CollegeFootballDigestfrom CooperSearch

North Texas football money

In 2024-25, North Texas football brought in $15.4 million and spent $15.4 million, the 89th-most revenue of 124 FBS programs. That’s $2.6 million for each of its 6 wins. 165 players were on the roster, with 11 assistant coaches.

Revenue and expenses

2012: revenue $8.2 million2012: expenses $6.5 million’122013: revenue $9.1 million2013: expenses $7.3 million2014: revenue $8.3 million2014: expenses $5.1 million’142015: revenue $12.8 million2015: expenses $8.4 million2016: revenue $9.9 million2016: expenses $9.9 million’162017: revenue $13.7 million2017: expenses $13.7 million2018: revenue $11.7 million2018: expenses $11.7 million’182019: revenue $10.7 million2019: expenses $10.7 million2020: revenue $10.1 million2020: expenses $10.1 million’202021: revenue $11.3 million2021: expenses $11.3 million2022: revenue $14.5 million2022: expenses $14.5 million’222023: revenue $13.3 million2023: expenses $13.3 million2024: revenue $15.4 million2024: expenses $15.4 million’24

Revenue Expenses (top: $15.4M)

Beside the American Athletic Conference, 2024-25

10th of 12 in revenue
  1. South Florida$33.4M / $33.4M
  2. Temple$26.3M / $26.3M
  3. Tulane$24.0M / $22.7M
  4. Memphis$22.0M / $22.0M
  5. Tulsa$20.7M / $20.7M
  6. Rice$19.6M / $19.6M
  7. Florida Atlantic$19.3M / $19.3M
  8. UTSA$17.9M / $17.9M
  9. East Carolina$16.5M / $16.5M
  10. North Texas$15.4M / $15.4M
  11. UAB$14.4M / $13.2M
  12. Charlotte$11.9M / $15.6M

Each member’s football revenue (the thick bar) and expenses (the thin one under it) that year, as the schools reported them; schools count revenue differently.

Against the American Athletic

revenue, 2012-13 to 2024-25

  1. South Florida

    $33.4M in 24–⁠25

  2. Temple

    $26.3M in 24–⁠25

  3. Tulane

    $24.0M in 24–⁠25

  4. Memphis

    $22.0M in 24–⁠25

  5. Tulsa

    $20.7M in 24–⁠25

  6. Rice

    $19.6M in 24–⁠25

  7. Florida Atlantic

    $19.3M in 24–⁠25

  8. UTSA

    $17.9M in 24–⁠25

  9. East Carolina

    $16.5M in 24–⁠25

  10. North Texas

    $15.4M in 24–⁠25

  11. UAB

    $14.4M in 24–⁠25

  12. Charlotte

    $11.9M in 24–⁠25

Each program’s football revenue by season, as each school reports it (EADA), on one scale (top: $33.4M), for the programs in the American Athletic this season, most revenue first; North Texas in its color.

By season

SeasonRevenueExpensesRecordSpent a winRankRosterAssistants
2024-25$15.4M$15.4M6–⁠7$2.6M89 of 12416511
2023-24$13.3M$13.3M5–⁠7$2.7M96 of 12513710
2022-23$14.5M$14.5M7–⁠7$2.1M88 of 12313710
2021-22$11.3M$11.3M6–⁠7$1.9M92 of 12213110
2020-21$10.1M$10.1M4–⁠6$2.5M87 of 12011610
2019-20$10.7M$10.7M4–⁠8$2.7M91 of 12311010
2018-19$11.7M$11.7M9–⁠4$1.3M89 of 12310910
2017-18$13.7M$13.7M9–⁠5$1.5M78 of 12312110
2016-17$9.9M$9.9M5–⁠8$2.0M90 of 1211139
2015-16$12.8M$8.4M1–⁠11$8.4M76 of 1221059
2014-15$8.3M$5.1M4–⁠8$1.3M89 of 1221039
2013-14$9.1M$7.3M9–⁠4$0.8M83 of 1221139
2012-13$8.2M$6.5M4–⁠8$1.6M82 of 1191099

As University of North Texas reports them to the US Department of Education under the Equity in Athletics Disclosure Act (ope.ed.gov/athletics). Schools count revenue differently (some include institutional support), so compare with care. “Spent a win” is the year’s football expenses over that season’s wins. Rank is football revenue among programs in the same division that season. Browse every school’s in the data.