2026 California

3–⁠4 (2–⁠2 Atlantic Coast Conference), coached by Tosh Lupoi. The season’s Wikipedia article records 3–⁠3, over six games to the seven on file here.

Schedule and results

California in 2026, game by game: lost vs. UCLA 24–45; won at Syracuse 21–18; won vs. Wagner 49–7; lost vs. Clemson 10–24; lost at UNLV 31–39; won vs. Virginia Tech 25–20; lost vs. No. 21 Wake Forest 7–41+42−34Lost 24–45 vs. UCLA-21UCLAWon 21–18 at Syracuse+3SyracuseWon 49–7 vs. Wagner+42WagnerLost 10–24 vs. Clemson-14ClemsonLost 31–39 at UNLV-8UNLVWon 25–20 vs. Virginia Tech+5Virginia TechLost 7–41 vs. No. 21 Wake Forest-34No. 21 Wake Forest
Each game’s margin, wins above the line and losses below.
DateOpponentResultElo
Sep 5vsUCLAL 24–⁠4562%
Sep 12atSyracuseW 21–⁠1841%
Sep 19vsWagnerW 49–⁠786%
Sep 25vsClemsonL 10–⁠2442%
Oct 3atUNLVL 31–⁠3927%
Oct 10vsVirginia TechW 25–⁠2046%
Oct 17vs21Wake ForestL 7–⁠4135%
Oct 24atSMUPreview16%
Oct 31atNC StatePreview29%
Nov 14atVirginiaPreview28%
Nov 21vsStanfordPreview56%
Nov 28vsPittsburghPreview40%

Elo: a pregame chance from scores alone.

Record
3–⁠4
Conference
2–⁠2 tied for 7th in Atlantic Coast Conference
AP now
Unranked
Points
167–⁠194
Coach
Tosh Lupoi
Elo
1430 −51 this season
SP+ rating
-2.5 No. 87 of 138; offense No. 90, defense No. 76, special teams No. 123
SRS
−4.0 No. 86 of 138 in FBS
Returning
58% of last season’s EPA, No. 43 of 136
Recruiting class
No. 56 roster talent No. 33 in FBS
Offensive coordinators
Jordan Somerville and Ike Hilliard
Defensive coordinators
Michael Hutchings and Da’Von Brown
Offense
Pro-style
Defense
Multiple 3–⁠4

How good, play by play

  • Offense131st of 138
  • Defense97th of 138
  • Offense, opponent-adjusted123rd of 138
  • Defense, opponent-adjusted72nd of 138
EPA per playSuccessExplosivenessFBS rank
Offense-0.1035%1.22131st of 138
Defense0.1740%1.4797th of 138
Opponent-adjusted0.01 off
0.11 def
38% off
39% def
—123rd off
72nd def

Passing and running

Pass successDepth of targetDeep throwsLine yardsStuffed
Offense40%6.3 yds9%2.5021%
Defense39%8.2 yds16%3.1014%
How these are measured

Play-weighted averages over games against FBS opponents; raw numbers, not adjusted for the strength of the opponent. EPA (expected points added) measures how much each play changed the expected score; success rate counts plays that kept the offense on schedule; explosiveness is the average EPA on successful plays. Lower is better on defense. Ranked by EPA per play among teams that were FBS that season. The opponent-adjusted row (offense / defense) is CollegeFootballData.com’s WEPA, which accounts for who each team played. Passing and running: depth of target is how far downfield passes traveled in the air; deep throws are the share thrown deep, of the passes whose depth and direction the play-by-play describes (about half); line yards are the running yards per carry credited to the blockers; stuffed is the share of carries stopped at or behind the line. The defense’s line is what its opponents did. From CollegeFootballData.com, 2025 on.

Drives and havoc

Points per trip inside the 40Average startHavoc
Offense2.6own 2718% allowed
Defense3.5own 3113% caused

CORE rating -11.0, 108th of 138 (offense -9.2, defense 1.7).

A trip inside the 40 is a drive that reaches the opponent’s 40-yard line; points per trip is how many it scored on average (allowed, on defense). Average start is where drives began (the defense’s line is where its opponents started). Havoc is the share of plays ending in a tackle for loss, a forced fumble, an interception or a pass broken up. CORE is CollegeFootballData.com’s context- and opponent-adjusted rating (points better than an average team; lower is better on defense). From CollegeFootballData.com.

Leaders

Passing yardsJaron-Keawe Sagapolutele QB1,290 yds
Passing touchdownsJaron-Keawe Sagapolutele QB9 TD
Rushing yardsAdam Mohammed RB336 yds
Rushing touchdownsAshten Emory RB4 TD
Receiving yardsChase Hendricks WR415 yds
Receiving touchdownsCarson Perry-Smith RB2 TD
TacklesIsaiah Crosby DB38 tkl
SacksA.J. Tuitele LB3 sacks
InterceptionsKingston Lopa DB5 INT

Top recruits in the 2026 class

Daniel McMorris OT★★★★No. 267
Taimane Purcell TE★★★★No. 357
Victor Santino RB★★★No. 527
E.J. Morgan WR★★★No. 554
Nainoa Lopes QB★★★No. 704

247Sports composite rankings via CollegeFootballData.com; national rank in the class.

The 2026 class by position

SignedStarsRating
Quarterbacks13.00.881
Running backs13.00.888
Receivers33.30.887
Offensive line53.20.876
Defensive line43.00.860
Linebackers23.00.877
Athletes and specialists23.00.868
Whole class183.10.874

High-school signees by position group, with their average stars and 247Sports composite rating (out of 1), via CollegeFootballData.com. Athletes are signees with no set position.

Roster 112

The 2026 roster

112 players, with numbers, heights, hometowns and each player’s 2026 line; 64 have a stat line. See the roster

Transfers in 32

The 2026 portal

And 20 more, lower-rated or unrated.

Transfers out 36

And 24 more, lower-rated or unrated.

2026 Atlantic Coast Conference standings

Conference page
TeamConf.OverallAP final
Miami4–⁠06–⁠0
Wake Forest4–⁠16–⁠1
SMU3–⁠15–⁠1
North Carolina2–⁠14–⁠2
Clemson2–⁠14–⁠2
Louisville3–⁠24–⁠3
Virginia Tech2–⁠25–⁠2
Pittsburgh2–⁠25–⁠2
Virginia2–⁠24–⁠3
California2–⁠23–⁠4
Duke1–⁠24–⁠2
NC State1–⁠23–⁠3
Boston College1–⁠23–⁠3
Georgia Tech1–⁠22–⁠4
Florida State1–⁠33–⁠4
Stanford1–⁠33–⁠4
Syracuse0–⁠42–⁠4

Ordered by conference winning percentage, then conference wins. Division splits and tiebreakers aren’t applied.