of Education under the Equity in Athletics Disclosure Act (ope.ed.gov/athletics). Schools count revenue differently (some include institutional support), so compare with care. “Spent a win” is the year’s football expenses over that season’s wins. Rank is football revenue among programs in the same division that season. Browse every school’s in the data.