2026 Duke

4–⁠2 (1–⁠2 Atlantic Coast Conference), coached by Manny Diaz. The season’s Wikipedia article records 4–⁠1, over five games to the six on file here.

Schedule and results

Duke in 2026, game by game: won vs. Tulane 17–3; won at Illinois 31–27; won vs. Stanford 35–7; won vs. William & Mary 62–7; lost at Georgia Tech 25–28; lost vs. North Carolina 20–24+55−4Won 17–3 vs. Tulane+14TulaneWon 31–27 at Illinois+4IllinoisWon 35–7 vs. Stanford+28StanfordWon 62–7 vs. William & Mary+55William & MaryLost 25–28 at Georgia Tech-3Georgia TechLost 20–24 vs. North Carolina-4North Carolina
Each game’s margin, wins above the line and losses below.
DateOpponentResultElo
Sep 5vsTulaneW 17–⁠356%
Sep 12atIllinoisW 31–⁠2746%
Sep 19vsStanfordW 35–⁠780%
Sep 26vsWilliam & MaryW 62–⁠791%
Oct 10atGeorgia TechL 25–⁠2863%
Oct 17vsNorth CarolinaL 20–⁠2475%
Oct 23atVirginiaPreview51%
Oct 31vsBoston CollegePreview77%
Nov 7atNC StatePreview52%
Nov 14atMiamiPreview22%
Nov 20vsClemsonPreview60%
Nov 28atWake ForestPreview37%

Elo: a pregame chance from scores alone.

Record
4–⁠2
Conference
1–⁠2 tied for 11th in Atlantic Coast Conference
AP now
Unranked
Points
190–⁠96
Coach
Manny Diaz
Elo
1602 +14 this season
SP+ rating
8.2 No. 45 of 138; offense No. 41, defense No. 50, special teams No. 45
SRS
6.6 No. 43 of 138 in FBS
Returning
17% of last season’s EPA, No. 103 of 136
Recruiting class
No. 71 roster talent No. 69 in FBS
Offensive coordinator
Jonathan Brewer
Defensive coordinator
Jonathan Patke

How good, play by play

  • Offense36th of 138
  • Defense50th of 138
  • Offense, opponent-adjusted56th of 138
  • Defense, opponent-adjusted43rd of 138
EPA per playSuccessExplosivenessFBS rank
Offense0.1941%1.2836th of 138
Defense0.0542%1.0850th of 138
Opponent-adjusted0.11 off
0.06 def
40% off
42% def
—56th off
43rd def

Passing and running

Pass successDepth of targetDeep throwsLine yardsStuffed
Offense45%7.7 yds15%3.3013%
Defense46%7.0 yds7%2.7016%
How these are measured

Play-weighted averages over games against FBS opponents; raw numbers, not adjusted for the strength of the opponent. EPA (expected points added) measures how much each play changed the expected score; success rate counts plays that kept the offense on schedule; explosiveness is the average EPA on successful plays. Lower is better on defense. Ranked by EPA per play among teams that were FBS that season. The opponent-adjusted row (offense / defense) is CollegeFootballData.com’s WEPA, which accounts for who each team played. Passing and running: depth of target is how far downfield passes traveled in the air; deep throws are the share thrown deep, of the passes whose depth and direction the play-by-play describes (about half); line yards are the running yards per carry credited to the blockers; stuffed is the share of carries stopped at or behind the line. The defense’s line is what its opponents did. From CollegeFootballData.com, 2025 on.

Drives and havoc

Points per trip inside the 40Average startHavoc
Offense4.3own 3110% allowed
Defense3.1own 2516% caused

CORE rating 8.8, 31st of 138 (offense 1.8, defense -7.0).

A trip inside the 40 is a drive that reaches the opponent’s 40-yard line; points per trip is how many it scored on average (allowed, on defense). Average start is where drives began (the defense’s line is where its opponents started). Havoc is the share of plays ending in a tackle for loss, a forced fumble, an interception or a pass broken up. CORE is CollegeFootballData.com’s context- and opponent-adjusted rating (points better than an average team; lower is better on defense). From CollegeFootballData.com.

Leaders

Passing yardsWalker Eget QB1,229 yds
Passing touchdownsWalker Eget QB8 TD
Rushing yardsNate Sheppard RB820 yds
Rushing touchdownsNate Sheppard RB8 TD
Receiving yardsNate Sheppard RB259 yds
Receiving touchdownsNate Sheppard RB4 TD
TacklesAndrew Pellicciotta S33 tkl
SacksBradley Gompers LB3 sacks
InterceptionsEvan Smith CB1 INT

Top recruits in the 2026 class

Sean Stover OL★★★★No. 347
Obinna Umeh DE★★★★No. 353
C.J. Givers RB★★★No. 586
Terry Walker III QB★★★No. 608
Lyrik Pettis S★★★No. 731

247Sports composite rankings via CollegeFootballData.com; national rank in the class.

The 2026 class by position

SignedStarsRating
Quarterbacks13.00.884
Running backs23.00.877
Receivers33.00.872
Offensive line14.00.901
Defensive line33.30.885
Linebackers13.00.868
Defensive backs23.00.876
Athletes and specialists23.00.841
Whole class153.10.874

High-school signees by position group, with their average stars and 247Sports composite rating (out of 1), via CollegeFootballData.com. Athletes are signees with no set position.

Roster 102

The 2026 roster

102 players, with numbers, heights, hometowns and each player’s 2026 line; 63 have a stat line. See the roster

2026 Atlantic Coast Conference standings

Conference page
TeamConf.OverallAP final
Miami4–⁠06–⁠0
Wake Forest4–⁠16–⁠1
SMU3–⁠15–⁠1
North Carolina2–⁠14–⁠2
Clemson2–⁠14–⁠2
Louisville3–⁠24–⁠3
Virginia Tech2–⁠25–⁠2
Pittsburgh2–⁠25–⁠2
Virginia2–⁠24–⁠3
California2–⁠23–⁠4
Duke1–⁠24–⁠2
NC State1–⁠23–⁠3
Boston College1–⁠23–⁠3
Georgia Tech1–⁠22–⁠4
Florida State1–⁠33–⁠4
Stanford1–⁠33–⁠4
Syracuse0–⁠42–⁠4

Ordered by conference winning percentage, then conference wins. Division splits and tiebreakers aren’t applied.