D’Angelo Brewer

Expected points added: how much the player’s plays moved the team’s expected score, per play and in total. Plays: total EPA divided by EPA per play, the plays the source credits to him (for a receiver roughly his catches and runs, not every target; for a passer, not every attempt), so it can differ from attempts plus carries. Percentile: against the position’s regulars that season across all divisions on file (quarterbacks with 150+ plays, backs 60+, receivers and tight ends 30+), with how many there were (n) and their median; a dash means too few plays to rank. A season in progress uses the full-season bar scaled by games played, never below 75 plays for quarterbacks, 30 for backs and 20 for receivers. The cohort grows or shrinks with the source’s coverage each season (2025 lists far more players), so compare percentiles rather than raw EPA across years. FCS seasons are marked. Usage: the share of the team’s plays the player was part of (shown from 20 plays). Adjusted pass and rush: EPA per play adjusted for the defenses faced (CollegeFootballData’s WEPA). From CollegeFootballData, 2013 on.

2017 Tulsa 11 games, 1,517 rushing yards, 9 TD

Date	Opponent	Result	Car	Yds	TD	Long	Rec	Rec yds
Aug 31	atOklahoma State	L 24–⁠59	22	33	0	10	1	18
Sep 9	vs.Louisiana	W 66–⁠42	38	262	3	60	–	–
Sep 16	atToledo	L 51–⁠54	38	152	1	27	–	–
Sep 23	vs.New Mexico	L 13–⁠16	16	131	1	45	1	11
Sep 30	vs.Navy	L 21–⁠31	22	65	1	10	1	7
Oct 7	atTulane	L 28–⁠62	7	41	0	15	1	12
Oct 14	vs.Houston	W 45–⁠17	23	140	1	46	–	–
Oct 27	atSMU	L 34–⁠38	33	156	1	34	–	–
Nov 3	vs.Memphis	L 14–⁠41	21	119	0	30	1	1
Nov 16	atSouth Florida	L 20–⁠27	34	163	0	29	3	36
Nov 25	vs.Temple	L 22–⁠43	34	255	1	24	1	3

2016 Tulsa 12 games, 1,435 rushing yards, 7 TD

Date	Opponent	Result	Car	Yds	TD	Long	Rec	Rec yds
Sep 3	vs.San José State	W 45–⁠10	22	164	3	40	1	14
Sep 10	atOhio State	L 3–⁠48	15	58	0	14	1	−4
Sep 17	vs.North Carolina A&T	W 58–⁠21	14	60	0	26	–	–
Sep 24	atFresno State	W 48–⁠41	46	252	0	18	1	−1
Oct 7	vs.SMU	W 43–⁠40	38	182	1	35	–	–
Oct 15	atHouston	L 31–⁠38	10	26	0	16	–	–
Oct 22	vs.Tulane	W 50–⁠27	18	61	0	13	2	10
Nov 5	vs.East Carolina	W 45–⁠24	23	180	1	42	–	–
Nov 12	atNavy	L 40–⁠42	15	81	0	22	–	–
Nov 19	atUCF	W 35–⁠20	25	167	2	41	–	–
Nov 25	vs.Cincinnati	W 40–⁠37	21	99	0	20	–	–
Dec 19 ✦	vs.Central Michigan	W 55–⁠10	17	105	0	15	–	–

2015 Tulsa 11 games, 837 rushing yards, 6 TD

Date	Opponent	Result	Car	Yds	TD	Long	Rec	Rec yds
Sep 5	vs.Florida Atlantic	W 47–⁠44	16	92	0	17	1	7
Sep 12	atNew Mexico	W 40–⁠21	20	133	1	22	–	–
Sep 19	atOklahoma	L 38–⁠52	5	13	0	6	–	–
Oct 3	vs.Houston	L 24–⁠38	6	33	0	22	1	7
Oct 10	vs.UL Monroe	W 34–⁠24	16	91	0	17	2	21
Oct 31	atSMU	W 40–⁠31	23	119	1	23	–	–
Nov 7	vs.UCF	W 45–⁠30	19	82	0	12	1	27
Nov 14	atCincinnati	L 38–⁠49	17	82	1	11	2	5
Nov 21	vs.Navy	L 21–⁠44	11	43	1	14	6	20
Nov 27	atTulane	W 45–⁠34	15	44	0	7	1	16
Dec 26 ✦	vs.Virginia Tech	L 52–⁠55	14	105	2	48	1	4

2014 Tulsa 11 games, 128 rushing yards, 1 TD

Date	Opponent	Result	Car	Yds	TD	Long	Rec	Rec yds
Aug 28	vs.Tulane	W 38–⁠31	4	11	0	7	–	–
Sep 6	vs.Oklahoma	L 7–⁠52	8	26	0	7	–	–
Sep 13	atFlorida Atlantic	L 21–⁠50	1	0	0	0	–	–
Oct 4	atColorado State	L 17–⁠42	1	2	0	2	1	21
Oct 11	atTemple	L 24–⁠35	–	–	–	–	1	11
Oct 18	vs.South Florida	L 30–⁠38	–	–	–	–	–	–
Oct 31	atMemphis	L 20–⁠40	1	2	0	2	2	32
Nov 8	vs.SMU	W 38–⁠28	6	33	0	11	–	–
Nov 14	atUCF	L 7–⁠31	5	12	0	5	–	–
Nov 22	atHouston	L 28–⁠38	–	–	–	–	–	–
Nov 28	vs.East Carolina	L 32–⁠49	13	42	1	12	–	–

Box scores from CollegeFootballData, 2004 on. ✦ postseason; ★ a career high on file.