2013 Hawai’i

1–⁠11 (0–⁠8 Mountain West Conference), coached by Norm Chow.

Schedule and results

Hawai’i in 2013, game by game: lost vs. No. 24 USC 13–30; lost at Oregon State 14–33; lost at Nevada 9–31; lost vs. No. 25 Fresno State 37–42; lost vs. San José State 27–37; lost at UNLV 37–39; lost vs. Colorado State 28–35; lost at Utah State 10–47; lost at Navy 28–42; lost vs. San Diego State 21–28; lost at Wyoming 56–59; won vs. Army 49–42+7−37Lost 13–30 vs. No. 24 USC-17No. 24 USCLost 14–33 at Oregon State-19Oregon StateLost 9–31 at Nevada-22NevadaLost 37–42 vs. No. 25 Fresno State-5No. 25 Fresno StateLost 27–37 vs. San José State-10San José StateLost 37–39 at UNLV-2UNLVLost 28–35 vs. Colorado State-7Colorado StateLost 10–47 at Utah State-37Utah StateLost 28–42 at Navy-14NavyLost 21–28 vs. San Diego State-7San Diego StateLost 56–59 at Wyoming-3WyomingWon 49–42 vs. Army+7Army
Each game’s margin, wins above the line and losses below.

Elo: a pregame chance from scores alone.

How it ended: Beat Army 49–⁠42; unranked in the final AP poll; tied for 11th in the Mountain West Conference.

In program history: The 50th-best season in program history by end-of-season Elo (of 97 on file).

Record
1–⁠11
Conference
0–⁠8 tied for 11th in Mountain West Conference
AP final
Unranked
Points
329–⁠465
Coach
Norm Chow
Elo
1289 −110 this season
SP+ rating
-14.3 No. 99 of 125; offense No. 92, defense No. 98, special teams No. 116
SRS
−11.7 No. 101 of 125 in FBS
Recruiting class
No. 78
Defensive coordinator
Thom Kaumeyer
Offense
Pro-style
Defense
4–⁠3

How good, play by play

  • Offense105th of 125
  • Defense74th of 125
  • Offense, opponent-adjusted122nd of 125
  • Defense, opponent-adjusted67th of 125
EPA per playSuccessExplosivenessFBS rank
Offense0.0239%0.95105th of 125
Defense0.0941%1.0974th of 125
Opponent-adjusted0.03 off
0.09 def
40% off
41% def
—122nd off
67th def
How these are measured

Play-weighted averages over games against FBS opponents; raw numbers, not adjusted for the strength of the opponent. EPA (expected points added) measures how much each play changed the expected score; success rate counts plays that kept the offense on schedule; explosiveness is the average EPA on successful plays. Lower is better on defense. Ranked by EPA per play among teams that were FBS that season. The opponent-adjusted row (offense / defense) is CollegeFootballData.com’s WEPA, which accounts for who each team played.

Drives and havoc

Points per trip inside the 40Average startHavoc
Offense-0.2own 314% allowed
Defense-0.1own 302% caused

A trip inside the 40 is a drive that reaches the opponent’s 40-yard line; points per trip is how many it scored on average (allowed, on defense). Average start is where drives began (the defense’s line is where its opponents started). Havoc is the share of plays ending in a tackle for loss, a forced fumble, an interception or a pass broken up. From CollegeFootballData.com.

Leaders

Passing yardsSean Schroeder QB2,960 yds
Passing touchdownsSean Schroeder QB28 TD
Rushing yardsJoey Iosefa RB590 yds
Rushing touchdownsJoey Iosefa RB5 TD
Receiving yardsChris Gant WR973 yds
Receiving touchdownsChris Gant WR9 TD
InterceptionsTrayvon Henderson DB3 INT

Top recruits in the 2013 class

Kennedy Tulimasealii DT★★★No. 1031
Kwamane Bowens WR★★★No. 1081
Jonah Moi OLB★★★No. 1102
Ammon Barker WR★★★No. 1375
Elijah Tupai OG★★★No. 1485

247Sports composite rankings via CollegeFootballData.com; national rank in the class.

The 2013 class by position

SignedStarsRating
Quarterbacks12.00.792
Running backs23.00.806
Receivers42.50.802
Offensive line22.50.801
Defensive line22.50.815
Linebackers52.20.781
Defensive backs22.50.796
Whole class182.40.797

High-school signees by position group, with their average stars and 247Sports composite rating (out of 1), via CollegeFootballData.com. Athletes are signees with no set position.

Roster 110

The 2013 roster

110 players, with numbers, heights, hometowns and each player’s 2013 line; 33 have a stat line. See the roster

2013 Mountain West Conference standings

Conference page
TeamConf.OverallAP final
Fresno State7–⁠111–⁠2
Utah State7–⁠19–⁠5
Boise State6–⁠28–⁠5
San Diego State6–⁠28–⁠5
Colorado State5–⁠38–⁠6
UNLV5–⁠37–⁠6
San José State5–⁠36–⁠6
Wyoming3–⁠55–⁠7
Nevada3–⁠54–⁠8
New Mexico1–⁠73–⁠9
Air Force0–⁠82–⁠10
Hawai’i0–⁠81–⁠11

Ordered by conference winning percentage, then conference wins. Division splits and tiebreakers aren’t applied.