2025 Miami (OH)

7–⁠7 (6–⁠2 Mid-American Conference), coached by Chuck Martin.

Schedule and results

Miami (OH) in 2025, game by game: lost at Wisconsin 0–17; lost at Rutgers 17–45; lost vs. UNLV 38–41; won vs. Lindenwood 38–0; won at Northern Illinois 25–14; won at Akron 20–7; won vs. Eastern Michigan 44–30; won vs. Western Michigan 26–17; lost at Ohio 20–24; lost vs. Toledo 3–24; won at Buffalo 37–20; won vs. Ball State 45–24; lost vs. Western Michigan 13–23; lost vs. Fresno State 3–18+38−28Lost 0–17 at Wisconsin-17WisconsinLost 17–45 at Rutgers-28RutgersLost 38–41 vs. UNLV-3UNLVWon 38–0 vs. Lindenwood+38LindenwoodWon 25–14 at Northern Illinois+11Northern Illino…Won 20–7 at Akron+13AkronWon 44–30 vs. Eastern Michigan+14Eastern MichiganWon 26–17 vs. Western Michigan+9Western MichiganLost 20–24 at Ohio-4OhioLost 3–24 vs. Toledo-21ToledoWon 37–20 at Buffalo+17BuffaloWon 45–24 vs. Ball State+21Ball StateLost 13–23 vs. Western Michigan-10Western MichiganLost 3–18 vs. Fresno State-15Fresno State
Each game’s margin, wins above the line and losses below.
DateOpponentResultElo
Aug 28atWisconsinL 0–⁠1754%
Sep 6atRutgersL 17–⁠4544%
Sep 20vsUNLVL 38–⁠4142%
Sep 27vsLindenwoodW 38–⁠084%
Oct 4atNorthern IllinoisW 25–⁠1451%
Oct 11atAkronW 20–⁠765%
Oct 18vsEastern MichiganW 44–⁠3080%
Oct 25vsWestern MichiganW 26–⁠1769%
Nov 4atOhioL 20–⁠2439%
Nov 12vsToledoL 3–⁠2464%
Nov 19atBuffaloW 37–⁠2051%
Nov 29vsBall StateW 45–⁠2483%
Dec 6vsWestern MichiganMAC ChampionshipL 13–⁠2353%
Dec 27vsFresno StateArizona BowlL 3–⁠1850%

Elo: a pregame chance from scores alone.

How it ended: Lost to Fresno State 18–⁠3 in the Arizona Bowl; unranked in the final AP poll; tied for 2nd in the Mid-American Conference.

In program history: The 41st-best season in program history by end-of-season Elo (of 96 on file).

Record
7–⁠7
Conference
6–⁠2 tied for 2nd in Mid-American Conference
AP final
Unranked
Points
329–⁠304
Coach
Chuck Martin
Elo
1510 −67 this season
SP+ rating
-3.4 No. 82 of 136; offense No. 114, defense No. 54, special teams No. 16
SRS
−5.6 No. 92 of 136 in FBS
Returning
8% of last season’s EPA, No. 129 of 134
Recruiting class
No. 83 roster talent No. 87 in FBS
Offensive coordinator
Pat Welsh
Defensive coordinator
Bill Brechin
Offense
Multiple
Defense
Multiple

How good, play by play

  • Offense100th of 136
  • Defense50th of 136
  • Offense, opponent-adjusted110th of 136
  • Defense, opponent-adjusted67th of 136
EPA per playSuccessExplosivenessFBS rank
Offense0.0239%1.21100th of 136
Defense0.0640%1.2450th of 136
Opponent-adjusted0.01 off
0.10 def
37% off
43% def
—110th off
67th def

Passing and running

Pass successDepth of targetDeep throwsLine yardsStuffed
Offense39%13.3 yds27%3.3014%
Defense43%9.1 yds15%2.9017%
How these are measured

Play-weighted averages over games against FBS opponents; raw numbers, not adjusted for the strength of the opponent. EPA (expected points added) measures how much each play changed the expected score; success rate counts plays that kept the offense on schedule; explosiveness is the average EPA on successful plays. Lower is better on defense. Ranked by EPA per play among teams that were FBS that season. The opponent-adjusted row (offense / defense) is CollegeFootballData.com’s WEPA, which accounts for who each team played. Passing and running: depth of target is how far downfield passes traveled in the air; deep throws are the share thrown deep, of the passes whose depth and direction the play-by-play describes (about half); line yards are the running yards per carry credited to the blockers; stuffed is the share of carries stopped at or behind the line. The defense’s line is what its opponents did. From CollegeFootballData.com, 2025 on.

Drives and havoc

Points per trip inside the 40Average startHavoc
Offense3.3own 3113% allowed
Defense3.4own 2818% caused

CORE rating -6.5, 87th of 136 (offense -7.3, defense -0.9).

A trip inside the 40 is a drive that reaches the opponent’s 40-yard line; points per trip is how many it scored on average (allowed, on defense). Average start is where drives began (the defense’s line is where its opponents started). Havoc is the share of plays ending in a tackle for loss, a forced fumble, an interception or a pass broken up. CORE is CollegeFootballData.com’s context- and opponent-adjusted rating (points better than an average team; lower is better on defense). From CollegeFootballData.com.

Leaders

Passing yardsDequan Finn QB1,451 yds
Passing touchdownsDequan Finn QB9 TD
Rushing yardsJordan Brunson RB767 yds
Rushing touchdownsD’Shawntae Jones RB7 TD
Receiving yardsKamryn Perry WR976 yds
Receiving touchdownsKamryn Perry WR6 TD
TacklesEli Blakey DB118 tkl
SacksAdam Trick LB8 sacks
InterceptionsCorban Hondru LB3 INT

Top recruits in the 2025 class

Adrian Walker Jr. ATH★★★No. 1315
Anthony Ludington DE★★★No. 1629
Noah Ehrlich QB★★★No. 1734
Carmine Orozco DL★★★No. 1857
Aariz Taylor DE★★★No. 1937

247Sports composite rankings via CollegeFootballData.com; national rank in the class.

The 2025 class by position

SignedStarsRating
Quarterbacks13.00.850
Receivers43.00.836
Offensive line43.00.823
Defensive line63.00.843
Linebackers13.00.825
Defensive backs43.00.833
Athletes and specialists13.00.861
Whole class213.00.836

High-school signees by position group, with their average stars and 247Sports composite rating (out of 1), via CollegeFootballData.com. Athletes are signees with no set position.

Drafted in 2026

The 2026 draft
Rd 7Jackson Kuwatch LBCarolina Panthers

Roster 112

The 2025 roster

112 players, with numbers, heights, hometowns and each player’s 2025 line; 57 have a stat line. See the roster

2025 Mid-American Conference standings

Conference page
TeamConf.OverallAP final
Western Michigan7–⁠110–⁠4
Ohio6–⁠29–⁠4
Toledo6–⁠28–⁠5
Miami (OH)6–⁠27–⁠7
Central Michigan5–⁠37–⁠6
Kent State4–⁠45–⁠7
Akron4–⁠45–⁠7
Buffalo4–⁠45–⁠7
Eastern Michigan3–⁠54–⁠8
Ball State3–⁠54–⁠8
Bowling Green2–⁠64–⁠8
Northern Illinois2–⁠63–⁠9
Massachusetts0–⁠80–⁠12

Ordered by conference winning percentage, then conference wins. Division splits and tiebreakers aren’t applied.