2022 Ole Miss

8–⁠5 (4–⁠4 Southeastern Conference), coached by Lane Kiffin.

Schedule and results

Ole Miss in 2022, game by game: won vs. Troy 28–10; won vs. Central Arkansas 59–3; won at Georgia Tech 42–0; won vs. Tulsa 35–27; won vs. No. 7 Kentucky 22–19; won at Vanderbilt 52–28; won vs. Auburn 48–34; lost at LSU 20–45; won at Texas A&M 31–28; lost vs. No. 10 Alabama 24–30; lost at Arkansas 27–42; lost vs. Mississippi State 22–24; lost vs. Texas Tech 25–42+56−25Won 28–10 vs. Troy+18TroyWon 59–3 vs. Central Arkansas+56Central ArkansasWon 42–0 at Georgia Tech+42Georgia TechWon 35–27 vs. Tulsa+8TulsaWon 22–19 vs. No. 7 Kentucky+3No. 7 KentuckyWon 52–28 at Vanderbilt+24VanderbiltWon 48–34 vs. Auburn+14AuburnLost 20–45 at LSU-25LSUWon 31–28 at Texas A&M+3Texas A&MLost 24–30 vs. No. 10 Alabama-6No. 10 AlabamaLost 27–42 at Arkansas-15ArkansasLost 22–24 vs. Mississippi State-2Mississippi Sta…Lost 25–42 vs. Texas Tech-17Texas Tech
Each game’s margin, wins above the line and losses below.
DateOpponentResultElo
Sep 3vsTroyW 28–⁠1076%
Sep 10vsCentral ArkansasW 59–⁠389%
Sep 17atGeorgia TechW 42–⁠068%
Sep 24vsTulsaW 35–⁠2771%
Oct 1vs7KentuckyW 22–⁠1958%
Oct 8atVanderbiltW 52–⁠2875%
Oct 15vsAuburnW 48–⁠3479%
Oct 22atLSUL 20–⁠4558%
Oct 29atTexas A&MW 31–⁠2853%
Nov 12vs10AlabamaL 24–⁠3041%
Nov 19atArkansasL 27–⁠4250%
Nov 24vsMississippi StateL 22–⁠2463%
Dec 28vsTexas TechTexas BowlL 25–⁠4257%

Elo: a pregame chance from scores alone.

How it ended: Lost to Texas Tech 42–⁠25 in the Texas Bowl; unranked in the final AP poll; tied for 5th in the Southeastern Conference.

In program history: The 44th-best season in program history by end-of-season Elo (of 124 on file).

AP poll, week by week

  1. Wk 1: 21
  2. Wk 2: 22
  3. Wk 3: 20
  4. Wk 4: 16
  5. Wk 5: 14
  6. Wk 6: 9
  7. Wk 7: 9
  8. Wk 8: 7
  9. Wk 9: 15
  10. Wk 10: 11
  11. Wk 11: 11
  12. Wk 12: 14
  13. Wk 13: 20
Record
8–⁠5
Conference
4–⁠4 tied for 5th in Southeastern Conference
AP final
Unranked peak No. 7
Points
435–⁠332
Coach
Lane Kiffin
Elo
1575 −25 this season
SP+ rating
16.2 No. 14 of 131; offense No. 17, defense No. 44, special teams No. 25
SRS
9.7 No. 26 of 131 in FBS
Returning
3% of last season’s EPA, No. 130 of 130
Recruiting class
No. 23 roster talent No. 23 in FBS
Offensive coordinators
John David Baker and Charlie Weis Jr.
Defensive coordinators
Maurice Crum Jr. and Chris Partridge
Offense
Veer and shoot
Defense
Multiple

How good, play by play

  • Offense35th of 131
  • Defense62nd of 131
  • Offense, opponent-adjusted17th of 131
  • Defense, opponent-adjusted62nd of 131
EPA per playSuccessExplosivenessFBS rank
Offense0.1748%1.2335th of 131
Defense0.1144%1.1962nd of 131
Opponent-adjusted0.20 off
0.09 def
50% off
43% def
—17th off
62nd def
How these are measured

Play-weighted averages over games against FBS opponents; raw numbers, not adjusted for the strength of the opponent. EPA (expected points added) measures how much each play changed the expected score; success rate counts plays that kept the offense on schedule; explosiveness is the average EPA on successful plays. Lower is better on defense. Ranked by EPA per play among teams that were FBS that season. The opponent-adjusted row (offense / defense) is CollegeFootballData.com’s WEPA, which accounts for who each team played.

Drives and havoc

Points per trip inside the 40Average startHavoc
Offense4.0own 2716% allowed
Defense3.7own 3016% caused

CORE rating 9.2, 26th of 131 (offense 8.7, defense -0.5).

A trip inside the 40 is a drive that reaches the opponent’s 40-yard line; points per trip is how many it scored on average (allowed, on defense). Average start is where drives began (the defense’s line is where its opponents started). Havoc is the share of plays ending in a tackle for loss, a forced fumble, an interception or a pass broken up. CORE is CollegeFootballData.com’s context- and opponent-adjusted rating (points better than an average team; lower is better on defense). From CollegeFootballData.com.

Leaders

Passing yardsJaxson Dart QB2,975 yds
Passing touchdownsJaxson Dart QB20 TD
Rushing yardsQuinshon Judkins RB1,567 yds
Rushing touchdownsQuinshon Judkins RB16 TD
Receiving yardsMalik Heath WR971 yds
Receiving touchdownsJonathan Mingo WR5 TD
TacklesTroy Brown LB91 tkl
SacksTavius Robinson DE5 sacks
InterceptionsA.J. Finley S2 INT

Top recruits in the 2022 class

Zxavian Harris DL★★★★No. 136
Davison Igbinosun CB★★★★No. 162
Jaron Willis DE★★★★No. 189
Taylor Groves S★★★★No. 277
Jeremiah Dillon WR★★★★No. 311
Nick Cull CB★★★★No. 384

247Sports composite rankings via CollegeFootballData.com; national rank in the class.

The 2022 class by position

SignedStarsRating
Quarterbacks23.00.836
Running backs13.00.880
Receivers33.30.880
Offensive line43.00.872
Defensive line24.00.935
Linebackers13.00.856
Defensive backs43.80.906
Athletes and specialists13.00.865
Whole class183.30.883

High-school signees by position group, with their average stars and 247Sports composite rating (out of 1), via CollegeFootballData.com. Athletes are signees with no set position.

Drafted in 2023

The 2023 draft
Rd 2Jonathan Mingo WRCarolina Panthers
Rd 4Tavius Robinson OLBBaltimore Ravens
Rd 6Zach Evans RBLos Angeles Rams
Rd 7Nick Broeker OGBuffalo Bills

Roster 132

The 2022 roster

132 players, with numbers, heights, hometowns and each player’s 2022 line; 62 have a stat line. See the roster

Transfers in 17

The 2022 portal

And 5 more, lower-rated or unrated.

Transfers out 23

And 11 more, lower-rated or unrated.

All-SEC

1 first team, 2 second team

First team

Second team

From Wikipedia’s 2022 all-conference team article, with the selectors that named each player (AP-1: the Associated Press’s first team).

2022 Southeastern Conference standings

Conference page
TeamConf.OverallAP final
Georgia8–⁠015–⁠01
Tennessee6–⁠211–⁠26
Alabama6–⁠211–⁠25
LSU6–⁠210–⁠416
Mississippi State4–⁠49–⁠420
Ole Miss4–⁠48–⁠5
South Carolina4–⁠48–⁠523
Arkansas3–⁠57–⁠6
Kentucky3–⁠57–⁠6
Florida3–⁠56–⁠7
Missouri3–⁠56–⁠7
Vanderbilt2–⁠65–⁠7
Texas A&M2–⁠65–⁠7
Auburn2–⁠65–⁠7

Ordered by conference winning percentage, then conference wins. Division splits and tiebreakers aren’t applied.