2020 UTEP

3–⁠5 (0–⁠4 Conference USA), coached by Dana Dimel.

Schedule and results

UTEP in 2020, game by game: won vs. Stephen F. Austin 24–14; lost at Texas 3–59; won vs. Abilene Christian 17–13; won at UL Monroe 31–6; lost at Louisiana Tech 17–21; lost at Charlotte 28–38; lost at UTSA 21–52; lost vs. North Texas 43–45+25−56Won 24–14 vs. Stephen F. Austin+10Stephen F. Aust…Lost 3–59 at Texas-56TexasWon 17–13 vs. Abilene Christian+4Abilene Christi…Won 31–6 at UL Monroe+25UL MonroeLost 17–21 at Louisiana Tech-4Louisiana TechLost 28–38 at Charlotte-10CharlotteLost 21–52 at UTSA-31UTSALost 43–45 vs. North Texas-2North Texas
Each game’s margin, wins above the line and losses below.

Elo: a pregame chance from scores alone.

How it ended: Lost to North Texas 45–⁠43; unranked in the final AP poll; tied for 12th in the Conference USA.

In program history: The 67th-best season in program history by end-of-season Elo (of 94 on file).

Record
3–⁠5
Conference
0–⁠4 tied for 12th in Conference USA
AP final
Unranked
Points
184–⁠248
Coach
Dana Dimel
Elo
1295 +21 this season
SP+ rating
-18.6 No. 124 of 130; offense No. 121, defense No. 115
SRS
−17.2 No. 71 of 77 in FBS
Returning
27% of last season’s EPA, No. 120 of 130
Recruiting class
No. 131 roster talent No. 111 in FBS
Offensive coordinator
Mike Canales
Defensive coordinator
Mike Cox
Offense
Pro-style
Defense
4–⁠3

How good, play by play

  • Offense87th of 127
  • Defense93rd of 127
  • Offense, opponent-adjusted106th of 127
  • Defense, opponent-adjusted100th of 127
EPA per playSuccessExplosivenessFBS rank
Offense0.0538%1.2287th of 127
Defense0.1944%1.2793rd of 127
Opponent-adjusted0.05 off
0.16 def
37% off
45% def
—106th off
100th def
How these are measured

Play-weighted averages over games against FBS opponents; raw numbers, not adjusted for the strength of the opponent. EPA (expected points added) measures how much each play changed the expected score; success rate counts plays that kept the offense on schedule; explosiveness is the average EPA on successful plays. Lower is better on defense. Ranked by EPA per play among teams that were FBS that season. The opponent-adjusted row (offense / defense) is CollegeFootballData.com’s WEPA, which accounts for who each team played.

Drives and havoc

Points per trip inside the 40Average startHavoc
Offense3.4own 2817% allowed
Defense4.2own 3216% caused

CORE rating -14.7, 112th of 127 (offense -6.6, defense 8.1).

A trip inside the 40 is a drive that reaches the opponent’s 40-yard line; points per trip is how many it scored on average (allowed, on defense). Average start is where drives began (the defense’s line is where its opponents started). Havoc is the share of plays ending in a tackle for loss, a forced fumble, an interception or a pass broken up. CORE is CollegeFootballData.com’s context- and opponent-adjusted rating (points better than an average team; lower is better on defense). From CollegeFootballData.com.

Leaders

Passing yardsGavin Hardison QB1,419 yds
Passing touchdownsGavin Hardison QB5 TD
Rushing yardsDeion Hankins RB592 yds
Rushing touchdownsDeion Hankins RB9 TD
Receiving yardsJacob Cowing WR691 yds
Receiving touchdownsJacob Cowing WR3 TD
TacklesStephen Forester LB62 tkl
SacksPraise Amaewhule DE5.5 sacks
InterceptionsDuron Lowe CB2 INT

Top recruits in the 2020 class

Willie Eldridge RB★★★No. 1487
Osaiasi Taueli OLB★★★No. 1925
Michael Flood OG★★★No. 2503
Dresden McIver DT★★★No. 2628
Kiante Liggins ILB★★★No. 2747

247Sports composite rankings via CollegeFootballData.com; national rank in the class.

The 2020 class by position

SignedStarsRating
Running backs13.00.841
Offensive line32.70.793
Defensive line22.50.784
Linebackers52.40.794
Defensive backs12.00.780
Athletes and specialists22.00.760
Whole class142.40.790

High-school signees by position group, with their average stars and 247Sports composite rating (out of 1), via CollegeFootballData.com. Athletes are signees with no set position.

Roster 127

The 2020 roster

127 players, with numbers, heights, hometowns and each player’s 2020 line; 58 have a stat line. See the roster

2020 Conference USA standings

TeamConf.OverallAP final
Marshall4–⁠17–⁠3
UAB3–⁠16–⁠3
UTSA5–⁠27–⁠5
Florida Atlantic4–⁠25–⁠4
Louisiana Tech4–⁠25–⁠5
Western Kentucky4–⁠35–⁠7
Charlotte2–⁠22–⁠4
North Texas3–⁠44–⁠6
Rice2–⁠32–⁠3
Middle Tennessee2–⁠43–⁠6
Southern Miss2–⁠43–⁠7
UTEP0–⁠43–⁠5
Florida International0–⁠30–⁠5

Ordered by conference winning percentage, then conference wins. Division splits and tiebreakers aren’t applied.