CollegeFootballDigestfrom CooperSearch

UTSA football money

In 2024-25, UTSA football brought in $17.9 million and spent $17.9 million, the 83rd-most revenue of 124 FBS programs. That’s $2.6 million for each of its 7 wins. 118 players were on the roster, with 14 assistant coaches.

Revenue and expenses

2012: revenue $6.2 million2012: expenses $6.2 million’122013: revenue $7.3 million2013: expenses $7.3 million2014: revenue $8.6 million2014: expenses $8.6 million’142015: revenue $8.8 million2015: expenses $8.8 million2016: revenue $10.6 million2016: expenses $10.6 million’162017: revenue $10.5 million2017: expenses $10.5 million2018: revenue $11.2 million2018: expenses $11.2 million’182019: revenue $10.2 million2019: expenses $10.2 million2020: revenue $10.6 million2020: expenses $10.6 million’202021: revenue $12.8 million2021: expenses $12.8 million2022: revenue $16.7 million2022: expenses $16.7 million’222023: revenue $17.8 million2023: expenses $17.8 million2024: revenue $17.9 million2024: expenses $17.9 million’24

Revenue Expenses (top: $17.9M)

Beside the American Athletic Conference, 2024-25

8th of 12 in revenue
  1. South Florida$33.4M / $33.4M
  2. Temple$26.3M / $26.3M
  3. Tulane$24.0M / $22.7M
  4. Memphis$22.0M / $22.0M
  5. Tulsa$20.7M / $20.7M
  6. Rice$19.6M / $19.6M
  7. Florida Atlantic$19.3M / $19.3M
  8. UTSA$17.9M / $17.9M
  9. East Carolina$16.5M / $16.5M
  10. North Texas$15.4M / $15.4M
  11. UAB$14.4M / $13.2M
  12. Charlotte$11.9M / $15.6M

Each member’s football revenue (the thick bar) and expenses (the thin one under it) that year, as the schools reported them; schools count revenue differently.

Against the American Athletic

revenue, 2012-13 to 2024-25

  1. South Florida

    $33.4M in 24–⁠25

  2. Temple

    $26.3M in 24–⁠25

  3. Tulane

    $24.0M in 24–⁠25

  4. Memphis

    $22.0M in 24–⁠25

  5. Tulsa

    $20.7M in 24–⁠25

  6. Rice

    $19.6M in 24–⁠25

  7. Florida Atlantic

    $19.3M in 24–⁠25

  8. UTSA

    $17.9M in 24–⁠25

  9. East Carolina

    $16.5M in 24–⁠25

  10. North Texas

    $15.4M in 24–⁠25

  11. UAB

    $14.4M in 24–⁠25

  12. Charlotte

    $11.9M in 24–⁠25

Each program’s football revenue by season, as each school reports it (EADA), on one scale (top: $33.4M), for the programs in the American Athletic this season, most revenue first; UTSA in its color.

By season

SeasonRevenueExpensesRecordSpent a winRankRosterAssistants
2024-25$17.9M$17.9M7–⁠6$2.6M83 of 12411814
2023-24$17.8M$17.8M9–⁠4$2.0M79 of 12511514
2022-23$16.7M$16.7M11–⁠3$1.5M79 of 12311714
2021-22$12.8M$12.8M12–⁠2$1.1M88 of 12211510
2020-21$10.6M$10.6M7–⁠5$1.5M85 of 12011910
2019-20$10.2M$10.2M4–⁠8$2.5M100 of 12311910
2018-19$11.2M$11.2M3–⁠9$3.7M91 of 12311410
2017-18$10.5M$10.5M6–⁠5$1.8M91 of 1231049
2016-17$10.6M$10.6M6–⁠7$1.8M85 of 1211169
2015-16$8.8M$8.8M3–⁠9$2.9M94 of 1221199
2014-15$8.6M$8.6M4–⁠8$2.1M87 of 1221179
2013-14$7.3M$7.3M7–⁠5$1.0M97 of 1221109
2012-13$6.2M$6.2M8–⁠4$0.8M7 of 1141059

As The University of Texas at San Antonio reports them to the US Department of Education under the Equity in Athletics Disclosure Act (ope.ed.gov/athletics). Schools count revenue differently (some include institutional support), so compare with care. “Spent a win” is the year’s football expenses over that season’s wins. Rank is football revenue among programs in the same division that season. Browse every school’s in the data.