Clemson at South Carolina

Thursday, October 30, 1913

Clemson beat South Carolina 32–⁠0. It was their 11th meeting; after it, Clemson led the series 4–⁠2 in the games on file.

AwayClemson4–⁠4 in 1913
32
HomeSouth Carolina4–⁠3 in 1913
0

Final

In the newspapers

  • The The watchman and southron's story: CLEMSON Wins GREAT GAME, SCORES THIRTY TWO POINTS TO CAROLINA'S ZERO. Three Sumter Boys Play in Part of Game and DO Good WOrk-Inter- ference and Speed of Clemson and Costly Fumbles by Carolina Win Game.

    The watchman and southron, Sumter, S.C., November 5, 1913, page 1

    Read the text

    CLEMSON Wins GREAT GAME, SCORES THIRTY TWO POINTS TO CAROLINA’S ZERO. Three Sumter Boys Play in Part of Game and DO Good WOrk-Interference and Speed of Clemson and Costly Fumbles by Carolina Win Game. In their annual game at the South Carolina State Fair Clemson College put it all over the University of South Carolina football team Thursday afternOOn, winning the game by a score Of 32 to 0. The speed Of the Clemson ends and backfield men, ClemsOn’s beautiful in terference at all points in the game and costly fumbles by the Carolina backs were the chief causes to con. tribute toward Cardinals overwhelm. ing defeat. Five Of ClemsOn’s six tOuchdowns were directly or indirect. ly due. to fumbles by Carolina back. Four times the ball was dropped By the backs and picked up by the fast Clemson ends or backs and carried over Carolina’s goal line. Another time Hayward muffed a kick and a Clemson man recovered the ball with in striking distance Of Cardinals goal. Throughout the game Clemson was speedier than their opponents and their interference was as fine a feature Of football play as has ever been seen on the Fair ground at any game. In line plunging Carolina had the best Of it, the backs going through Glenn sons line repeatedly for good gains, while Cardinals line held like a stone ha NIL and repeatedly the Clemson backs were spilled at losses, when they tried the line. Clemson gained repeatedly on end runs, made possible by good interference. The game, however, was one Of kicking all the way through. Caroand throughout the first half only once tried line plunging. Clemson got the advantage in the exchange of kicks, for the Clemson men rarely failed to down the Carolina backs in their tracks when they received the ball, while the Clemson backs rarely failed to bring the ball forward for a good gain, because Of the assistance rendered the runner by his teams in reference. Several times Clemson recovered the ball on kicks. For Carolina, Hayward and Hill were the stars Oh defense, althOu gin the men in the line did beautiful work. Webb and Logan for Clemson were stars on Offense. ClemsOn’s line also held we’ll after it got on to Car Olina’s plunges and the ends were i’m pregnable. Three Sumter, or near Sumter boys were in part Of the game on the Clemson team and all of them did we’ll. Reeves played at half, for a good part OF the game, Randle played for more than a quarter at guard and DuRant played for nearly half of the game at full back. DuRant and Reeves live at DuRant, Clarendon county, and Randle lives in this city. All three have played on the local high school team, where they got their initiation in the great college sport. Reeves especially made some beautiful runs with the ball.

Public-domain newspapers from the Library of Congress’s Chronicling America, found through the American Stories dataset (Dell and Harvard, CC BY 4.0). The text is the machine reading of the page, mistakes and all.

Before kickoff

Our ratings going in

Our ratings (scores only)

South Carolina 59% to win. Clemson won as Elo’s underdog.

Officially, Clemson leads 74–⁠44–⁠4; as played, 70–⁠43–⁠4 in the 117 games on file; the official count covers all 122 meetings, counting the 111 since this game.

Recent meetings
2025Clemson 28, South Carolina 14
2024South Carolina 17, Clemson 14
2023Clemson 16, South Carolina 7
2022South Carolina 31, Clemson 30
2021Clemson 30, South Carolina 0
2019Clemson 38, South Carolina 3

Around this game

Clemson

South Carolina