2006 Southern Miss

9–⁠5 (6–⁠2 Conference USA), coached by Jeff Bower.

Schedule and results

Southern Miss in 2006, game by game: lost at No. 7 Florida 7–34; won vs. SE Louisiana 45–0; won vs. NC State 37–17; won at UCF 19–14; lost at Tulsa 6–20; won vs. Houston 31–27; lost at Virginia Tech 6–36; lost vs. East Carolina 17–20; won at Memphis 42–21; won at Tulane 31–3; won vs. UAB 25–20; won vs. Marshall 42–7; lost at Houston 20–34; won vs. Ohio 28–7+45−30Lost 7–34 at No. 7 Florida-27No. 7 FloridaWon 45–0 vs. SE Louisiana+45SE LouisianaWon 37–17 vs. NC State+20NC StateWon 19–14 at UCF+5UCFLost 6–20 at Tulsa-14TulsaWon 31–27 vs. Houston+4HoustonLost 6–36 at Virginia Tech-30Virginia TechLost 17–20 vs. East Carolina-3East CarolinaWon 42–21 at Memphis+21MemphisWon 31–3 at Tulane+28TulaneWon 25–20 vs. UAB+5UABWon 42–7 vs. Marshall+35MarshallLost 20–34 at Houston-14HoustonWon 28–7 vs. Ohio+21Ohio
Each game’s margin, wins above the line and losses below.
DateOpponentResultElo
Sep 2at7FloridaL 7–⁠3430%
Sep 9vsSE LouisianaW 45–⁠083%
Sep 16vsNC StateW 37–⁠1756%
Sep 26atUCFW 19–⁠1457%
Oct 3atTulsaL 6–⁠2042%
Oct 14vsHoustonW 31–⁠2763%
Oct 21atVirginia TechL 6–⁠3629%
Oct 28vsEast CarolinaL 17–⁠2067%
Nov 5atMemphisW 42–⁠2160%
Nov 11atTulaneW 31–⁠366%
Nov 18vsUABW 25–⁠2077%
Nov 25vsMarshallW 42–⁠769%
Dec 1atHoustonConference USA Championship GameL 20–⁠3442%
Jan 7vsOhioGMAC BowlW 28–⁠758%

Elo: a pregame chance from scores alone.

How it ended: Beat Ohio 28–⁠7 in the GMAC Bowl; unranked in the final AP poll; tied for 2nd in the Conference USA.

In program history: The 14th-best season in program history by end-of-season Elo (of 90 on file).

C-USA East champions6–⁠2 in the conference

Record
9–⁠5
Conference
6–⁠2 tied for 2nd in Conference USA
AP final
Unranked
Points
356–⁠260
Coach
Jeff Bower
Elo
1585 +62 this season
SP+ rating
-0.3 No. 62 of 119; offense No. 68, defense No. 60, special teams No. 75
SRS
1.9 No. 55 of 119 in FBS
Recruiting class
No. 64
Offensive coordinator
Jay Johnson
Defensive coordinator
Jay Hopson
Offense
Multiple
Defense
4–⁠3

How good, play by play

  • Offense53rd of 119
  • Defense65th of 119
EPA per playSuccessExplosivenessFBS rank
Offense0.0441%0.9353rd of 119
Defense0.0539%1.0365th of 119
How these are measured

Play-weighted averages over games against FBS opponents; raw numbers, not adjusted for the strength of the opponent. EPA (expected points added) measures how much each play changed the expected score; success rate counts plays that kept the offense on schedule; explosiveness is the average EPA on successful plays. Lower is better on defense. Ranked by EPA per play among teams that were FBS that season.

Drives and havoc

Points per trip inside the 40Average startHavoc
Offense-0.2own 313% allowed
Defense-0.1own 293% caused

A trip inside the 40 is a drive that reaches the opponent’s 40-yard line; points per trip is how many it scored on average (allowed, on defense). Average start is where drives began (the defense’s line is where its opponents started). Havoc is the share of plays ending in a tackle for loss, a forced fumble, an interception or a pass broken up. From CollegeFootballData.com.

Top recruits in the 2006 class

Ryan Ellis WR★★★No. 981
C.J. Bailey CB★★★No. 1028
Tory Harrison RB★★★No. 1045
Brandon Davis S★★No. 1212
Damion Fletcher APB★★No. 1216

247Sports composite rankings via CollegeFootballData.com; national rank in the class.

The 2006 class by position

SignedStarsRating
Quarterbacks12.00.789
Running backs32.30.768
Receivers52.20.742
Offensive line22.00.745
Defensive line12.00.789
Defensive backs32.30.799
Athletes and specialists32.00.722
Whole class182.20.758

High-school signees by position group, with their average stars and 247Sports composite rating (out of 1), via CollegeFootballData.com. Athletes are signees with no set position.

2006 Conference USA standings

TeamConf.OverallAP final
Houston7–⁠110–⁠4
Southern Miss6–⁠29–⁠5
Rice6–⁠27–⁠6
Tulsa5–⁠38–⁠5
East Carolina5–⁠37–⁠6
SMU4–⁠46–⁠6
Marshall4–⁠45–⁠7
UTEP3–⁠55–⁠7
UCF3–⁠54–⁠8
Tulane2–⁠64–⁠8
UAB2–⁠63–⁠9
Memphis1–⁠72–⁠10

Ordered by conference winning percentage, then conference wins. Division splits and tiebreakers aren’t applied.