2017 Tulsa

2–⁠10 (1–⁠7 American Athletic Conference), coached by Philip Montgomery.

Schedule and results

Tulsa in 2017, game by game: lost at No. 10 Oklahoma State 24–59; won vs. Louisiana 66–42; lost at Toledo 51–54; lost vs. New Mexico 13–16; lost vs. Navy 21–31; lost at Tulane 28–62; won vs. Houston 45–17; lost at UConn 14–20; lost at SMU 34–38; lost vs. No. 22 Memphis 14–41; lost at No. 23 South Florida 20–27; lost vs. Temple 22–43+28−35Lost 24–59 at No. 10 Oklahoma State-35No. 10 Oklahoma StateWon 66–42 vs. Louisiana+24LouisianaLost 51–54 at Toledo-3ToledoLost 13–16 vs. New Mexico-3New MexicoLost 21–31 vs. Navy-10NavyLost 28–62 at Tulane-34TulaneWon 45–17 vs. Houston+28HoustonLost 14–20 at UConn-6UConnLost 34–38 at SMU-4SMULost 14–41 vs. No. 22 Memphis-27No. 22 MemphisLost 20–27 at No. 23 South Florida-7No. 23 South FloridaLost 22–43 vs. Temple-21Temple
Each game’s margin, wins above the line and losses below.

Elo: a pregame chance from scores alone.

How it ended: Lost to Temple 43–⁠22; unranked in the final AP poll; 12th in the American Athletic Conference.

In program history: The 60th-best season in program history by end-of-season Elo (of 111 on file).

Record
2–⁠10
Conference
1–⁠7 12th in American Athletic Conference
AP final
Unranked
Points
352–⁠450
Coach
Philip Montgomery
Elo
1427 −162 this season
SP+ rating
-10.7 No. 103 of 128; offense No. 76, defense No. 115, special teams No. 72
SRS
−8.3 No. 98 of 130 in FBS
Returning
26% of last season’s EPA, No. 118 of 128
Recruiting class
No. 85 roster talent No. 80 in FBS
Defensive coordinators
Brian Norwood and Bill Young
Offense
Veer and shoot
Defense
4–⁠3

How good, play by play

  • Offense45th of 130
  • Defense123rd of 130
  • Offense, opponent-adjusted53rd of 130
  • Defense, opponent-adjusted125th of 130
EPA per playSuccessExplosivenessFBS rank
Offense0.1343%1.2745th of 130
Defense0.2646%1.39123rd of 130
Opponent-adjusted0.10 off
0.22 def
41% off
46% def
—53rd off
125th def
How these are measured

Play-weighted averages over games against FBS opponents; raw numbers, not adjusted for the strength of the opponent. EPA (expected points added) measures how much each play changed the expected score; success rate counts plays that kept the offense on schedule; explosiveness is the average EPA on successful plays. Lower is better on defense. Ranked by EPA per play among teams that were FBS that season. The opponent-adjusted row (offense / defense) is CollegeFootballData.com’s WEPA, which accounts for who each team played.

Drives and havoc

Points per trip inside the 40Average startHavoc
Offense3.5own 2915% allowed
Defense3.6own 3213% caused

CORE rating -12.9, 110th of 130 (offense -1.4, defense 11.6).

A trip inside the 40 is a drive that reaches the opponent’s 40-yard line; points per trip is how many it scored on average (allowed, on defense). Average start is where drives began (the defense’s line is where its opponents started). Havoc is the share of plays ending in a tackle for loss, a forced fumble, an interception or a pass broken up. CORE is CollegeFootballData.com’s context- and opponent-adjusted rating (points better than an average team; lower is better on defense). From CollegeFootballData.com.

Leaders

Passing yardsLuke Skipper QB1,141 yds
Passing touchdownsChad President QB3 TD
Rushing yardsD’Angelo Brewer RB1,517 yds
Rushing touchdownsShamari Brooks RB10 TD
Receiving yardsJustin Hobbs WR830 yds
Receiving touchdownsJustin Hobbs WR3 TD
TacklesMcKinley Whitfield S113 tkl
SacksJeremy Smith DE6 sacks
InterceptionsCraig Suits LB2 INT

Top recruits in the 2017 class

Sam Crawford WR★★★No. 495
Seth Boomer PRO★★★No. 1218
Dante Bivens OG★★★No. 1246
Daiquain Jackson ATH★★★No. 1508
Keylon Stokes WR★★★No. 1582

247Sports composite rankings via CollegeFootballData.com; national rank in the class.

The 2017 class by position

SignedStarsRating
Quarterbacks13.00.838
Running backs13.00.811
Receivers52.40.813
Offensive line32.30.791
Defensive line32.30.792
Linebackers22.00.771
Defensive backs32.30.799
Athletes and specialists52.60.795
Whole class232.40.799

High-school signees by position group, with their average stars and 247Sports composite rating (out of 1), via CollegeFootballData.com. Athletes are signees with no set position.

Roster 103

The 2017 roster

103 players, with numbers, heights, hometowns and each player’s 2017 line; 54 have a stat line. See the roster

2017 American Athletic Conference standings

Conference page
TeamConf.OverallAP final
UCF8–⁠013–⁠06
Memphis7–⁠110–⁠325
South Florida6–⁠210–⁠221
Houston5–⁠37–⁠5
SMU4–⁠47–⁠6
Navy4–⁠47–⁠6
Temple4–⁠47–⁠6
Tulane3–⁠55–⁠7
Cincinnati2–⁠64–⁠8
East Carolina2–⁠63–⁠9
UConn2–⁠63–⁠9
Tulsa1–⁠72–⁠10

Ordered by conference winning percentage, then conference wins. Division splits and tiebreakers aren’t applied.