2013 New Mexico

3–⁠9 (1–⁠7 Mountain West Conference), coached by Bob Davie.

Schedule and results

New Mexico in 2013, game by game: lost vs. UTSA 13–21; won at UTEP 42–35; lost at Pittsburgh 27–49; lost vs. UNLV 42–56; won vs. New Mexico State 66–17; lost at Wyoming 31–38; lost vs. Utah State 10–45; lost at San Diego State 30–35; won vs. Air Force 45–37; lost vs. Colorado State 42–66; lost at No. 15 Fresno State 28–69; lost at Boise State 17–45+49−41Lost 13–21 vs. UTSA-8UTSAWon 42–35 at UTEP+7UTEPLost 27–49 at Pittsburgh-22PittsburghLost 42–56 vs. UNLV-14UNLVWon 66–17 vs. New Mexico State+49New Mexico StateLost 31–38 at Wyoming-7WyomingLost 10–45 vs. Utah State-35Utah StateLost 30–35 at San Diego State-5San Diego StateWon 45–37 vs. Air Force+8Air ForceLost 42–66 vs. Colorado State-24Colorado StateLost 28–69 at No. 15 Fresno State-41No. 15 Fresno StateLost 17–45 at Boise State-28Boise State
Each game’s margin, wins above the line and losses below.

Elo: a pregame chance from scores alone.

How it ended: Lost to Boise State 45–⁠17; unranked in the final AP poll; 10th in the Mountain West Conference.

In program history: The 94th-best season in program history by end-of-season Elo (of 109 on file).

Record
3–⁠9
Conference
1–⁠7 10th in Mountain West Conference
AP final
Unranked
Points
393–⁠513
Coach
Bob Davie
Elo
1298 −68 this season
SP+ rating
-14.9 No. 101 of 125; offense No. 54, defense No. 121, special teams No. 60
SRS
−15.8 No. 111 of 125 in FBS
Recruiting class
No. 93
Offensive coordinator
Bob DeBesse
Defensive coordinator
Jeff Mills
Offense
Multiple pistol
Defense
3–⁠4

How good, play by play

  • Offense21st of 125
  • Defense123rd of 125
  • Offense, opponent-adjusted35th of 125
  • Defense, opponent-adjusted132nd of 125
EPA per playSuccessExplosivenessFBS rank
Offense0.1443%1.0721st of 125
Defense0.2249%0.99123rd of 125
Opponent-adjusted0.11 off
0.18 def
43% off
49% def
—35th off
132nd def
How these are measured

Play-weighted averages over games against FBS opponents; raw numbers, not adjusted for the strength of the opponent. EPA (expected points added) measures how much each play changed the expected score; success rate counts plays that kept the offense on schedule; explosiveness is the average EPA on successful plays. Lower is better on defense. Ranked by EPA per play among teams that were FBS that season. The opponent-adjusted row (offense / defense) is CollegeFootballData.com’s WEPA, which accounts for who each team played.

Drives and havoc

Points per trip inside the 40Average startHavoc
Offense-0.1own 30— allowed
Defense-0.1own 29— caused

A trip inside the 40 is a drive that reaches the opponent’s 40-yard line; points per trip is how many it scored on average (allowed, on defense). Average start is where drives began (the defense’s line is where its opponents started). Havoc is the share of plays ending in a tackle for loss, a forced fumble, an interception or a pass broken up. From CollegeFootballData.com.

Leaders

Passing yardsClayton Mitchem QB661 yds
Passing touchdownsCole Gautsche TE7 TD
Rushing yardsKasey Carrier RB1,122 yds
Rushing touchdownsKasey Carrier RB9 TD
Receiving yardsJeric Magnant WR294 yds
Receiving touchdownsCarlos Wiggins WR2 TD
InterceptionsDallas Bollema LB1 INT

Top recruits in the 2013 class

Isaiah Brown CB★★★No. 1184
Romell Jordan APB★★★No. 1469
Donnie White WDE★★★No. 1500
Teriyon Gipson ATH★★★No. 1671
William Udeh SDE★★★No. 1671

247Sports composite rankings via CollegeFootballData.com; national rank in the class.

The 2013 class by position

SignedStarsRating
Quarterbacks13.00.798
Running backs13.00.818
Receivers32.30.774
Offensive line12.00.762
Defensive line42.50.796
Linebackers42.50.785
Defensive backs32.30.782
Athletes and specialists22.50.790
Whole class192.50.787

High-school signees by position group, with their average stars and 247Sports composite rating (out of 1), via CollegeFootballData.com. Athletes are signees with no set position.

Roster 115

The 2013 roster

115 players, with numbers, heights, hometowns and each player’s 2013 line; 30 have a stat line. See the roster

2013 Mountain West Conference standings

Conference page
TeamConf.OverallAP final
Fresno State7–⁠111–⁠2
Utah State7–⁠19–⁠5
Boise State6–⁠28–⁠5
San Diego State6–⁠28–⁠5
Colorado State5–⁠38–⁠6
UNLV5–⁠37–⁠6
San José State5–⁠36–⁠6
Wyoming3–⁠55–⁠7
Nevada3–⁠54–⁠8
New Mexico1–⁠73–⁠9
Air Force0–⁠82–⁠10
Hawai’i0–⁠81–⁠11

Ordered by conference winning percentage, then conference wins. Division splits and tiebreakers aren’t applied.