South Dakota at Minnesota
Saturday, November 11, 1905 Share
Minnesota beat South Dakota 81–0. It was their second meeting; after it, Minnesota led the series 2–0.
FinalHigh 61°F, low 39°FAttendance 1,000
In the newspapers

The Minneapolis journal, Minneapolis, Minn., November 12, 1905, page 1
Read the text
GOPHERS STRIKE LIKE AVALANCHE Bury South Dakota Under 81 to @ Score-Record Should Have Been Better. Minnesota won from the South Dakota Agricultural school of Brooklngs, s. D., on Northrop field yesterday after noon. She won by one of those good old double-fgure scores that the Yost methods have made popular in the west, and the “Ski-U-Mah’ rooters, who are always crying for more touchdowns, left the scene Of combat very we’ll sat isfed with the one-sided count of 81 to 0. Minnesota won, not on account OF the form her team showed, but thru the lack Of form showed by her oppo nents Outweighed, outtrained, out generated and outclassed, the farmers failed to offer any effectual resistance to the gopher gridiron artists, and from whistle to whistle it was a ffty-minutes go-as-you-please, with Minnesota doing all the going. If the game was intended for practice, it missed it’s calling, for never did the aggies make it necessary for the gophers to display any real foot ball. But three times. during the two halves was Minnesota held for no gain, and once did the visitors succeed in making q gain in scrimmage, and that once the pigskin was advanced just two yards. Never was the varsity forced to punt, and the majority Of its at tempts resulted in long, staggering plunges thru the South Dakota line, or clean lieut. end runs varying from ten to fifty yards each. Gophers tumble. Minnesota showing was disappointing to gopher followers. Fumbling was all too frequent. Ittner, Cutting, Lar kin, Weisel and other members of the team offended in this line and, had their opponents been strong enough to take advantage of this weakness dis Rster would have been inevitable. In the first half Minnesota s inter ference was practically worthless. 1t was either slow in forming or else got away ahead Of the man with the ball. AS a result, the gopher gains were made by the Individual players who tore thru their opponents resisting line, and the man with the ball, unassisted by his team mates, often dragged two or three of the enemy yards toward the coveted goal. The long gains were al prowess. In the latter part of the game there were some evidences Of ma chine and some Of the runs then were made behind perfect interference. Joe Cutting was easily the sta1 ground-gainer for the gophers. His re, sistless offense was feature of the game. Every time he was given the DILL ue Was ROou 1Or SuDSIduClal Sdlu, and over and over again he got away mer played Captain Currents position at fullback and played it we’ll. He was usually good for long gains and his line plunging could not be stopped Larkin played the first half at quarter and ran the team with good judgment and some speed. He was injured and was replaced in the second period by “Mummy’‘ Weisel, who seemed to get more speed and better team play out of the gophers. His brilliant quarter, back runs resulted in long gains. Linemen Are Strong. In the line the men all played the game, altho their strength was never tested. They always got the charge on their lighter opponents, and the few times the visitors, had the ball, presented an invincible front. Brush car ried the leather time after time. San born also was called upon often ant responded with good gains. lttner when called back, was always there Marshall and Brush, on the ends, als’ did their full share Of the ball-lugging The aggies were plucky and Playe’ as hard at the end as they did in tn they were powerless both on offens and defense. McGillivray, at quarter carried off the honors for the visitors while Tuttle at left end once brok thru and tackled gopher for loss. The defeat administered by the bad gers last week has already borne fruit 5 as shown by the unusual display of SIX and one-sided game. The varsity yell ing brigade was in evidence, with tn old gopher battlecry, and several time new yells we’re tried with good effect. First Half. South Dakota won the toss and chose tn west goal. Kremer kicked off to Youngbere who carried the ball back to South Dakota l6-yard line. South Dakota failed to gai1 McGllivray kicked to South Dakota’s 25-yar line. On the first play Schuknect aroun the right end for fifteen yards. Cutting adde five yards thru left tackle and then carried til ball without opposition for the first touchdown Cutting kicked easy goal. Score, Minnesota, 6: South Dakota, 0. South Dakota kicked of to Kremer Mime sofas 25-yard line, from whence Larkin T. turned yards. Bergan made fifteen yart around right end. Cutting added another fl teen around the opposite end and then mad thru center for seven yards. He then adde another four yards thru left tackle Kreme ran fifteen yards around right end Kreme made three and Sanborn plowed thru * the second touchdown. Cutting missed goal. Score. Minnesota, IL: South Dakota, o. The Dakotans had no defense and Minnesot South Dakota kicked off to Kremer, who fun bled and South Dakota got the ball on Mimi sofas 85-yard line. Hughes failed to gain line buck. Fox thrown back for tire yard loss. McGillivray swung at the ball b. missed It on attempted kick. Three MINI sofa men fell on the ball on Minnesota’s 5O-yal line. Minnesota made fifteen yards around rigl end. Cutting ran thirtyfve yards with tv South Dakota men hanging to his clothin 1ttner negotiated five yards thru LETT tackl Oech then carried the leather over for the th touchdown and the crowd made effort smile Cutting kicked goal. Score, Minnesota IT; South Dakota, o. South Dakota kicked off to Marshall. who r turned the ball fifteen yards to Minnesota 80-yard line. Cutting went ten yards off rig tackle. Larkin waded thru the of Dakota for seven yards. Sanborn added five yard Brush put four yards on the pile off left tackl Marshall fumbled on the next play: but Mimi smashed the line for four yards more Burg. sk1rted right end and raced thirty yards The fourth touchdown. Larkin kicked out Cutting, who failed to make fair catch. Score, Minnesota, %; South Dakota O. South Dakota kicked off to Marshall, vi carried the ball twenty-five yards, to MINI sofas 35-yard line. Cutting renewed the slaug ter with four yards around left end. Burg, was the first man who failed to gain. Bru carried the ball fifteen yards. Kremer ma three. Cutting duplicated Brush’s gain Burg made eight yards around right end and Bru added three yards in the same place on Il next attempt. Larkin then made another touchdown with 2O-yard quarterback run around left end On ting kicked goal. Score: Minnesota, %; South Dakota O. South Dakota kicked off to Larkin who , turned twenty yards to Minnesota’s 35-yard lii Larkin was injured in the melee that f,

The Fairmont West Virginian, Fairmont, W. Va., November 13, 1905, page 5 (results column)
Read the text
SATURDAYS FOOTBALL A s’a /. RESULTS EAST AND WEST AT Columbus-ohio Medical Univer s.ty 81; Antioch College o. At Topeka-Kansas University IS; Washburn College IL. At prlnceton-Princeton 15; Cornell g. At Observation-Disclosures IL: Harvard G. At New Haven-Yale II; Brown o. At springleld-Darmouth o; Am herst 0. 49,, At Annapolis-Navy “a; Bucknell o. At Carlisle-Dickinso IS; Lehigh O. AT Belfonte-=SState College rs; Gene va o., ,.At ssyraeuse55syracuse ls: Holy Cross 4. At West Point-Indians G; West Point 8. At Ann Arbor-M Michigan 40; Ohio State University o.. AT Chicago-Chicago 10; Purdue O. At Pittsburg-western Universits Of Pennsylvania IL: Wash-JeT o.. “, At West Point N. Y.-Carlisle 6; West Point 8. At Carlisle-Dickison 1; Lehigh o. At NEUTRALITY-SUSPICIOUS. IS; Will liams 0. ‘sssaiss’ y At Marietta Ohio Kenyon G; Mari. eta 5. I; At Minneapolis-M Minnesota 81! South Dakota 0. AT. Washington University of yir. ginia Sc; George Washington O. At Cincinnati-Cincinnati “a; Ohio Wesleyan o. At Madison-Wisconsin A; Beloit o. At Medford, Mass.-Tufts 10; Uni versity of Maine 0. At Exeter, N. H.-Andover IS; Exc ter O.. At Observation-Disclosures 10; Union At New Haven-Yale dsos) 1s: Princeton q9Os) 0. At Amherst-Amherst 0: Dart. mouth 0. 2 At Evanston Northwestern a4A- Ohio Northern o. AZ At Burlington-Univers of Yer. mont II; Fort Ethan Allen o. At Raleigh N. C.-North Carolina State o; State Agricultural o. At Hamilton, N. Y.-Colgate Acad. envy IS; Utica Free Academy o. : Att Lexington-Kentucky Agricul. tural IL: Cumberland University II. At Bloomington. Ind.-Indiana 30; Notre Dame 5. At rdsville-wabash 81: Knox 0. At Huntington-Marshan College o; Ohio University 5. 81. AT Morgantown-c California Norniai II; West Virginia 0. At San Francisco-Stanfo UiSersity IL; California University 8. s AT Springfield, o.-Wittenlurg Uni yersity IL; Dennison University 10.

The Topeka state journal, Topeka, Kansas, November 12, 1905, page 3 (results column)
Read the text
CRIMSON BEATEN. Result of the Contest at Philadelphia a Great Surprise. Harvard a Heavy FaYOrite Over u. of P. in the Betting. SCORE STOOD ~ TO s. Quakers Played Rings Around Them in Second. A New Football Star Developed in the Person of Levine. A Crowd of Twenty-One ThOus- and Spectators Present. SCORE STOOD – TO s. At Chicago-C Chicago 10, Purdue O. At Evanston Ill – Northwestern 81. Ohio Northern o. At Ann Acknowledgment ~ ONO State o. At Madison-Wisconsin ~, Belolt u At Minneapolis – Minnesota 81 South Dakota 0. At adelphia-Pennsylva IL Harvard 8. At New Haven-Yale IL, Brown 0; yale freshmen IS, Princeton freshmen At west Point-carlisle 6, West Point 8. AT Amherst-Amhers o. Dartmouth At napolis-Navy “a, BuckneIl o. At Des Moines-Drake university 8, Haskell Indians 4. At Iowa City-State university r. Des Moines college 0. At Grinnell-Ames 80, Grinnell 4 AT Observation-Disclosures Is, Colorado o. At Topeka-Kansas university – Washburn II. At Columbia, Most. Louis universe ty II; Missouri 0. At Carlisle, Pa.-Dickinson IS, Lehigh o. At Columbia, NIo.-Kansas City Cen trail High School IL; st. Louis Central High School 0. At Palo Alto-Stanford -; University of California 5,
Public-domain newspapers from the Library of Congress’s Chronicling America, found through the American Stories dataset (Dell and Harvard, CC BY 4.0). The text is the machine reading of the page, mistakes and all.
Before kickoff
Our ratings going in
Our ratings (scores only)
Minnesota 98% to win. Elo’s favorite won.
The series
Every South Dakota–Minnesota gameMinnesota leads 9–2 in 11 meetings, counting the nine since this game.
Around this game
South Dakota
- Next gameat NebraskaOct. 6, 1906
- SeasonSouth Dakota in 1905
- ProgramSouth Dakota history and records
Minnesota
- Next gamevs. NebraskaNov. 18, 1905
- SeasonMinnesota in 1905
- ProgramMinnesota history and records

