2025 Utah State

6–⁠7 (4–⁠4 Mountain West Conference), coached by Bronco Mendenhall.

Schedule and results

Utah State in 2025, game by game: won vs. UTEP 28–16; lost at No. 19 Texas A&M 22–44; won vs. Air Force 49–30; won vs. McNeese 48–7; lost at No. 18 Vanderbilt 35–55; lost at Hawai’i 26–44; won vs. San José State 30–25; lost at New Mexico 14–33; won vs. Nevada 51–14; lost at UNLV 26–29; won at Fresno State 28–17; lost vs. Boise State 24–25; lost vs. Washington State 21–34+41−22Won 28–16 vs. UTEP+12UTEPLost 22–44 at No. 19 Texas A&M-22No. 19 Texas A&MWon 49–30 vs. Air Force+19Air ForceWon 48–7 vs. McNeese+41McNeeseLost 35–55 at No. 18 Vanderbilt-20No. 18 VanderbiltLost 26–44 at Hawai’i-18Hawai’iWon 30–25 vs. San José State+5San José StateLost 14–33 at New Mexico-19New MexicoWon 51–14 vs. Nevada+37NevadaLost 26–29 at UNLV-3UNLVWon 28–17 at Fresno State+11Fresno StateLost 24–25 vs. Boise State-1Boise StateLost 21–34 vs. Washington State-13Washington State
Each game’s margin, wins above the line and losses below.
DateOpponentResultElo
Aug 30vsUTEPW 28–⁠1665%
Sep 6at19Texas A&ML 22–⁠4425%
Sep 13vsAir ForceW 49–⁠3049%
Sep 20vsMcNeeseW 48–⁠782%
Sep 27at18VanderbiltL 35–⁠5526%
Oct 11atHawai’iL 26–⁠4442%
Oct 17vsSan José StateW 30–⁠2553%
Oct 25atNew MexicoL 14–⁠3341%
Nov 8vsNevadaW 51–⁠1474%
Nov 15atUNLVL 26–⁠2922%
Nov 22atFresno StateW 28–⁠1729%
Nov 28vsBoise StateL 24–⁠2542%
Dec 22vsWashington StateFamous Idaho Potato BowlL 21–⁠3442%

Elo: a pregame chance from scores alone.

How it ended: Lost to Washington State 34–⁠21 in the Famous Idaho Potato Bowl; unranked in the final AP poll; 7th in the Mountain West Conference.

In program history: The 57th-best season in program history by end-of-season Elo (of 120 on file).

Record
6–⁠7
Conference
4–⁠4 7th in Mountain West Conference
AP final
Unranked
Points
402–⁠373
Coach
Bronco Mendenhall
Elo
1455 +22 this season
SP+ rating
-3.1 No. 79 of 136; offense No. 53, defense No. 98, special teams No. 109
SRS
−1.9 No. 78 of 136 in FBS
Returning
25% of last season’s EPA, No. 85 of 134
Recruiting class
No. 87 roster talent No. 114 in FBS
Offensive coordinator
Kevin McGiven
Defensive coordinator
Nick Howell
Offense
Spread option
Defense
3–⁠3–⁠5

How good, play by play

  • Offense34th of 136
  • Defense84th of 136
  • Offense, opponent-adjusted47th of 136
  • Defense, opponent-adjusted92nd of 136
EPA per playSuccessExplosivenessFBS rank
Offense0.1539%1.3434th of 136
Defense0.1444%1.2684th of 136
Opponent-adjusted0.12 off
0.14 def
40% off
44% def
—47th off
92nd def

Passing and running

Pass successDepth of targetDeep throwsLine yardsStuffed
Offense45%10.2 yds16%3.1017%
Defense43%8.7 yds10%3.4013%
How these are measured

Play-weighted averages over games against FBS opponents; raw numbers, not adjusted for the strength of the opponent. EPA (expected points added) measures how much each play changed the expected score; success rate counts plays that kept the offense on schedule; explosiveness is the average EPA on successful plays. Lower is better on defense. Ranked by EPA per play among teams that were FBS that season. The opponent-adjusted row (offense / defense) is CollegeFootballData.com’s WEPA, which accounts for who each team played. Passing and running: depth of target is how far downfield passes traveled in the air; deep throws are the share thrown deep, of the passes whose depth and direction the play-by-play describes (about half); line yards are the running yards per carry credited to the blockers; stuffed is the share of carries stopped at or behind the line. The defense’s line is what its opponents did. From CollegeFootballData.com, 2025 on.

Drives and havoc

Points per trip inside the 40Average startHavoc
Offense4.5own 2816% allowed
Defense3.8own 2914% caused

CORE rating -1.5, 71st of 136 (offense 1.3, defense 2.8).

A trip inside the 40 is a drive that reaches the opponent’s 40-yard line; points per trip is how many it scored on average (allowed, on defense). Average start is where drives began (the defense’s line is where its opponents started). Havoc is the share of plays ending in a tackle for loss, a forced fumble, an interception or a pass broken up. CORE is CollegeFootballData.com’s context- and opponent-adjusted rating (points better than an average team; lower is better on defense). From CollegeFootballData.com.

Leaders

Passing yardsBryson Barnes QB2,802 yds
Passing touchdownsBryson Barnes QB18 TD
Rushing yardsBryson Barnes QB740 yds
Rushing touchdownsBryson Barnes QB10 TD
Receiving yardsBraden Pegan WR925 yds
Receiving touchdownsBrady Boyd WR8 TD
TacklesJohn Miller LB118 tkl
SacksJohn Miller LB8 sacks
InterceptionsNoah Avinger CB3 INT

Top recruits in the 2025 class

Sam Brousseau OT★★★No. 1560
Charger Doty S★★★No. 1614
Kaleb Mitchell WR★★★No. 1711
Malakai Alofipo WR★★★No. 1738
Nikko Boncore WR★★★No. 1738

247Sports composite rankings via CollegeFootballData.com; national rank in the class.

The 2025 class by position

SignedStarsRating
Running backs33.00.829
Receivers63.00.844
Offensive line43.00.824
Defensive line23.00.821
Linebackers32.70.813
Defensive backs63.00.828
Athletes and specialists13.00.820
Whole class253.00.829

High-school signees by position group, with their average stars and 247Sports composite rating (out of 1), via CollegeFootballData.com. Athletes are signees with no set position.

Roster 109

The 2025 roster

109 players, with numbers, heights, hometowns and each player’s 2025 line; 54 have a stat line. See the roster

2025 Mountain West Conference standings

TeamConf.OverallAP final
UNLV6–⁠210–⁠4
San Diego State6–⁠29–⁠4
New Mexico6–⁠29–⁠4
Boise State6–⁠29–⁠5
Hawai’i5–⁠39–⁠4
Fresno State5–⁠39–⁠4
Utah State4–⁠46–⁠7
Air Force3–⁠54–⁠8
Wyoming2–⁠64–⁠8
San José State2–⁠63–⁠9
Nevada2–⁠63–⁠9
Colorado State1–⁠72–⁠10

Ordered by conference winning percentage, then conference wins. Division splits and tiebreakers aren’t applied.