2026 Cincinnati

4–⁠2 (1–⁠2 Big 12), coached by Scott Satterfield. The season’s Wikipedia article records 4–⁠1, over five games to the six on file here.

Schedule and results

Cincinnati in 2026, game by game: won vs. Boston College 34–15; won vs. Western Carolina 62–10; won vs. Miami (OH) 35–31; won vs. Kansas State 31–26; lost at Arizona 7–34; lost at West Virginia 42–45+52−27Won 34–15 vs. Boston College+19Boston CollegeWon 62–10 vs. Western Carolina+52Western CarolinaWon 35–31 vs. Miami (OH)+4Miami (OH)Won 31–26 vs. Kansas State+5Kansas StateLost 7–34 at Arizona-27ArizonaLost 42–45 at West Virginia-3West Virginia
Each game’s margin, wins above the line and losses below.

Elo: a pregame chance from scores alone.

Record
4–⁠2
Conference
1–⁠2 tied for 8th in Big 12
AP now
Unranked
Points
211–⁠161
Coach
Scott Satterfield
Elo
1525 +27 this season
SP+ rating
5.3 No. 55 of 138; offense No. 39, defense No. 75, special teams No. 29
SRS
2.1 No. 58 of 138 in FBS
Returning
8% of last season’s EPA, No. 121 of 136
Recruiting class
No. 58 roster talent No. 77 in FBS
Offensive coordinators
Pete Thomas and Nic Cardwell
Defensive coordinators
Nate Woody and Cortney Braswell
Offense
Spread option
Defense
3–⁠4

How good, play by play

  • Offense13th of 138
  • Defense114th of 138
  • Offense, opponent-adjusted47th of 138
  • Defense, opponent-adjusted92nd of 138
EPA per playSuccessExplosivenessFBS rank
Offense0.2844%1.4913th of 138
Defense0.2144%1.33114th of 138
Opponent-adjusted0.14 off
0.14 def
40% off
44% def
—47th off
92nd def

Passing and running

Pass successDepth of targetDeep throwsLine yardsStuffed
Offense51%7.1 yds11%3.4014%
Defense46%8.4 yds14%3.1017%
How these are measured

Play-weighted averages over games against FBS opponents; raw numbers, not adjusted for the strength of the opponent. EPA (expected points added) measures how much each play changed the expected score; success rate counts plays that kept the offense on schedule; explosiveness is the average EPA on successful plays. Lower is better on defense. Ranked by EPA per play among teams that were FBS that season. The opponent-adjusted row (offense / defense) is CollegeFootballData.com’s WEPA, which accounts for who each team played. Passing and running: depth of target is how far downfield passes traveled in the air; deep throws are the share thrown deep, of the passes whose depth and direction the play-by-play describes (about half); line yards are the running yards per carry credited to the blockers; stuffed is the share of carries stopped at or behind the line. The defense’s line is what its opponents did. From CollegeFootballData.com, 2025 on.

Drives and havoc

Points per trip inside the 40Average startHavoc
Offense4.8own 2911% allowed
Defense4.5own 2415% caused

CORE rating -0.6, 69th of 138 (offense 2.9, defense 3.6).

A trip inside the 40 is a drive that reaches the opponent’s 40-yard line; points per trip is how many it scored on average (allowed, on defense). Average start is where drives began (the defense’s line is where its opponents started). Havoc is the share of plays ending in a tackle for loss, a forced fumble, an interception or a pass broken up. CORE is CollegeFootballData.com’s context- and opponent-adjusted rating (points better than an average team; lower is better on defense). From CollegeFootballData.com.

Leaders

Passing yardsJ.C. French QB1,338 yds
Passing touchdownsJ.C. French QB9 TD
Rushing yardsCole Tabb RB448 yds
Rushing touchdownsCole Tabb RB8 TD
Receiving yardsJaVonnie Gibson WR342 yds
Receiving touchdownsJaVonnie Gibson WR4 TD
TacklesJonathan Thompson LB51 tkl
SacksJosh Hough DL3 sacks
InterceptionsMark Cannon Jr. S2 INT

Top recruits in the 2026 class

Lance Dawson DL★★★★No. 344
Markell Taylor S★★★No. 774
Jaidon Windom S★★★No. 804
Jonathan Rulo DL★★★No. 833
Austin Hoane OL★★★No. 921

247Sports composite rankings via CollegeFootballData.com; national rank in the class.

The 2026 class by position

SignedStarsRating
Quarterbacks13.00.856
Running backs13.00.851
Receivers43.00.864
Offensive line53.00.865
Defensive line53.20.869
Linebackers23.00.859
Defensive backs53.00.865
Athletes and specialists13.00.869
Whole class243.00.864

High-school signees by position group, with their average stars and 247Sports composite rating (out of 1), via CollegeFootballData.com. Athletes are signees with no set position.

Roster 110

The 2026 roster

110 players, with numbers, heights, hometowns and each player’s 2026 line; 56 have a stat line. See the roster

2026 Big 12 standings

Conference page
TeamConf.OverallAP final
Texas Tech3–⁠06–⁠0
BYU3–⁠06–⁠0
Utah3–⁠06–⁠0
Houston3–⁠16–⁠1
Arizona2–⁠15–⁠1
Oklahoma State2–⁠14–⁠2
Baylor2–⁠14–⁠2
Cincinnati1–⁠24–⁠2
Kansas State1–⁠24–⁠2
Iowa State1–⁠23–⁠3
TCU1–⁠23–⁠3
UCF1–⁠23–⁠3
Arizona State1–⁠23–⁠3
West Virginia1–⁠34–⁠3
Kansas0–⁠32–⁠4
Colorado0–⁠32–⁠4

Ordered by conference winning percentage, then conference wins. Division splits and tiebreakers aren’t applied.