Cornell at Harvard

Wednesday, October 27, 1897

Harvard beat Cornell 24–⁠5. It was their seventh meeting; after it, Harvard led the series 7–⁠0.

AwayCornell5–⁠3–⁠1 in 1897
5
HomeHarvard10–⁠1–⁠1 in 1897
24

FinalHigh 60°F, low 37°F

In the newspapers

  • The New-York tribune's story: tumble over him. while Smith kept on 70 tne Gnu r o his forty-yard run, and made the only po'''' '''' PENNSYLVANIA 0; Cadets. T. HARVARD. "a; CORNELL, .. A GOAL FROM THE FIELD KICKED BY TIE 'oi'- NELL. ouARTERBACt

    New-York tribune, New York [N.Y.], October 31, 1897, page 8

    Read the text

    tumble over him. while Smith kept on 70 tne Gnu r o his forty-yard run, and made the only po’‘‘‘ ‘‘‘‘ PENNSYLVANIA 0; Cadets. T. HARVARD. “a; CORNELL, .. A GOAL FROM THE FIELD KICKED BY TIE ‘oi’- NELL. ouARTERBACt | caubridoe Mass oct 3O.-Harvard easily oe- ! feated Cornell on Soldiers Field to-day. ou’ was scored against for the first time this season ,’‘ | ward made four touchdowrs. and forced ‘orhe” “ make a safety while in the frs; halt, after gain ! Ing the ball on a mured kick Young Kicked ! nrettv goal from the field for Cornell This MADE ! the ANAL score with three goals from touchdo”hs’ ! “a to 3 in favor of the Harvard men ! The game far from being “a clean an eA- ! hib,tion OF football as that between Harvard ana Rrown last week and at the close Of the first hall | Haryard’s outlook was dscouraging. In spite OF ! Dibblee’s tumble the crimson should nave maui much better stand TO protect the goal anu hhu | not the Cornell backs hammered so successiuiy at the right Of Harvards line 1t Is douptfui “he’h er Cornell would have got near enough to fisN Inc kick TIE management OF the plays In the second nan showed that Harvard had kept up better reserve strength than the spectators had counted on Boal who has made a good name FOR hinseii as d line bucker. hardly used at all Until ‘hs SCI ond half The advantage for Harvard was double one for Boal invariably made his distance ana gave the regular backs d breathing space. Shortly after Harvard received the ball on Cor nells kickoff. Dibblee down the field Win swarm OF red ard white Ia cklers at his hoef, Dat he squlrmed, lodged and wrigge6 through them iof a Of sixty yards. Ha7vard’s first touch’o”h would have come earlier but for penalty ior on side play. Corn,i however. was forced 10 ki’N. and Dihbee Parker and cabot brought the baii down TO COrnels goal line the las; named carrying II over IN five minutes from the beginning OF inc game. Garrison kicked the goal. Cornelrs goal from the fed came few minutes | later and the Harvard sympahzera who thought | Cornell an easy thirg dIsmayed. shorty after the kick off Cornell got the ball In Harvard terri | tory and began d series Of attacks on harVaruS | right which Mills and Shaw seemed pow”rless 10 keep back. Then Dempsey kicked 20 Dibhiee. VINO fumbled. Here Harvards defence went to pieces and Cornell soon had the ball within easy distance of the goal though bit to one side. Quarterback ! Young took the ball. and before harvard ruSHer | could get in the way 1t was sailing over the par ! The play during the rest Of the first half was decidedly poor on both sides. the moment OF b’ea’eS. interest being when McKeever was forced back OF the Cornell line on Warrens punt and compelled by | Parker 70 make a safety. This ended the scoring | for the first half In the second half Harvard kicked of. but soon reeained the ball and Boa Tas put N for q” uiay and kicked But Parker was through ,Q 9i se ng the bali. Parker made yards and Boai / ten more for a touchd9wn GARRISON K’‘Aeu ‘‘‘ | After the next kick-of Dibbee made hfty-hveyard run aided by good blocking of and then nar boweycr ard rmshos by Cabot and Boal carried the bail over for the third time Parker vas disquan; fed for smuggling soon after Cornell kick-on, ana Sullivan took his place only TO get hurt n Tb Two a or three minutes. Sawn took his phce ,oca ne On aS good run. but Garrison failed on the goal ,o,o -, BY far the best work on either side was d9ne ~ ! Dibblee His running and lodging ana ablIi’y 10 | keep his feet have rarely been equalled or faii ! ward field He certainly did all that man , no,n ! n retrieve his tumble. Warrens worK al fuilta’k was neither good nor bad He made many sh0rr’ | gains through centre. but never showed W, Diii. | iantIy Parker did fair work with the bail; pu’ | did not prove himself any better than Su.Nah, | He was quick enough however. In getting through work was decidedly erratic in the FIRST half put showed Il marked improvement In the second, a, | times the line seemed practically impresnaoie al Others it down Ike ninepins on the 9nen en-, siye Harvard put up strong game rms uiu ~, appear in the first half, but came out vel IN the second a fact which may he accounted TOT 10y tlo ! evident purpose TO keep the heaviest hgeiess’N’ work until Cornell was tired out For Gorneii zap, | tain McKeever did the best work ne ‘otheH men proved incapable of keeping up sharp oIic t sive game. and were weak behind the Inc Inc lineup follows:

  • The The record-union's story: ON The GRIDIRON. STANFORD BEATS RELIANCE AT FOOTBALL. Cornell Comes Out Second Best IN a Game With Harvard by a Score Of "a to 5.

    The record-union, October 31, 1897, page 1

    Read the text

    ON The GRIDIRON. STANFORD BEATS RELIANCE AT FOOTBALL. Cornell Comes Out Second Best IN a Game With Harvard by a Score Of “a to 5. SAN. JOSE. Oct. 30.-To-day for the third time this season the Stanford University team made the Reliance eleven feel the pangs Of defeat. Ihe score standing i to 6 in favor of the collegians. The game took place IN the Cvclers’ Park gridiron, and was Wilt messed by about one thousand people, a large proportion of whom were stu dents. 1t was not an easy victory for Stan ford. as the Reliance athletes put up a hard fsht, making many brilliant plays at critical moments Reliance dld all of its scoring in the first half, the var sity boys seeming to be content with playing the defensive. Reliance took advantage of this pleasing state OF al fairs ard did some fast work Carter made a touchdown, and Wyckof kick ed d goal, and when the first half closed the score stood . to U, Stanford being at the cipher end. Then the collegians took the offensive, and it did not take long for them to show their superiority. Murphy, STAN ford’s quarter back, played IN great form. and experienced no difficulty in passing through Reliance’s interference. Fisher made the first touchdown Tor Stanford soon afterward and Murphy kicked a goal, tieing the score. Daily made a great run, landing the ball safely over the line and putting the colIegians in the lead. Murphy kick ed another goal, increasing the score of the varsity team to an even dozen. In the last four minutes Reliance made a desperate effort to pull the game out of the fire, but while they succeeded in keeping the Stanford eleven busy, they failed to score. CAMBRIDGE (OIass.), Oct. 30.-Harward easily defeated Cornell on Soldiers Field to-day, but was scored on for the first time this season. Harvard made four touchdowns and forced Cor nell to make a safety, while in the first half, after gaining the ball ON a muffed kick, Young kicked a pretty goal from the field for Cornell. This made the final score, with three goals from touchdowns, q to 3 in favor of the Harvard men. At the last of the first half Harvard’s outlook was discourage ing. The crimson should have made a much better stand to protect the goal and had not the Cornell backs hammer ed successfully at the right of Har wards line it isdoubtful whether Cornell would have got near enough to risk the kick. Harvard’s defensive work was decidedly erratic in the first half, but showed a marked Improvement in the second half. On the offensive Harvard put up. on the whole, a strong game Score: Harvard q, Cornell 3. WEST POINT IN. Y.). Oct 30-The h16 II nm fI7aiY c1a fO,. Va to-day. and had it not been for a run by one of Yale’s speedy backs, the score would have been to 0 in favor of West Point, instead of a tie West Point played a superb game, and, according to Walter Camp, “Yale’s detense is a thing of the past” They could net hold the strong line, and re- ! peated gains were made through the veteran Rogers position, Yale g. West Point g. / Princeton defeated the strong Dart mouth team to-day by a score of 80 20 ( o. The game was marked by it’s fierce / ness, and the fact that the Tigers goal was dangerously threatened in the first / half, touchdown being avoided only through an unfortunate decision of the ACAHA-S, T” iO gave the pail TO princeton / when on the 15-yard line for holding the lire Princeton’s interference and team work in the first half was ex- / tremely ragged. | SAN FRANCISCO, Oct. 30.-over 5000 people at Recreation Park this afternoon witnessed the annual fresh men game between Stanford University and the University Of California. 1t was ! the most hotly contested match which | has taken place in all the years since i the freshmen of the two colleges began / lining up against each other. Fresh / men are not expected to play frst-class ! football, and in to-day’s game there was absolutely no Interference worthy of the ! name and fumbles were frequent. but what was lacking in science was made + up in vigor. The Stanford players won / the oaraa nv n score of & f0 &

  • The The Indianapolis journal's story: HARVARD, "a; CORNELL, 5. First Time This Season the Crimsons Have Been scored Against.

    The Indianapolis journal, Indianapolis [Ind.], October 31, 1897, page 1

    Read the text

    HARVARD, “a; CORNELL, 5. First Time This Season the Crimsons Have Been scored Against. Have Been Scored Against. CAMBRIDGE, Oct. 3O.-Harvard easily defeated Cornell on Soldiers field to-day, but was scored on for the first time this season. Harvard made four touchdowns and forced Cornell to make a safety, while in the first half, after gaining the ball on a muffer kick, Young kicked a pretty goal from the field for Cornell. This made the final score, with three goals from touch downs, “a to in favor of the Harvard men. AT the close of the Arst half Harvard’s outlook was discouraging. The crimson should have made much better stand to protect the goal and had not the Cornell backs hammered so successfully at the right of Harvard’s line 1t is doubtful whether Cornell would have got near enough to risk the kick The management of the plays in the second half have showed that Harvard had kept up a better reserve strength than the spectators had counted on. Boal, who has made good name for himself as a line bucker, was hardly used at all until the second half. !, By far the best work on either side was done by Dibblee. Warren’s work at full back was neither good nor bad. Parker did fair work with the ball, but did not prove himself any better than Sullivan. Harwards defensive work was decidedly erratic in the first half, but showed a marked Improvement in the second. On the offensive Harvard put up on the whole a strong game. This did not appear in the first half, but it came out well in the second. For Cornell, Captain McKeever did by far the best work. The Cornells proved Incapable of keeping up sharp offensive game and were weak behind the line They were remarkably susceptible to injuries, full half of the time being taken out of that account Score-Hafvard. “a; Cornell s. Touch downs-Cabot, Boaf o. Mills. Goals from Young

  • The The Saint Paul globe's story: HARVARD SCORED ON. Goal Kicked From the Field by Young, of Cornell.

    The Saint Paul globe, October 31, 1897, page 10

    Read the text

    HARVARD SCORED ON. Goal Kicked From the Field by Young, of Cornell. Goal Kicked From the Field by Young, of Cornell. CAMBRIDGE, Mass, Oct Solar ward easily defeated Cornell on Sol diers’ Field today, but was scored on for the first time this season. Harvard made four ouch-downs, and forced Cornell to make a safety. While in the first half, after gaining the ball on a muffed kick, Young kicked a pretty goal from the field for Cornell. This made the final score, with three goals from touchdowns, “a to 5 in favor of the Harvard men. At the close of the first half Harvard’s outlook was dis couraging. The Crimson should have made a much better stand to protect the goal, and had not the Cornell backs hammered so successfully at the right of Harvard’s line, it is doubtful whether Cornell would have got near enough to risk the kick. The management of the plays in the second half, however, showed that Harvard had kept up a better reserve strength than the spec tators had counted on. Boal, who has made good name for himself as line breaker, was hardly used at all until the second half. By far the best work on either side was done by Dibblee. Warren’s work at full back was neither good nor bad. fdrker uio lalr “oIh Will tue oe’il’ DA1 did not prove himself any better than Sullivan. Harvard’s defensive work was decidedly erratic in the first half, but showed a marked Improvement In the second On the offensive Harvard put up, on the whole. a strong game. For Cornell Capt. McKeever did by far the best work. The Cornells proved incapable of keeping up sharp often sive game, and were weak behind the line Score: Harvard “a, Cornell s.; touchdowns, Cabot, Boal 2, Mills; goals from touchdowns, Garrison 3; goal from field, Young.

Public-domain newspapers from the Library of Congress’s Chronicling America, found through the American Stories dataset (Dell and Harvard, CC BY 4.0). The text is the machine reading of the page, mistakes and all.

Before kickoff

Our ratings going in

Our ratings (scores only)

Harvard 69% to win. Elo’s favorite won.

Harvard leads 47–⁠21–⁠1 in 69 meetings, counting the 62 since this game.

Recent meetings
2026Harvard 41, Cornell 29
2025Harvard 34, Cornell 10
2024Harvard 38, Cornell 20
2023Harvard 41, Cornell 23
2022Harvard 35, Cornell 28
2021Harvard 24, Cornell 10

Around this game

Cornell

Harvard