Amherst at Dartmouth

Saturday, November 2, 1912

Dartmouth beat Amherst 60–⁠0. It was their 20th meeting; after it, Dartmouth led the series 14–⁠3–⁠3.

AwayAmherst1–⁠2 in 1912
0
HomeDartmouth7–⁠2 in 1912
60

FinalHigh 55°F, low 30°F

In the newspapers

  • The New-York tribune's story: EASY FOR DARTMOUTH Hanover Eleven Piles Up Big Score Against Amherst. USES MANY SUBSTITUTES Fumbling at Critical Points Robs the Green of More -TouchdoWns.

    New-York tribune, New York [N.Y.], November 3, 1912, page 11

    Read the text

    EASY FOR DARTMOUTH Hanover Eleven Piles Up Big Score Against Amherst. USES MANY SUBSTITUTES Fumbling at Critical Points Robs the Green of More -TouchdoWns. Hanover, N. H., Nov. 2.-Desplte the heavy and slippery field, Dartmouth came back yesterday and pushed Amherst all over the field With the score 90 to in her favor, the Green came back in the second half and piled up q more. five touchdowns by Morey, two by Hogsett and two by Whitney, together with five goals from touchdowns by Englehorn, being responsible for the score. Though the Green showed a great Improvement in their snap. they should have beaten the Amherst team at least 75–⁠0. Had they held the ball al least three times, when they were in the flve-yard line, tho score would have been q points larger The Green have not 10 date mastered the art Of holding on 10 the ball when they need 10 most. Fumbling and frequent penalties formed a big feature Of the game. As a whole. the Dartmouth line showed signs Of what they have IN them. There was a change in the line that has not been seen on the oval so far this year. Together with the change, the Green forwards possessed that necessary punch al the end OF their drive. The back field improved every opportunity 10 go for a hole, and though Heinie Hobbs, Am herst’s coach, claimed he had five first string linemen on the bench, 1t must be remembered that Dartmouth’s first string backfeld was never in the game all at once. Frequent substitutes In the Green backfeld weakened her chance OF rolling up a larger score. on the kickoff Captain Connolly, OF Amherst, returned the ball five yards. They failed TO gain after two attempts at line smashes and sent McGay back TO kick. Llewellyn returned the punt fifteen Yards and ran his team down TO the LIZARD line. Then il was that Whitney smiled a pass and Amherst received life. II was not long, however, until Dartmouth punched her way back and sent Morey over for the first touchdown After this the Green made first downs almost at will. and registered 81 points by the end OF the first half. The second half was much the same, Dartmouth kicking the ball most of the time and succeeding in making long gains through centre and around the ends. Ghee worked two pretty forward passes for forty and thirty yards. respectively. The sensation Of the second half was when Morey ran sixty yards through a broken field for his fourth touchdown He had on the play before gotten away for seventy-fve yards, but was called hack. and the Green was penalized for holding Whitney and Hogsett were botf good for substantial gains at any time the latter taking Whitney’s place at left half and giving up his end position &c Ashton. on the line Captain Bennett and Engie’ horn put up the best games. Englehorr fought like a wild man and tore up every thing that came near him. Behhet played hard, steady game. The Green hackers claim that II I’M Green show the fight they have In then thew will be table to take the scalp o. the Crimson. They have the beer ah’ are getting snapper every practice | Tho lineup follows:

  • The The Washington herald's story: WINS FROM AMHERST Heavy Green Team Scores at Will, Final Tally Being 60 to 0.

    The Washington herald, District of Columbia, November 3, 1912, page 43

    Read the text

    WINS FROM AMHERST Heavy Green Team Scores at Will, Final Tally Being 60 to 0. Hanover, N. H.. Nov. 2.-Dartmouth. showing a return to form. swamped Am herst to-day. winning by the score Of q to 0. Amherst. weakened by the absence of many fiEst-string men and outweighed twenty pounds. was unable to check the Green, and when it got possession Of the ball it did not gain consistently. The striking features Of the game were the end running Of Morey. Snow. and Hog sett. The Dartmouth line showed impr vement at times, but this development will need all that the crew Of coaches can give 1t before being able to cope with Harvard. Dartmouth scored In every Deriod, making nine IN all. Morey made five touchdowns, Whitney two. and Hog sett two. Whitney and Snow were both forced to leave the game because Of injuries, the extent Of which are not yet known.

  • The Evening star's story: VERY ONE.sIDED. Dartmouth Walks Away From Am. herst to the Tune of 60 to O.

    Evening star, November 3, 1912, page 61

    Read the text

    VERY ONE.sIDED. Dartmouth Walks Away From Am. herst to the Tune of 60 to O. | HANOVER, N. H. November 2.-Dartmouth walked away from Amherst today. l;winning 60 to 0. Fumbles at critical times prevented much larger score. iMorey of Dartmouth was the individual star Of the game. scoring five touchdowns, two Of which We’re made after sixty-yard Iruns. Dartmouth’s goal was never in danger. jWhitney, Dartmouth’s left halfback. was injured and will be out OF the game Tor la time.

Public-domain newspapers from the Library of Congress’s Chronicling America, found through the American Stories dataset (Dell and Harvard, CC BY 4.0). The text is the machine reading of the page, mistakes and all.

Before kickoff

Our ratings going in

Our ratings (scores only)

Dartmouth 85% to win. Elo’s favorite won.

Dartmouth leads 19–⁠3–⁠3 in 25 meetings, counting the five since this game.

Recent meetings
1941Dartmouth 47, Amherst 7
1937Dartmouth 31, Amherst 7
1915Dartmouth 26, Amherst 0
1914Dartmouth 32, Amherst 0
1913Dartmouth 21, Amherst 7
1912Dartmouth 60, Amherst 0

Around this game

Amherst

Dartmouth