Utah Tech football money

In 2024-25, Utah Tech football brought in $4.7 million and spent $4.7 million, the 78th-most revenue of 122 FCS programs. That’s $4.7 million for each of its 1 wins. 109 players were on the roster, with 19 assistant coaches.

Revenue and expenses

2012: revenue $1.1 million2012: expenses $1.1 million’122013: revenue $1.1 million2013: expenses $1.1 million2014: revenue $1.1 million2014: expenses $1.1 million’142015: revenue $1.2 million2015: expenses $1.2 million2016: revenue $1.3 million2016: expenses $1.3 million’162017: revenue $1.3 million2017: expenses $1.3 million2018: revenue $1.6 million2018: expenses $1.6 million’182019: revenue $1.9 million2019: expenses $1.9 million2020: revenue $2.6 million2020: expenses $2.6 million’202021: revenue $3.4 million2021: expenses $3.4 million2022: revenue $3.7 million2022: expenses $3.7 million’222023: revenue $4.3 million2023: expenses $4.3 million2024: revenue $4.7 million2024: expenses $4.7 million’24

Revenue Expenses (top: $4.7M)

Beside the United Athletic Conference, 2024-25

6th of 9 in revenue
  1. Tarleton State$8.8M / $8.8M
  2. Abilene Christian$7.4M / $7.3M
  3. Eastern Kentucky$6.8M / $6.8M
  4. Austin Peay$5.5M / $5.5M
  5. Southern Utah$5.2M / $4.3M
  6. Utah Tech$4.7M / $4.7M
  7. Central Arkansas$4.4M / $4.4M
  8. North Alabama$3.9M / $3.9M
  9. West Georgia$3.5M / $3.5M

Each member’s football revenue (the thick bar) and expenses (the thin one under it) that year, as the schools reported them; schools count revenue differently.

Against the Big Sky

revenue, 2012-13 to 2024-25
  1. Montana State

    $14.9M in 24–⁠25

  2. Montana

    $11.3M in 24–⁠25

  3. UC Davis

    $7.8M in 24–⁠25

  4. Cal Poly

    $7.4M in 24–⁠25

  5. Northern Arizona

    $6.8M in 24–⁠25

  6. Eastern Washington

    $6.6M in 24–⁠25

  7. Idaho

    $6.6M in 24–⁠25

  8. Northern Colorado

    $5.7M in 24–⁠25

  9. Idaho State

    $5.7M in 24–⁠25

  10. Portland State

    $5.4M in 24–⁠25

  11. Weber State

    $5.4M in 24–⁠25

  12. Southern Utah

    $5.2M in 24–⁠25

  13. Utah Tech

    $4.7M in 24–⁠25

Each program’s football revenue by season, as each school reports it (EADA), on one scale (top: $14.9M), for the programs in the Big Sky this season, most revenue first; Utah Tech in its color.

By season

SeasonRevenueExpensesRecordSpent a winRankRosterAssistants
2024-25$4.7M$4.7M1–⁠11$4.7M78 of 12210919
2023-24$4.3M$4.3M2–⁠9$2.2M83 of 12010611
2022-23$3.7M$3.7M4–⁠7$0.9M96 of 12212410
2021-22$3.4M$3.4M1–⁠10$3.4M91 of 11911413
2020-21$2.6M$2.6M2–⁠3$1.3M86 of 10111312
2019-20$1.9M$1.9M7 of 911011
2018-19$1.6M$1.6M10 of 1111211
2017-18$1.3M$1.3M11 of 1211510
2016-17$1.3M$1.3M11 of 1211011
2015-16$1.2M$1.2M11 of 1110611
2014-15$1.1M$1.1M11 of 1111911
2013-14$1.1M$1.1M0–⁠111 of 1110210
2012-13$1.1M$1.1M12 of 1212610

As Utah Tech University reports them to the US Department of Education under the Equity in Athletics Disclosure Act (ope.ed.gov/athletics). Schools count revenue differently (some include institutional support), so compare with care. “Spent a win” is the year’s football expenses over that season’s wins. Rank is football revenue among programs in the same division that season. Browse every school’s in the data.