2007 Southern Miss

7–⁠6 (5–⁠3 Conference USA), coached by Jeff Bower.

Schedule and results

Southern Miss in 2007, game by game: won vs. UT Martin 35–13; lost at No. 24 Tennessee 19–39; won at East Carolina 28–21; lost at Boise State 16–38; lost vs. Rice 29–31; won vs. SMU 28–7; won at Marshall 33–24; lost vs. UCF 17–34; won at UAB 37–7; lost vs. Memphis 26–29; won at UTEP 56–30; won vs. Arkansas State 16–10; lost vs. No. 20 Cincinnati 21–31+30−22Won 35–13 vs. UT Martin+22UT MartinLost 19–39 at No. 24 Tennessee-20No. 24 TennesseeWon 28–21 at East Carolina+7East CarolinaLost 16–38 at Boise State-22Boise StateLost 29–31 vs. Rice-2RiceWon 28–7 vs. SMU+21SMUWon 33–24 at Marshall+9MarshallLost 17–34 vs. UCF-17UCFWon 37–7 at UAB+30UABLost 26–29 vs. Memphis-3MemphisWon 56–30 at UTEP+26UTEPWon 16–10 vs. Arkansas State+6Arkansas StateLost 21–31 vs. No. 20 Cincinnati-10No. 20 Cincinnati
Each game’s margin, wins above the line and losses below.
DateOpponentResultElo
Sep 1vsUT MartinW 35–⁠1382%
Sep 8at24TennesseeL 19–⁠3941%
Sep 15atEast CarolinaW 28–⁠2148%
Sep 27atBoise StateL 16–⁠3830%
Oct 3vsRiceL 29–⁠3178%
Oct 13vsSMUW 28–⁠774%
Oct 21atMarshallW 33–⁠2466%
Oct 28vsUCFL 17–⁠3469%
Nov 3atUABW 37–⁠767%
Nov 10vsMemphisL 26–⁠2978%
Nov 17atUTEPW 56–⁠3062%
Nov 24vsArkansas StateW 16–⁠1076%
Dec 22vs20CincinnatiPapaJohns.com BowlL 21–⁠3135%

Elo: a pregame chance from scores alone.

How it ended: Lost to Cincinnati 31–⁠21 in the PapaJohns.com Bowl; unranked in the final AP poll; 6th in the Conference USA.

In program history: The 29th-best season in program history by end-of-season Elo (of 90 on file).

Record
7–⁠6
Conference
5–⁠3 6th in Conference USA
AP final
Unranked
Points
361–⁠314
Coach
Jeff Bower
Elo
1528 −28 this season
SP+ rating
-0.5 No. 67 of 120; offense No. 68, defense No. 64, special teams No. 35
SRS
−3.9 No. 74 of 119 in FBS
Recruiting class
No. 58
Offensive coordinator
Jay Johnson
Defensive coordinator
Jay Hopson
Offense
Multiple
Defense
4–⁠3

How good, play by play

  • Offense26th of 119
  • Defense55th of 119
EPA per playSuccessExplosivenessFBS rank
Offense0.0842%0.9126th of 119
Defense0.0443%0.9255th of 119
How these are measured

Play-weighted averages over games against FBS opponents; raw numbers, not adjusted for the strength of the opponent. EPA (expected points added) measures how much each play changed the expected score; success rate counts plays that kept the offense on schedule; explosiveness is the average EPA on successful plays. Lower is better on defense. Ranked by EPA per play among teams that were FBS that season.

Drives and havoc

Points per trip inside the 40Average startHavoc
Offense0.0own 293% allowed
Defense0.0own 323% caused

A trip inside the 40 is a drive that reaches the opponent’s 40-yard line; points per trip is how many it scored on average (allowed, on defense). Average start is where drives began (the defense’s line is where its opponents started). Havoc is the share of plays ending in a tackle for loss, a forced fumble, an interception or a pass broken up. From CollegeFootballData.com.

Top recruits in the 2007 class

Antwain Easterling RB★★★★No. 100
Ken Dailey CB★★★No. 608
Rashod Henry ATH★★★No. 879
Deddrick Jones WDE★★★No. 1167
Tim Green OLB★★No. 1390

247Sports composite rankings via CollegeFootballData.com; national rank in the class.

The 2007 class by position

SignedStarsRating
Quarterbacks12.00.767
Running backs23.00.845
Receivers12.00.767
Offensive line22.00.756
Defensive line52.20.749
Linebackers32.00.774
Defensive backs62.20.780
Athletes and specialists32.30.774
Whole class232.20.774

High-school signees by position group, with their average stars and 247Sports composite rating (out of 1), via CollegeFootballData.com. Athletes are signees with no set position.

Drafted in 2008

The 2008 draft
Rd 6Robert Henderson DENew York Giants

2007 Conference USA standings

TeamConf.OverallAP final
UCF7–⁠110–⁠4
Tulsa6–⁠210–⁠4
East Carolina6–⁠28–⁠5
Houston6–⁠28–⁠5
Memphis6–⁠27–⁠6
Southern Miss5–⁠37–⁠6
Tulane3–⁠54–⁠8
Marshall3–⁠53–⁠9
Rice3–⁠53–⁠9
UTEP2–⁠64–⁠8
UAB1–⁠72–⁠10
SMU0–⁠81–⁠11

Ordered by conference winning percentage, then conference wins. Division splits and tiebreakers aren’t applied.