2025 Kent State

5–⁠7 (4–⁠4 Mid-American Conference), coached by Mark Carney.

Schedule and results

Kent State in 2025, game by game: won vs. Merrimack 21–17; lost at No. 24 Texas Tech 14–62; lost vs. Buffalo 28–31; lost at No. 7 Florida State 10–66; lost at No. 5 Oklahoma 0–44; won vs. Massachusetts 42–6; lost at Toledo 10–45; won vs. Bowling Green 24–21; lost at Ball State 13–17; won at Akron 42–35; lost vs. Central Michigan 16–28; won at Northern Illinois 35–31+36−56Won 21–17 vs. Merrimack+4MerrimackLost 14–62 at No. 24 Texas Tech-48No. 24 Texas TechLost 28–31 vs. Buffalo-3BuffaloLost 10–66 at No. 7 Florida State-56No. 7 Florida StateLost 0–44 at No. 5 Oklahoma-44No. 5 OklahomaWon 42–6 vs. Massachusetts+36MassachusettsLost 10–45 at Toledo-35ToledoWon 24–21 vs. Bowling Green+3Bowling GreenLost 13–17 at Ball State-4Ball StateWon 42–35 at Akron+7AkronLost 16–28 vs. Central Michigan-12Central MichiganWon 35–31 at Northern Illinois+4Northern Illino…
Each game’s margin, wins above the line and losses below.

Elo: a pregame chance from scores alone.

How it ended: Beat Northern Illinois 35–⁠31; unranked in the final AP poll; tied for 6th in the Mid-American Conference.

In program history: The 39th-best season in program history by end-of-season Elo (of 68 on file).

Record
5–⁠7
Conference
4–⁠4 tied for 6th in Mid-American Conference
AP final
Unranked
Points
255–⁠403
Coach
Mark Carney
Elo
1331 +41 this season
SP+ rating
-19.3 No. 130 of 136; offense No. 125, defense No. 120, special teams No. 117
SRS
−16.1 No. 125 of 136 in FBS
Returning
11% of last season’s EPA, No. 123 of 134
Recruiting class
No. 93 roster talent No. 128 in FBS
Offensive coordinator
Clay Patterson
Defensive coordinator
Cherokee Valeria
Offense
Spread option
Defense
4–⁠3

How good, play by play

  • Offense120th of 136
  • Defense88th of 136
  • Offense, opponent-adjusted114th of 136
  • Defense, opponent-adjusted126th of 136
EPA per playSuccessExplosivenessFBS rank
Offense-0.0435%1.37120th of 136
Defense0.1545%1.2688th of 136
Opponent-adjusted-0.00 off
0.20 def
35% off
49% def
—114th off
126th def

Passing and running

Pass successDepth of targetDeep throwsLine yardsStuffed
Offense39%11.3 yds20%2.4022%
Defense46%9.9 yds14%3.2015%
How these are measured

Play-weighted averages over games against FBS opponents; raw numbers, not adjusted for the strength of the opponent. EPA (expected points added) measures how much each play changed the expected score; success rate counts plays that kept the offense on schedule; explosiveness is the average EPA on successful plays. Lower is better on defense. Ranked by EPA per play among teams that were FBS that season. The opponent-adjusted row (offense / defense) is CollegeFootballData.com’s WEPA, which accounts for who each team played. Passing and running: depth of target is how far downfield passes traveled in the air; deep throws are the share thrown deep, of the passes whose depth and direction the play-by-play describes (about half); line yards are the running yards per carry credited to the blockers; stuffed is the share of carries stopped at or behind the line. The defense’s line is what its opponents did. From CollegeFootballData.com, 2025 on.

Drives and havoc

Points per trip inside the 40Average startHavoc
Offense3.4own 2818% allowed
Defense4.3own 3214% caused

CORE rating -21.9, 130th of 136 (offense -8.3, defense 13.6).

A trip inside the 40 is a drive that reaches the opponent’s 40-yard line; points per trip is how many it scored on average (allowed, on defense). Average start is where drives began (the defense’s line is where its opponents started). Havoc is the share of plays ending in a tackle for loss, a forced fumble, an interception or a pass broken up. CORE is CollegeFootballData.com’s context- and opponent-adjusted rating (points better than an average team; lower is better on defense). From CollegeFootballData.com.

Leaders

Passing yardsDru Deshields QB2,030 yds
Passing touchdownsDru Deshields QB18 TD
Rushing yardsGavin Garcia RB647 yds
Rushing touchdownsDru Deshields QB3 TD
Receiving yardsCade Wolford WR509 yds
Receiving touchdownsCade Wolford WR7 TD
TacklesMason Woods LB94 tkl
SacksJamond Mathis LB6 sacks
InterceptionsTerrell Miller CB2 INT

Top recruits in the 2025 class

TaRyan Martin RB★★★No. 1315
Maurice Stephens WR★★★No. 1477
Deante Ruffin QB★★★No. 1728
Joel Cordoba S★★★No. 2057
Teaunn Hunter WR★★★No. 2272

247Sports composite rankings via CollegeFootballData.com; national rank in the class.

The 2025 class by position

SignedStarsRating
Quarterbacks23.00.839
Running backs23.00.845
Receivers52.80.822
Offensive line32.70.803
Defensive line33.00.831
Linebackers33.00.823
Defensive backs23.00.835
Athletes and specialists23.00.816
Whole class222.90.825

High-school signees by position group, with their average stars and 247Sports composite rating (out of 1), via CollegeFootballData.com. Athletes are signees with no set position.

Roster 104

The 2025 roster

104 players, with numbers, heights, hometowns and each player’s 2025 line; 65 have a stat line. See the roster

2025 Mid-American Conference standings

Conference page
TeamConf.OverallAP final
Western Michigan7–⁠110–⁠4
Ohio6–⁠29–⁠4
Toledo6–⁠28–⁠5
Miami (OH)6–⁠27–⁠7
Central Michigan5–⁠37–⁠6
Kent State4–⁠45–⁠7
Akron4–⁠45–⁠7
Buffalo4–⁠45–⁠7
Eastern Michigan3–⁠54–⁠8
Ball State3–⁠54–⁠8
Bowling Green2–⁠64–⁠8
Northern Illinois2–⁠63–⁠9
Massachusetts0–⁠80–⁠12

Ordered by conference winning percentage, then conference wins. Division splits and tiebreakers aren’t applied.