UTEP football money

In 2024-25, UTEP football brought in $13.1 million and spent $11.1 million, the 102nd-most revenue of 124 FBS programs. That’s $3.7 million for each of its 3 wins. 114 players were on the roster, with 16 assistant coaches.

Revenue and expenses

2012: revenue $11.8 million2012: expenses $8.7 million’122013: revenue $11.8 million2013: expenses $8.7 million2014: revenue $10.4 million2014: expenses $7.8 million’142015: revenue $11.6 million2015: expenses $9.2 million2016: revenue $12.5 million2016: expenses $9.7 million’162017: revenue $13.4 million2017: expenses $11.6 million2018: revenue $14.2 million2018: expenses $12.1 million’182019: revenue $11.8 million2019: expenses $9.4 million2020: revenue $11.1 million2020: expenses $8.9 million’202021: revenue $8.5 million2021: expenses $8.5 million2022: revenue $11.9 million2022: expenses $9.7 million’222023: revenue $13.1 million2023: expenses $13.1 million2024: revenue $13.1 million2024: expenses $11.1 million’24

Revenue Expenses (top: $14.2M)

Beside the Conference USA, 2024-25

4th of 10 in revenue
  1. Liberty$23.0M / $23.0M
  2. Jacksonville State$15.0M / $15.0M
  3. Middle Tennessee$13.3M / $13.3M
  4. UTEP$13.1M / $11.1M
  5. Florida International$12.8M / $12.8M
  6. New Mexico State$11.8M / $11.8M
  7. Kennesaw State$11.5M / $11.5M
  8. Louisiana Tech$11.1M / $11.1M
  9. Western Kentucky$11.0M / $11.0M
  10. Sam Houston$9.7M / $9.7M

Each member’s football revenue (the thick bar) and expenses (the thin one under it) that year, as the schools reported them; schools count revenue differently.

Against the Mountain West

revenue, 2012-13 to 2024-25
  1. UNLV

    $24.7M in 24–⁠25

  2. Wyoming

    $16.6M in 24–⁠25

  3. Nevada

    $13.6M in 24–⁠25

  4. Northern Illinois

    $13.2M in 24–⁠25

  5. UTEP

    $13.1M in 24–⁠25

  6. Hawai’i

    $12.1M in 24–⁠25

  7. San José State

    $11.9M in 24–⁠25

  8. North Dakota State

    $8.4M in 24–⁠25

Each program’s football revenue by season, as each school reports it (EADA), on one scale (top: $24.7M), for the programs in the Mountain West this season, most revenue first; UTEP in its color.

By season

SeasonRevenueExpensesRecordSpent a winRankRosterAssistants
2024-25$13.1M$11.1M3–⁠9$3.7M102 of 12411416
2023-24$13.1M$13.1M3–⁠9$4.4M98 of 12512314
2022-23$11.9M$9.7M5–⁠7$1.9M98 of 12315314
2021-22$8.5M$8.5M7–⁠6$1.2M113 of 12212410
2020-21$11.1M$8.9M3–⁠5$3.0M83 of 12012410
2019-20$11.8M$9.4M1–⁠11$9.4M89 of 12312014
2018-19$14.2M$12.1M1–⁠11$12.1M78 of 12313110
2017-18$13.4M$11.6M0–⁠1280 of 1231369
2016-17$12.5M$9.7M4–⁠8$2.4M81 of 1211199
2015-16$11.6M$9.2M5–⁠7$1.8M80 of 12211911
2014-15$10.4M$7.8M7–⁠6$1.1M81 of 12210511
2013-14$11.8M$8.7M2–⁠10$4.3M74 of 12210711
2012-13$11.8M$8.7M3–⁠9$2.9M71 of 11910711

As The University of Texas at El Paso reports them to the US Department of Education under the Equity in Athletics Disclosure Act (ope.ed.gov/athletics). Schools count revenue differently (some include institutional support), so compare with care. “Spent a win” is the year’s football expenses over that season’s wins. Rank is football revenue among programs in the same division that season. Browse every school’s in the data.