2026 Colorado

2–⁠4 (0–⁠3 Big 12), coached by Deion Sanders. The season’s Wikipedia article records 2–⁠3, over five games to the six on file here.

Schedule and results

Colorado in 2026, game by game: won at Georgia Tech 14–13; won vs. Weber State 52–21; lost at Northwestern 7–41; lost at Baylor 13–23; lost vs. No. 12 Texas Tech 7–29; lost vs. No. 11 Utah 24–27+31−34Won 14–13 at Georgia Tech+1Georgia TechWon 52–21 vs. Weber State+31Weber StateLost 7–41 at Northwestern-34NorthwesternLost 13–23 at Baylor-10BaylorLost 7–29 vs. No. 12 Texas Tech-22No. 12 Texas TechLost 24–27 vs. No. 11 Utah-3No. 11 Utah
Each game’s margin, wins above the line and losses below.

Elo: a pregame chance from scores alone.

Record
2–⁠4
Conference
0–⁠3 tied for 15th in Big 12
AP now
Unranked
Points
117–⁠154
Coach
Deion Sanders
Elo
1413 −33 this season
SP+ rating
-2.4 No. 84 of 138; offense No. 102, defense No. 49, special teams No. 123
SRS
−3.9 No. 85 of 138 in FBS
Returning
14% of last season’s EPA, No. 115 of 136
Recruiting class
No. 67 roster talent No. 39 in FBS
Offensive coordinator
Brennan Marion
Defensive coordinator
Chris Marve
Offense
Go-Go
Defense
4–⁠3

How good, play by play

  • Offense129th of 138
  • Defense30th of 138
  • Offense, opponent-adjusted132nd of 138
  • Defense, opponent-adjusted14th of 138
EPA per playSuccessExplosivenessFBS rank
Offense-0.0938%1.12129th of 138
Defense0.0239%1.1430th of 138
Opponent-adjusted-0.02 off
0.01 def
40% off
36% def
—132nd off
14th def

Passing and running

Pass successDepth of targetDeep throwsLine yardsStuffed
Offense43%7.9 yds11%3.1014%
Defense38%8.3 yds15%2.5027%
How these are measured

Play-weighted averages over games against FBS opponents; raw numbers, not adjusted for the strength of the opponent. EPA (expected points added) measures how much each play changed the expected score; success rate counts plays that kept the offense on schedule; explosiveness is the average EPA on successful plays. Lower is better on defense. Ranked by EPA per play among teams that were FBS that season. The opponent-adjusted row (offense / defense) is CollegeFootballData.com’s WEPA, which accounts for who each team played. Passing and running: depth of target is how far downfield passes traveled in the air; deep throws are the share thrown deep, of the passes whose depth and direction the play-by-play describes (about half); line yards are the running yards per carry credited to the blockers; stuffed is the share of carries stopped at or behind the line. The defense’s line is what its opponents did. From CollegeFootballData.com, 2025 on.

Drives and havoc

Points per trip inside the 40Average startHavoc
Offense2.3own 2616% allowed
Defense3.1own 3222% caused

CORE rating -6.3, 95th of 138 (offense -15.8, defense -9.6).

A trip inside the 40 is a drive that reaches the opponent’s 40-yard line; points per trip is how many it scored on average (allowed, on defense). Average start is where drives began (the defense’s line is where its opponents started). Havoc is the share of plays ending in a tackle for loss, a forced fumble, an interception or a pass broken up. CORE is CollegeFootballData.com’s context- and opponent-adjusted rating (points better than an average team; lower is better on defense). From CollegeFootballData.com.

Leaders

Passing yardsJulian Lewis QB733 yds
Passing touchdownsJulian Lewis QB6 TD
Rushing yardsJaquail Smith RB259 yds
Rushing touchdownsMicah Welch RB2 TD
Receiving yardsJoseph Williams WR508 yds
Receiving touchdownsJoseph Williams WR5 TD
TacklesRandon Fontenette DB50 tkl
SacksLamont Lester Jr. DL4 sacks
InterceptionsDylan Manuel DL1 INT

Top recruits in the 2026 class

Preston Ashley S★★★★No. 338
Carson Crawford LB★★★★No. 362
Alex Ward ATH★★★No. 487
Rodney Colton Jr. LB★★★No. 634
Christian Ward WR★★★No. 1066

247Sports composite rankings via CollegeFootballData.com; national rank in the class.

The 2026 class by position

SignedStarsRating
Quarterbacks13.00.870
Running backs13.00.850
Receivers23.00.853
Offensive line33.00.866
Linebackers33.30.880
Defensive backs33.30.875
Athletes and specialists13.00.890
Whole class143.10.870

High-school signees by position group, with their average stars and 247Sports composite rating (out of 1), via CollegeFootballData.com. Athletes are signees with no set position.

Roster 106

The 2026 roster

106 players, with numbers, heights, hometowns and each player’s 2026 line; 55 have a stat line. See the roster

Transfers in 42

The 2026 portal

And 30 more, lower-rated or unrated.

Transfers out 38

And 26 more, lower-rated or unrated.

2026 Big 12 standings

Conference page
TeamConf.OverallAP final
Texas Tech3–⁠06–⁠0
BYU3–⁠06–⁠0
Utah3–⁠06–⁠0
Houston3–⁠16–⁠1
Arizona2–⁠15–⁠1
Oklahoma State2–⁠14–⁠2
Baylor2–⁠14–⁠2
Cincinnati1–⁠24–⁠2
Kansas State1–⁠24–⁠2
Iowa State1–⁠23–⁠3
TCU1–⁠23–⁠3
UCF1–⁠23–⁠3
Arizona State1–⁠23–⁠3
West Virginia1–⁠34–⁠3
Kansas0–⁠32–⁠4
Colorado0–⁠32–⁠4

Ordered by conference winning percentage, then conference wins. Division splits and tiebreakers aren’t applied.