Vanderbilt at Georgia

Saturday, November 18, 1922

Vanderbilt beat Georgia 12–⁠0. It was their fifth meeting; after it, Vanderbilt led the series 4–⁠0–⁠1.

AwayVanderbilt8–⁠0–⁠1 in 1922
12
HomeGeorgia5–⁠4–⁠1 in 1922
0

FinalHigh 75°F

In the newspapers

  • The The Birmingham age-herald's story: MANDY KEEPS ITS. SLATE CLEAN BY. BEATING GEORGIA. Commodores Execute Two Long Passes to Defeat Bull dogs, 12 to 0

    The Birmingham age-herald, Alabama, November 19, 1922, page 11

    Read the text

    MANDY KEEPS ITS. SLATE CLEAN BY. BEATING GEORGIA. Commodores Execute Two Long Passes to Defeat Bull dogs, 12 to 0 Athens, Ga, November 1S.-Van- derblt today defeated the University of Georgia Bulldogs, 12 to 0. the Commodores thereby maintaining their perfect record of the season. Vanderbilt has won every game played with southern teams this sea- son and held Michigan to too tie. The contest was a bunting duel from the start. In the main tho vandy kicks were for greater dis tance and less cratic than Georgia 5 which kept the play in Bulldog ter ritory in all but the second quarter. Vanderbilt scored early in the first period. A forward pass, Nicely to Bomar, netted 47 yards, putting the ball on Georgia,s three-yard line. Reese carried 1t over on the next play. Wakefield’s try at goal failed. With the same maneuver in the third quarter. the Commodores registered another six points. Kuhn passed to Bomar. who made 45 yards and touchdown. bnudy Holds Collins, playing quarter for Georgia in the absence of Mulvihill, got the range for his punts in the second period and the Bulldogs in- vaded Vandy territory for the first time. Line smashes by Tanner and Fletcher, 15-yard pass, Randall to Anderson, brought the Georgians to the Commodore goal There. how ever, Vanderbilt intercepted a Geor- gia pass over the goal line and Geor- gia’s hopes for a touchdown melted. Nicely promptly punted to midfieId and safety. Vanderbilt neared score in the final period when the visitors backed the Bulldogs to their two-foot line. Here Vandy was penalized five yards for offside and Reese lost four more in an attempt to skirt the Georgia end Georgia’s line held and Vandy gave up the ball. We’ll Matched In straight football the teams were well matched, both in defense and offense. The lineup: Georgia. Richardson. l. e. Bennett, l. t; Yandiver, l. g: Boney, c; Whel- chell, tx CD r. g; Taylor, r. t; An derson. r. e; Ceilings, q; Randall, l. h. b; Fletcher, r. Il. b; Tanner, f. b. Vanderbilt: Bomar, l. c; Bradford, r. t Morrow. |. g; Sharpe, c; Kelley, r. g; Walker, r. t; Neill, T. e; Kuhn. q; Reese. l. h. b. Neely, r. h. b; Wakefield, f. b.. Scores by periods: Vanderbilt ....... 6 O o-i2 Georgia ...... 0 0 O. Vanderbilt scoring: Touchdowns, Reese, Bomar. Referee, Elcock (Dartmouth); um- pire, Springer Pennsylvania head linesman. Stewart (Dartmouth). Time of periods 15 minutes each. SEAMAN FINED Mobile, Ala. November 1s.-Ber- nard Kluer, one of the crew of six

  • The Richmond times-dispatch. (Richmond, Va.) 1914-current's story: VANDERBILT TRIMS GEORGIA AND MAINTAINS CLEAN SLATE

    Richmond times-dispatch. (Richmond, Va.) 1914-current, Virginia, November 19, 1922, page 50

    Read the text

    VANDERBILT TRIMS GEORGIA AND MAINTAINS CLEAN SLATE dall to Anderson brought the GeorEians to the Commodore. goal. There. however Vanderbilt intercept cd Georgia pass over the goal line and Georgii’s hopes for touchdown melted. Nicely promptly punted to midaeid and safety. Vanderbilt neared third score m the Anal period when the visitors backed the Bulldogs to their two foot line. Here Vanderbilt was p.nalizcd five yards for on-side and Reese lost four more in an attempt .” skirt the Georgia end. Geurgia’s line held and NEndy gave up tn” ball. In straight football the teams were well matched. both in defense and unense. NHnderbilts advantage dwclt In the more facils tie OF Nicely. Com mudnre right end In

  • The Bisbee daily review's story: Football Results

    Bisbee daily review, November 19, 1922, page 6 (results column)

    Read the text

    Football Results Denver University 20; Colorado Col lege IA. Ohio Wesleyan 65: Case o. Swarthmore ?; Annapolis Midship- men 2. (tie). Princeton 8; Yale o. Cornell AS; Albright A. Harvard o; Brown 3. Syracuse IA; Colgate ‘. Dartmouth 2S; Columbia 2. Washington and Jefferson 0: Pitts burg 19. Chicago 9: Illinois O. Michigan E; Wisconsin 6. Ohio State 9; Iowa IF. Kansas 39; Colorado 6. Missouri 27; Washington o. Maryland University 3; Johns Hop kins O. Western Reserve 19: Kenyon 3. Georgetown 19; Bucknell z. Tufts 6; Massachusetts Aggies 6. Coe 13: Cornell College ‘. Auburn 6; Centre 0. V. p. l. Al: Washington and Lee 6. Drake 21; Grinnell o. !. Oklahoma Normal IA; Ames 13. Notre Dame 32; Butler 3. Wabash 35; Chicago Y. NJ. C. A. Col lege ‘. Williams 27; Amherst 0. Vanderbilt 12; Georgia 0. Tennessee IS; Sewanee 27. Northwestern 5S; Monmouth IA. Nebraska 21; Kansas Aggies O. Colorado Aggies 19; Colorado School of Mines O. Texas 32; Oklahoma 2. Alabama O; Kentucky 6. West Point 39 Bates 0. Virginia Military Institute 45; George Washington 0. Depauw “A; Hanover 0. North Carolina 0: Davidson 6. University of Arizona 10; Universi- of New Mexico o. University Of Oregon 10; Oregon Aggies O. Carolina 61: Nevada 13. University of Utah 24; Whitman College 6. University of Southern California IA: University of Idaho O. University of Washington 12; Stan ford s. Bayler University 10; Oklahoma Az gies O. Walsenburg o; Pueblo Centennial High 21. Salida o; Pueblo Central High, sec, Ond team 20. Canon City 2; Colorado Springs 30. Phoenix Junior College AT; Flagstaff Normal O.. Mesa High ‘; Phoenix High 19. Pomona 20; University of California Southern Branch, 6. Occidental College 19; California In stitute of Technology 13. Gonzales University v; University of Wyoming O.

Public-domain newspapers from the Library of Congress’s Chronicling America, found through the American Stories dataset (Dell and Harvard, CC BY 4.0). The text is the machine reading of the page, mistakes and all.

Before kickoff

Our ratings going in

Our ratings (scores only)

Vanderbilt 50% to win. Elo’s favorite won.

Georgia leads 61–⁠17–⁠2 in 80 meetings, counting the 75 since this game.

Recent meetings
2026Georgia 38, Vanderbilt 14
2023Georgia 37, Vanderbilt 20
2022Georgia 55, Vanderbilt 0
2021Georgia 62, Vanderbilt 0
2019Georgia 30, Vanderbilt 6
2018Georgia 41, Vanderbilt 13

Around this game

Vanderbilt

Georgia