CollegeFootballDigestfrom CooperSearch

Austin Peay football money

In 2024-25, Austin Peay football brought in $5.5 million and spent $5.5 million, the 53rd-most revenue of 122 FCS programs. That’s $1.4 million for each of its 4 wins. 108 players were on the roster, with 12 assistant coaches.

Revenue and expenses

2012: revenue $2.1 million2012: expenses $2.1 million’122013: revenue $2.1 million2013: expenses $2.1 million2014: revenue $2.5 million2014: expenses $2.4 million’142015: revenue $3.7 million2015: expenses $3.2 million2016: revenue $3.6 million2016: expenses $3.6 million’162017: revenue $4.8 million2017: expenses $4.0 million2018: revenue $4.9 million2018: expenses $4.1 million’182019: revenue $678,0002019: expenses $4.6 million2020: revenue $5.3 million2020: expenses $3.9 million’202021: revenue $4.9 million2021: expenses $4.2 million2022: revenue $5.4 million2022: expenses $5.4 million’222023: revenue $5.7 million2023: expenses $5.7 million2024: revenue $5.5 million2024: expenses $5.5 million’24

Revenue Expenses (top: $5.7M)

Beside the United Athletic Conference, 2024-25

4th of 9 in revenue
  1. Tarleton State$8.8M / $8.8M
  2. Abilene Christian$7.4M / $7.3M
  3. Eastern Kentucky$6.8M / $6.8M
  4. Austin Peay$5.5M / $5.5M
  5. Southern Utah$5.2M / $4.3M
  6. Utah Tech$4.7M / $4.7M
  7. Central Arkansas$4.4M / $4.4M
  8. North Alabama$3.9M / $3.9M
  9. West Georgia$3.5M / $3.5M

Each member’s football revenue (the thick bar) and expenses (the thin one under it) that year, as the schools reported them; schools count revenue differently.

Against the UAC

revenue, 2012-13 to 2024-25

  1. Tarleton State

    $8.8M in 24–⁠25

  2. Abilene Christian

    $7.4M in 24–⁠25

  3. Eastern Kentucky

    $6.8M in 24–⁠25

  4. Austin Peay

    $5.5M in 24–⁠25

  5. Central Arkansas

    $4.4M in 24–⁠25

  6. North Alabama

    $3.9M in 24–⁠25

  7. West Georgia

    $3.5M in 24–⁠25

  8. West Florida

    $2.6M in 24–⁠25

Each program’s football revenue by season, as each school reports it (EADA), on one scale (top: $8.8M), for the programs in the UAC this season, most revenue first; Austin Peay in its color.

By season

SeasonRevenueExpensesRecordSpent a winRankRosterAssistants
2024-25$5.5M$5.5M4–⁠8$1.4M53 of 12210812
2023-24$5.7M$5.7M9–⁠3$0.6M46 of 12011610
2022-23$5.4M$5.4M7–⁠4$0.8M45 of 12211410
2021-22$4.9M$4.2M6–⁠5$0.7M47 of 11911412
2020-21$5.3M$3.9M4–⁠5$1.0M19 of 10110710
2019-20$0.7M$4.6M11–⁠4$0.4M115 of 11711110
2018-19$4.9M$4.1M5–⁠6$0.8M34 of 11511210
2017-18$4.8M$4.0M8–⁠4$0.5M29 of 11310810
2016-17$3.6M$3.6M0–⁠1162 of 11310410
2015-16$3.7M$3.2M0–⁠1151 of 1131029
2014-15$2.5M$2.4M1–⁠11$2.4M95 of 112899
2013-14$2.1M$2.1M0–⁠497 of 112938
2012-13$2.1M$2.1M2–⁠9$1.0M95 of 11410110

As Austin Peay State University reports them to the US Department of Education under the Equity in Athletics Disclosure Act (ope.ed.gov/athletics). Schools count revenue differently (some include institutional support), so compare with care. “Spent a win” is the year’s football expenses over that season’s wins. Rank is football revenue among programs in the same division that season. Browse every school’s in the data.