2025 Boise State

9–⁠5 (6–⁠2 Mountain West Conference), coached by Spencer Danielson.

Schedule and results

Boise State in 2025, game by game: lost at South Florida 7–34; won vs. Eastern Washington 51–14; won at Air Force 49–37; won vs. App State 47–14; lost at No. 21 Notre Dame 7–28; won vs. New Mexico 41–25; won vs. UNLV 56–31; won at Nevada 24–3; lost vs. Fresno State 7–30; lost at San Diego State 7–17; won vs. Colorado State 49–21; won at Utah State 25–24; won vs. UNLV 38–21; lost vs. Washington 10–38+37−28Lost 7–34 at South Florida-27South FloridaWon 51–14 vs. Eastern Washington+37Eastern Washing…Won 49–37 at Air Force+12Air ForceWon 47–14 vs. App State+33App StateLost 7–28 at No. 21 Notre Dame-21No. 21 Notre DameWon 41–25 vs. New Mexico+16New MexicoWon 56–31 vs. UNLV+25UNLVWon 24–3 at Nevada+21NevadaLost 7–30 vs. Fresno State-23Fresno StateLost 7–17 at San Diego State-10San Diego StateWon 49–21 vs. Colorado State+28Colorado StateWon 25–24 at Utah State+1Utah StateWon 38–21 vs. UNLV+17UNLVLost 10–38 vs. Washington-28Washington
Each game’s margin, wins above the line and losses below.
DateOpponentResultElo
Aug 28atSouth FloridaL 7–⁠3464%
Sep 5vsEastern WashingtonW 51–⁠1489%
Sep 20atAir ForceW 49–⁠3761%
Sep 27vsApp StateW 47–⁠1475%
Oct 4at21Notre DameL 7–⁠2830%
Oct 11vsNew MexicoW 41–⁠2576%
Oct 18vsUNLVW 56–⁠3154%
Oct 24atNevadaW 24–⁠384%
Nov 1vsFresno StateL 7–⁠3081%
Nov 15atSan Diego StateL 7–⁠1753%
Nov 22vsColorado StateW 49–⁠2182%
Nov 28atUtah StateW 25–⁠2458%
Dec 5vsUNLVMountain West ChampionshipW 38–⁠2150%
Dec 13vsWashingtonLA BowlL 10–⁠3849%

Elo: a pregame chance from scores alone.

How it ended: Lost to Washington 38–⁠10 in the LA Bowl; unranked in the final AP poll; Mountain West Conference champions.

In program history: The 27th-best season in program history by end-of-season Elo (of 56 on file).

AP poll, week by week

  1. Wk 1: 25

Mountain West Conference champions6–⁠2 in the conference

Record
9–⁠5
Conference
6–⁠2 shared first in Mountain West Conference
AP final
Unranked peak No. 25
Points
418–⁠337
Coach
Spencer Danielson
Elo
1597 −40 this season
SP+ rating
3.1 No. 64 of 136; offense No. 55, defense No. 60, special teams No. 89
SRS
4.3 No. 50 of 136 in FBS
Returning
58% of last season’s EPA, No. 29 of 134
Recruiting class
No. 62 roster talent No. 81 in FBS
Offensive coordinators
Nate Potter and Matt Miller
Defensive coordinators
Erik Chinander and Tyler Stockton
Offense
Pro spread
Defense
4–⁠2–⁠5

How good, play by play

  • Offense77th of 136
  • Defense32nd of 136
  • Offense, opponent-adjusted81st of 136
  • Defense, opponent-adjusted30th of 136
EPA per playSuccessExplosivenessFBS rank
Offense0.0740%1.2877th of 136
Defense0.0336%1.3732nd of 136
Opponent-adjusted0.06 off
0.02 def
40% off
36% def
—81st off
30th def

Passing and running

Pass successDepth of targetDeep throwsLine yardsStuffed
Offense43%9.0 yds12%3.2014%
Defense34%8.9 yds16%3.0017%
How these are measured

Play-weighted averages over games against FBS opponents; raw numbers, not adjusted for the strength of the opponent. EPA (expected points added) measures how much each play changed the expected score; success rate counts plays that kept the offense on schedule; explosiveness is the average EPA on successful plays. Lower is better on defense. Ranked by EPA per play among teams that were FBS that season. The opponent-adjusted row (offense / defense) is CollegeFootballData.com’s WEPA, which accounts for who each team played. Passing and running: depth of target is how far downfield passes traveled in the air; deep throws are the share thrown deep, of the passes whose depth and direction the play-by-play describes (about half); line yards are the running yards per carry credited to the blockers; stuffed is the share of carries stopped at or behind the line. The defense’s line is what its opponents did. From CollegeFootballData.com, 2025 on.

Drives and havoc

Points per trip inside the 40Average startHavoc
Offense3.7own 3114% allowed
Defense4.1own 2917% caused

CORE rating 1.5, 59th of 136 (offense -3.5, defense -5.0).

A trip inside the 40 is a drive that reaches the opponent’s 40-yard line; points per trip is how many it scored on average (allowed, on defense). Average start is where drives began (the defense’s line is where its opponents started). Havoc is the share of plays ending in a tackle for loss, a forced fumble, an interception or a pass broken up. CORE is CollegeFootballData.com’s context- and opponent-adjusted rating (points better than an average team; lower is better on defense). From CollegeFootballData.com.

Leaders

Passing yardsMaddux Madsen QB2,333 yds
Passing touchdownsMaddux Madsen QB18 TD
Rushing yardsDylan Riley RB1,125 yds
Rushing touchdownsDylan Riley RB10 TD
Receiving yardsLatrell Caples WR616 yds
Receiving touchdownsBen Ford WR5 TD
TacklesTy Benefield S105 tkl
SacksJayden Virgin LB6 sacks
InterceptionsA’Marion McCoy DB4 INT

Top recruits in the 2025 class

Greg Ard RB★★★★No. 458
Jaden Williams DE★★★No. 914
Ja’Bree Bickham CB★★★No. 1062
Gavin Packer WR★★★No. 1067
Tahj Crutchfield CB★★★No. 1254

247Sports composite rankings via CollegeFootballData.com; national rank in the class.

The 2025 class by position

SignedStarsRating
Quarterbacks13.00.800
Running backs14.00.892
Receivers63.00.853
Offensive line43.00.849
Defensive line53.00.852
Linebackers23.00.845
Defensive backs53.00.853
Athletes and specialists23.00.828
Whole class263.00.849

High-school signees by position group, with their average stars and 247Sports composite rating (out of 1), via CollegeFootballData.com. Athletes are signees with no set position.

Drafted in 2026

The 2026 draft
Rd 4Kage Casey OTDenver Broncos

Roster 109

The 2025 roster

109 players, with numbers, heights, hometowns and each player’s 2025 line; 58 have a stat line. See the roster

2025 Mountain West Conference standings

TeamConf.OverallAP final
UNLV6–⁠210–⁠4
San Diego State6–⁠29–⁠4
New Mexico6–⁠29–⁠4
Boise State6–⁠29–⁠5
Hawai’i5–⁠39–⁠4
Fresno State5–⁠39–⁠4
Utah State4–⁠46–⁠7
Air Force3–⁠54–⁠8
Wyoming2–⁠64–⁠8
San José State2–⁠63–⁠9
Nevada2–⁠63–⁠9
Colorado State1–⁠72–⁠10

Ordered by conference winning percentage, then conference wins. Division splits and tiebreakers aren’t applied.